| Literature DB >> 29765052 |
Fivos Perakis1,2, Gaia Camisasca3, Thomas J Lane4, Alexander Späh3, Kjartan Thor Wikfeldt3, Jonas A Sellberg5, Felix Lehmkühler6,7, Harshad Pathak3, Kyung Hwan Kim3, Katrin Amann-Winkel3, Simon Schreck3, Sanghoon Song4, Takahiro Sato4, Marcin Sikorski4,8, Andre Eilert4, Trevor McQueen4, Hirohito Ogasawara4, Dennis Nordlund4, Wojciech Roseker6, Jake Koralek4, Silke Nelson4, Philip Hart4, Roberto Alonso-Mori4, Yiping Feng4, Diling Zhu4, Aymeric Robert4, Gerhard Grübel6,7, Lars G M Pettersson3, Anders Nilsson9.
Abstract
The dynamics of liquid water feature a variety of time scales, ranging from extremely fast ballistic-like thermal motion, to slower molecular diffusion and hydrogen-bond rearrangements. Here, we utilize coherent X-ray pulses to investigate the sub-100 fs equilibrium dynamics of water from ambient conditions down to supercooled temperatures. This novel approach utilizes the inherent capability of X-ray speckle visibility spectroscopy to measure equilibrium intermolecular dynamics with lengthscale selectivity, by measuring oxygen motion in momentum space. The observed decay of the speckle contrast at the first diffraction peak, which reflects tetrahedral coordination, is attributed to motion on a molecular scale within the first 120 fs. Through comparison with molecular dynamics simulations, we conclude that the slowing down upon cooling from 328 K down to 253 K is not due to simple thermal ballistic-like motion, but that cage effects play an important role even on timescales over 25 fs due to hydrogen-bonding.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29765052 PMCID: PMC5953967 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04330-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Coherent X-ray diffraction of water droplets with variable pulse duration. a Schematic of the experimental setup used at LCLS to measure liquid droplets utilizing two detectors at different sample-detector distances. A CSPAD detector in close proximity to the sample is used to obtain single-shot X-ray diffraction over a large momentum transfer Q range and an ePix detector located at a larger distance is employed to resolve the speckle pattern’s contrast with higher Q resolution. A diode is used to measure the intensity of the direct beam on a single-shot basis. The droplets are injected with a droplet dispenser and cooled by evaporative cooling. In order to extract information about the dynamics, the exposure time is varied by changing the X-ray pulse duration δt from 10 to 120 fs. b In the case where molecular motion is slower than the exposure time (top), the scattering pattern should exhibit high speckle contrast in reciprocal space. If the molecules move during the exposure time (bottom) the speckle contrast will be reduced, making the scattering pattern smoother
Fig. 2Speckle contrast analysis. a The mean photon density probability distribution of 3·104 shots recorded at T = 296 K with pulse duration δt = 50 fs. In the inset is shown a fraction of the ePix detector for a single shot with photons/pixel, which consists mainly of pixels with 1 photon count (green) and 2 photon counts (yellow). The solid red line depicts a Gaussian fit. b The speckle contrast β as a function of number of shots N. Here is shown the running average over 120 shots (blue) and the cumulative average (red)
Fig. 3Pulse duration dependence. a The temporal probability distribution of X-ray shots for variable target pulse durations δt. b The cumulative average of the speckle contrast β for increasing number of shots N at T = 296 K for different target pulse durations as indicated in the legend. The dashed lines indicate the total average. c Speckle contrast β as a function of pulse duration δt for two different temperatures T = 296 K and 328 K. The maximum contrast β0 for the current settings is estimated (β0 = 0.069 ± 0.001) by its value at δt = 0. The vertical error bars are the standard error and the horizontal the FWHM of the pulse duration distribution. The solid and dashed lines are fits to the experimental data
Fig. 4Temperature dependence. a Temperature dependence of the angularly integrated scattering intensity I(Q) as a function of momentum transfer Q. The dashed lines indicate the Q-range over which the speckle contrast was investigated. b Q value of the maximum of I(Q), where the dashed line highlights the shift of the peak to lower Q upon cooling. The errorbars is the standard error. c Cumulative average of the speckle contrast β over number of X-ray laser shots N for different temperatures as indicated in the figure. The dashed lines indicate the total average. d Corresponding average values of β/β0, with error bars corresponding to the standard error. The dashed line highlights the increase of the speckle contrast upon cooling, which is an indication of gradual slowing down of the molecular motion within the exposure time δt = 75 fs
Fig. 5Molecular dynamics simulations and comparison to experiment. a Snapshots from the simulations for different exposure times comparable to the experiment. b The intermediate scattering function F(Q,t) obtained from TIP4P/2005 at different temperatures. The inset depicts F(Q,t) over longer times in logarithmic scale. c Comparison of the normalized speckle contrast between theory and experiment. The symbols are the experimental data at two different temperatures (circles 296 K, squares 328 K). The lines are simulated values using TIP4P/2005 (dashed) and MB-pol (solid), while the dotted lines correspond to the purely ballistic case at temperatures 300 K (blue) and 330 K (red). d Comparison of the speckle contrast as a function of temperature as estimated from the experiment (circles) with simulations (crosses MB-pol, x’s TIP4P/2005) and the purely ballistic case (dotted line) at δt = 75 fs. The lines depict linear fits to highlight the difference in slope between experiment and simulations. The errorbars in c and d correspond to the standard error
Fig. 6A schematic representation of the different regimes of water dynamics. a The intermediate scattering function F(Q,t) is depicted as a function of the logarithm of time. The curves correspond to the experiment (solid), and the pure ballistic case (dotted). The vertical lines highlight the three different regimes: the early ballistic thermal-like motion, the cage effect regime and the diffusive regime. The current experiment probes the timescales between the ballistic regime and the cage effects. b The isothermal compressibility exhibits similar trends as the observed dynamics, when comparing experiments[60] with simulations[29,31]