Literature DB >> 11774141

Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in females: A comparison of hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft.

Gene R Barrett1, Frank K Noojin, Charles W Hartzog, Carrie R Nash.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female patients using quadruple-looped hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft at minimum 2-year follow-up. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series.
METHODS: A prospective clinical review was performed to compare the results of ACL reconstruction with hamstring versus patellar tendon autograft in a group of female patients. Exclusion criteria included chronic injuries (greater than 3 months), associated collateral ligament injuries, Workers' Compensation or litigation cases, and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries. There were 39 female patients in the hamstring group (average follow-up, 40.9 months) and 37 female patients in the patellar tendon group (average follow-up, 52 months). Both types of grafts were fixed with an EndoButton proximally and with sutures tied over a post or button distally. The postoperative rehabilitation regimen was identical for both groups. Objective parameters evaluated included preinjury and postoperative Tegner and Lysholm scores, side-to-side KT-1000 maximum-manual arthrometer differences, and clinical examination including Lachman and pivot-shift tests. Graft failure was defined by any one of the following: a KT-1000 difference of greater than 5 mm, a 2+ Lachman, a 1+ or greater pivot shift, or revision surgery.
RESULTS: The failure rate in the hamstring group was 23% versus 8% in the patellar tendon group, which was not statistically significant (P >.1). Comparison of preinjury Tegner activity scores to postoperative scores revealed that patients in the hamstring group did not return to their preinjury level of activity (preinjury 6.54 v postoperative 5.17) as well as patients in the patellar tendon group (preinjury 6.20 v postoperative 6.59). Patients in the hamstring group had a significant increase in pain compared with the patellar tendon group (P =.034).
CONCLUSIONS: Although not statistically significant, the hamstring group had more failures, more laxity on clinical examination, and more patients with larger KT-1000 arthrometer differences. These results indicate a trend toward increased graft laxity in female patients undergoing reconstruction with hamstring autograft compared with patellar tendon when evaluated by a single surgeon using similar fixation techniques at short- to medium-range follow-up. More studies with larger patient numbers using current fixation techniques are necessary to confirm these findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11774141     DOI: 10.1053/jars.2002.25974

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  41 in total

1.  Two-year outcomes following ACL reconstruction with allograft tibialis anterior tendons: a retrospective study.

Authors:  J Nyland; D N M Caborn; J Rothbauer; Y Kocabey; J Couch
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females: a comparison of hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autografts.

Authors:  Rainer Siebold; Kate E Webster; Julian A Feller; Alasdair G Sutherland; Johanna Elliott
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in female patients.

Authors:  Michael Svensson; Ninni Sernert; Lars Ejerhed; Jon Karlsson; Jüri T Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Iliotibial band friction syndrome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transfix device: report of two cases and review of the literature.

Authors:  Xavier Pelfort; Joan C Monllau; Lluís Puig; Enric Cáceres
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  A prospective comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in male patients.

Authors:  Gauti Laxdal; Ninni Sernert; Lars Ejerhed; Jon Karlsson; Jüri T Kartus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Boris A Zelle; Peter U Brucker; Matthew T Feng; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Reconstruction of the ACL with a semitendinosus tendon graft: a prospective randomized single blinded comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle technique in male athletes.

Authors:  Nikolaus A Streich; Kilian Friedrich; Tobias Gotterbarm; Holger Schmitt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Prospective comparison of auto and allograft hamstring tendon constructs for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Cory M Edgar; Scott Zimmer; Sanjeev Kakar; Hugh Jones; Anthony A Schepsis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Do graft diameter or patient age influence the results of ACL reconstruction?

Authors:  Jean Baptiste Marchand; Nicolas Ruiz; Augustin Coupry; Mark Bowen; Henri Robert
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Tibial fixation comparison of semitendinosus-bone composite allografts fixed with bioabsorbable screws and bone-patella tendon-bone grafts fixed with titanium screws.

Authors:  Y Kocabey; S Klein; J Nyland; D Caborn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-07-04       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.