Literature DB >> 16002490

Hamstring tendon versus patellar tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using biodegradable interference fit fixation: a prospective matched-group analysis.

Michael Wagner1, Max J Kääb, Jessica Schallock, Norbert P Haas, Andreas Weiler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are still controversies about graft selection for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, especially with respect to knee stability and functional outcome. HYPOTHESIS: Biodegradable interference screw fixation of hamstring tendon grafts provides clinical results similar to those achieved with identical fixation of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts. STUDY
DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: In 1996 and 1997, primary isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft was performed in 72 patients. Since 1998, hamstring tendons were used as routine grafts. Matched patients with a hamstring tendon graft were selected from a database (n = 284). All patients were followed prospectively for a minimum of 2 years with KT-1000 arthrometer testing, International Knee Documentation Committee score, and Lysholm score.
RESULTS: In the bone-patellar tendon-bone group, 9 patients were excluded because of bilateral rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament, 3 patients (4.2%) had a graft rupture, and 4 patients were lost to follow-up (follow-up rate, 92.1%), leaving 56 patients for a matched-group analysis. In the hamstring tendon database, the graft rupture rate was 5.6% (P = .698). The Lysholm score was 89.7 in the patellar tendon group and 94 in the hamstring tendon group (P = .003). The KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference was 2.6 mm for the patellar tendon group and 2.1 mm for the hamstring tendon group (P = .041). There were significantly less positive pivot-shift test results in the hamstring tendon group (P = .005), and hamstring tendon patients showed lower thigh atrophy (P = .024) and patellofemoral crepitus (P = .003). Overall International Knee Documentation Committee scores were better (P = .001) in the hamstring tendon group (hamstring tendon: 34 x A, 21 x B, 0 x C, 0 x D; bone-patellar tendon-bone: 17 x A, 32 x B, 6 x C, 0 x D).
CONCLUSIONS: In this comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone and anatomical hamstring tendon grafts, the hamstring tendon graft was superior in knee stability and function. These findings are partially contrary to previous studies and might be attributable to the use of an anatomical joint line fixation for hamstring tendon grafts. Thus, hamstring tendons are the authors' primary graft choice for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, even in high-level athletes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16002490     DOI: 10.1177/0363546504273488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  36 in total

1.  One-stage bilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with use of hamstring tendon autografts: a case report.

Authors:  Matjaz Sajovic; Saska Demsar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Femoral fixation of hamstring tendon grafts in ACL reconstructions: the 2-year follow-up results of a prospective randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Tone Gifstad; Jon Olav Drogset; Torbjørn Grøntvedt; Grete Sofie Hortemo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods.

Authors:  Jon Olav Drogset; Torbjørn Strand; Gisle Uppheim; Bjørn Odegård; Asbjørn Bøe; Torbjørn Grøntvedt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Variables associated with return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sylvia Czuppon; Brad A Racette; Sandra E Klein; Marcie Harris-Hayes
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 13.800

5.  A prospective randomized comparison of irradiated and non-irradiated hamstring tendon allograft for ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Kang Sun; Jihua Zhang; Yan Wang; Cailong Zhang; Changsuo Xia; Tengbo Yu; Shaoqi Tian
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Arthroscopic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with six-strand hamstring tendon allograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft.

Authors:  Chengliang Dai; Fei Wang; Xiaomeng Wang; Ruipeng Wang; Shengjie Wang; Shiyu Tang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-13       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Low re-rupture rate with BPTB autograft and semitendinosus gracilis autograft with preserved insertions in ACL reconstruction surgery in sports persons.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Munish Sood; Anubhav Malhotra; Gladson David Masih; Anil Kapoor; Mukta Raghav; Mehar Dhillon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in athletes: a 5-year follow up comparing patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  Johannes Leitgeb; Julia Köttstorfer; Julia Koettsdorfer; Rupert Schuster; Florian M Kovar; Patrick Platzer; Silke Aldrian
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 1.704

9.  Vitamin D deficiency in athletes and its impact on outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament surgery.

Authors:  Ravi Gupta; Akash Singhal; Anil Kapoor; Vaibhav Bohat; Gladson David Masih; Rohil Mehta
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2021-01-08

Review 10.  The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Francisco Lajara; Gonzalo Samitier; Ramón Cugat
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.