Literature DB >> 17452511

Risk of tearing the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee and rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective MOON cohort study.

Rick W Wright1, Warren R Dunn, Annunziato Amendola, Jack T Andrish, John Bergfeld, Christopher C Kaeding, Robert G Marx, Eric C McCarty, Richard D Parker, Michelle Wolcott, Brian R Wolf, Kurt P Spindler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The risk of tear of the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the opposite knee and the incidence of rupturing the anterior cruciate ligament graft during the first 2 years after surgery have not been extensively studied in a prospective manner. Clinicians have hypothesized that the opposite normal knee is at equal or increased risk compared with the risk of anterior cruciate ligament graft rupture in the operated knee. HYPOTHESIS: The risk of anterior cruciate ligament graft rupture and contralateral normal knee anterior cruciate ligament rupture at 2-year follow-up is equal. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: The Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcome Network (MOON) database of a prospective longitudinal cohort of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions was used to determine the number of anterior cruciate ligament graft ruptures and tears of the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee at 2-year follow-up. Two-year follow-up consisted of a phone interview and review of operative reports.
RESULTS: Two-year data were obtained for 235 of 273 patients (86%). There were 14 ligament disruptions. Of these, 7 were tears of the intact anterior cruciate ligament in the contralateral knee (3.0%) and 7 were anterior cruciate ligament graft failures (3.0%).
CONCLUSION: The contralateral normal knee anterior cruciate ligament is at a similar risk of anterior cruciate ligament tear (3.0%) as the anterior cruciate ligament graft after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (3.0%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17452511     DOI: 10.1177/0363546507301318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  115 in total

1.  Predictors for additional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: data from the Swedish national ACL register.

Authors:  Anne Fältström; Martin Hägglund; Henrik Magnusson; Magnus Forssblad; Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  The reliability of the vail sport test™ as a measure of physical performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J Craig Garrison; Ellen Shanley; Chuck Thigpen; Ryan Geary; Mike Osler; Jackie Delgiorno
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  ACL Research Retreat V: an update on ACL injury risk and prevention, March 25-27, 2010, Greensboro, NC.

Authors:  Sandra J Shultz; Randy J Schmitz; Anh-Dung Nguyen; Ajit M Chaudhari; Darin A Padua; Scott G McLean; Susan M Sigward
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Complications associated with realignment osteotomy of the knee performed simultaneously with additional reconstructive procedures.

Authors:  Michael Willey; Brian R Wolf; Baris Kocaglu; Annunziato Amendola
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

6.  Revision ACL reconstruction outcomes: MOON cohort.

Authors:  Rick Wright; Kurt Spindler; Laura Huston; Annunziato Amendola; Jack Andrish; Rob Brophy; James Carey; Charlie Cox; David Flanigan; Morgan Jones; Christopher Kaeding; Robert Marx; Matthew Matava; Eric McCarty; Richard Parker; Armando Vidal; Michelle Wolcott; Brian Wolf; Warren Dunn
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Incidence and Predictors of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury After Primary Reconstruction and Return to Sport.

Authors:  Mark V Paterno
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 8.  The Impact of the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Research on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Orthopaedic Practice.

Authors:  T Sean Lynch; Richard D Parker; Ronak M Patel; Jack T Andrish; Kurt P Spindler; Annunziata Amendola; Robert H Brophy; Warren R Dunn; David C Flanigan; Laura J Huston; Morgan H Jones; Christopher C Kaeding; Robert G Marx; Matthew J Matava; Eric C McCarty; Angela D Pedroza; Emily K Reinke; Brian R Wolf; Rick W Wright
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 3.020

9.  Do graft diameter or patient age influence the results of ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Marchand; Nicolas Ruiz; Augustin Coupry; Mark Bowen; Henri Robert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Long-term rate of graft failure after ACL reconstruction: a geographic population cohort analysis.

Authors:  Thomas L Sanders; Ayoosh Pareek; Timothy E Hewett; Bruce A Levy; Diane L Dahm; Michael J Stuart; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-13       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.