Literature DB >> 18823194

Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.

Erik Van der Burg1, Christian N L Olivers, Adelbert W Bronkhorst, Jan Theeuwes.   

Abstract

Searching for an object within a cluttered, continuously changing environment can be a very time-consuming process. The authors show that a simple auditory pip drastically decreases search times for a synchronized visual object that is normally very difficult to find. This effect occurs even though the pip contains no information on the location or identity of the visual object. The experiments also show that the effect is not due to general alerting (because it does not occur with visual cues), nor is it due to top-down cuing of the visual change (because it still occurs when the pip is synchronized with distractors on the majority of trials). Instead, we propose that the temporal information of the auditory signal is integrated with the visual signal, generating a relatively salient emergent feature that automatically draws attention. Phenomenally, the synchronous pip makes the visual object pop out from its complex environment, providing a direct demonstration of spatially nonspecific sounds affecting competition in spatial visual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18823194     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.5.1053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  114 in total

1.  Does media multitasking always hurt? A positive correlation between multitasking and multisensory integration.

Authors:  Kelvin F H Lui; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-08

2.  Semantic congruency but not temporal synchrony enhances long-term memory performance for audio-visual scenes.

Authors:  Hauke S Meyerhoff; Markus Huff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04

3.  When audiovisual correspondence disturbs visual processing.

Authors:  Sang Wook Hong; Won Mok Shim
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Catch the moment: multisensory enhancement of rapid visual events by sound.

Authors:  Yi-Chuan Chen; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Dual mechanisms for the cross-sensory spread of attention: how much do learned associations matter?

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; John J Foxe; Sophie Molholm
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Going, going, gone? Proactive control prevents the congruency sequence effect from rapid decay.

Authors:  W Duthoo; E L Abrahamse; S Braem; W Notebaert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2014-07

7.  Rapid recalibration to audiovisual asynchrony.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; David Alais; John Cass
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Multisensory congruency as a mechanism for attentional control over perceptual selection.

Authors:  Raymond van Ee; Jeroen J A van Boxtel; Amanda L Parker; David Alais
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.

Authors:  Erik Van der Burg; Edward Awh; Christian N L Olivers
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2013-02-06

10.  The Attentional Boost Effect: Transient increases in attention to one task enhance performance in a second task.

Authors:  Khena M Swallow; Yuhong V Jiang
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-01-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.