Literature DB >> 29766295

The impact of temporal contingencies between cue and target onset on spatial attentional capture by subliminal onset cues.

Tobias Schoeberl1, Ulrich Ansorge2.   

Abstract

Prior research suggested that attentional capture by subliminal abrupt onset cues is stimulus driven. In these studies, reacting was faster when a searched-for target appeared at the location of a preceding abrupt onset cue compared to when the same target appeared at a location away from the cue (cueing effect), although the earlier onset of the cue was subliminal, because it appeared as one out of three horizontally aligned placeholders with a lead time that was too short to be noticed by the participants. Because the cueing effects seemed to be independent of top-down search settings for target features, the effect was attributed to stimulus-driven attentional capture. However, prior studies did not investigate if participants experienced the cues as useful temporal warning signals and, therefore, attended to the cues in a top-down way. Here, we tested to which extent search settings based on temporal contingencies between cue and target onset could be responsible for spatial cueing effects. Cueing effects were replicated, and we showed that removing temporal contingencies between cue and target onset did not diminish the cueing effects (Experiments 1 and 2). Neither presenting the cues in the majority of trials after target onset (Experiment 1) nor presenting cue and target unrelated to one another (Experiment 2) led to a significant reduction of the spatial cueing effects. Results thus support the hypothesis that the subliminal cues captured attention in a stimulus-driven way.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29766295     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1001-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  23 in total

1.  Inhibition of return.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Intentional and unintentional contributions to nonspecific preparation during reaction time foreperiods.

Authors:  S A Los; C E van den Heuvel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.

Authors:  C L Folk; R W Remington; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Endogenous temporal orienting of attention in detection and discrimination tasks.

Authors:  Angel Correa; Juan Lupiáñez; Bruce Milliken; Pío Tudela
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-02

Review 5.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2010-05-26

6.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-06

Review 7.  Displaywide visual features associated with a search display's appearance can mediate attentional capture.

Authors:  Bryan R Burnham
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-06

8.  The effective time course of preparation.

Authors:  Sander A Los; Marcus L J Schut
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2008-02-05       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Christian N L Olivers; Adelbert W Bronkhorst; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Inhibition of return is no hallmark of exogenous capture by unconscious cues.

Authors:  Isabella Fuchs; Ulrich Ansorge
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The Nature of Unconscious Attention to Subliminal Cues.

Authors:  Seema Prasad; Ramesh Kumar Mishra
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.