Literature DB >> 10740278

Inhibition of return.

.   

Abstract

Immediately following an event at a peripheral location there is facilitation for the processing of other stimuli near that location. This is said to reflect a reflexive shift of attention towards the source of stimulation. After attention is removed from such a peripheral location, there is then delayed responding to stimuli subsequently displayed there. This inhibitory aftereffect, first described in 1984 and later labeled 'inhibition of return (IOR)', encourages orienting towards novel locations and hence might facilitate foraging and other search behaviors. Since its relatively recent discovery, IOR has been the subject of intensive investigation, from many angles and with a wide variety of approaches. After describing the seminal contribution of Posner and Cohen ('Who'), this review will discuss what causes IOR and, once initiated, what effects IOR has on subsequent processing ('What'). The time course ('When') and spatial distribution ('Where') of IOR, and what is known about IOR's neural implementation ('How') and functional significance ('Why') are also discussed.

Year:  2000        PMID: 10740278     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01452-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  393 in total

1.  The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.

Authors:  J Ivanoff; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Tracking the influence of reflexive attention on sensory and cognitive processing.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; G R Mangun
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Inhibition of return spreads across 3-D space.

Authors:  Jan Theeuwes; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-09

4.  Location and shape in inhibition of return.

Authors:  Lucia Riggio; Ilaria Patteri; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2003-06-21

5.  The modulation of inhibition of return by object-internal structure: implications for theories of object-based attentional selection.

Authors:  Irene Reppa; E Charles Leek
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

6.  The attentional repulsion effect in perception and action.

Authors:  Jay Pratt; Nicholas B Turk-Browne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Inhibition of return and the human frontal eye fields.

Authors:  Tony Ro; Alessandro Farnè; Erik Chang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-12       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Search for multiple targets: evidence for memory-based control of attention.

Authors:  Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-02

9.  Independent effects of endogenous and exogenous spatial cueing: inhibition of return at endogenously attended target locations.

Authors:  Juan Lupiáñez; Caroline Decaix; Eric Siéroff; Sylvie Chokron; Bruce Milliken; Paolo Bartolomeo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Sensory biases produce alternation advantage found in sequential saccadic eye movement tasks.

Authors:  Jillian H Fecteau; Crystal Au; Irene T Armstrong; Douglas P Munoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.