Literature DB >> 34604426

Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players.

Luiz Gabriel Betoni Guglielmetti1, Victor Eduardo Roman Salas1, Pedro Baches Jorge1, Fabrício Roberto Severino1, Aires Duarte1, Victor Marques de Oliveira1, Ricardo de Paula Leite Cury1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is usually performed with autologous bone-patellar tendon-bone (PT) or hamstring tendon (HT) graft. There has been only 1 randomized clinical trial examining ACL reconstruction with these grafts specifically in soccer players, and more studies comparing these graft types within a homogenous cohort such as soccer athletes may better highlight differences in outcomes.
PURPOSE: To compare the results of ACL reconstruction with PT versus HT autograft in soccer players and to evaluate objective and subjective outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
METHODS: A total of 62 professional or semiprofessional soccer players (mean age, 25.1 years) with ACL injury were randomized to undergo reconstruction with PT or HT autograft by a single orthopaedic surgeon (n = 31 in each group). Outcome measures were recorded preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and secondary outcomes were the objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, anterior drawer test, and Lysholm score. The following variables were also evaluated postoperatively: return to soccer, level at return, graft rerupture, postoperative complications, anterior knee pain, patellar tendinitis, difficulty sprinting, and loss of kicking power.
RESULTS: The PT and HT groups were homogenous in terms of age, sex distribution, injured side, and time from injury to surgery, and there was no difference between them on any preoperative outcome score. At 2 years postoperatively, there were no differences between the groups on any outcome score; however, there were significantly fewer patients with anterior knee pain in the HT group compared with the PT group (7 [22.6%] vs 15 [48.4%], respectively; P = .03). Two patients from each group (2/31; 6.5%) sustained rerupture.
CONCLUSION: There were no differences between soccer players who underwent different types of ACL reconstruction with the exception of anterior knee pain, which was more frequent in players who underwent reconstruction with PT graft.Registration: NCT02642692 (ClinicalTrials.gov).
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; graft; reconstruction; sports

Year:  2021        PMID: 34604426      PMCID: PMC8485166          DOI: 10.1177/23259671211028168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med        ISSN: 2325-9671


  32 in total

1.  Isokinetic evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: hamstring versus patellar tendon.

Authors:  T R Carter; S Edinger
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.772

2.  Factors associated with returning to football after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Alexander Sandon; Suzanne Werner; Magnus Forssblad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Credibility and quality of meta-analyses addressing graft choice in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Adrian Kurz; Nathan Evaniew; Marco Yeung; Kristian Samuelsson; Devin Peterson; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form: normative data.

Authors:  Allen F Anderson; James J Irrgang; Mininder S Kocher; Barton J Mann; John J Harrast
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

Authors:  I S Corry; J M Webb; A J Clingeleffer; L A Pinczewski
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

6.  A two- and five-year follow-up of clinical outcome after ACL reconstruction using BPTB or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective intervention outcome study.

Authors:  Annette Heijne; Maria Hagströmer; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Patient predictors of early revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study of 16,930 patients with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel Andernord; Neel Desai; Haukur Björnsson; Mattias Ylander; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Hamstring Autograft versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for ACL Reconstruction: Is There a Difference in Graft Failure Rate? A Meta-analysis of 47,613 Patients.

Authors:  Brian T Samuelsen; Kate E Webster; Nick R Johnson; Timothy E Hewett; Aaron J Krych
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a metaanalysis comparing patellar tendon and hamstring tendon autografts.

Authors:  Kevin B Freedman; Michael J D'Amato; David D Nedeff; Ari Kaz; Bernard R Bach
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Are Female Soccer Players at an Increased Risk of Second Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Compared With Their Athletic Peers?

Authors:  Melissa M Allen; Ayoosh Pareek; Aaron J Krych; Timothy E Hewett; Bruce A Levy; Michael J Stuart; Diane L Dahm
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Yi Cao; Ye-da Wan
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 2.279

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.