| Literature DB >> 31614087 |
Henning Weiss1, Hsiu-Wei Cheng2, Julian Mars1,3, Hailong Li1, Claudia Merola2, Frank Uwe Renner4, Veijo Honkimäki5, Markus Valtiner2,6, Markus Mezger1,3.
Abstract
The molecular-scale structure and dynamics of confined liquids has increaEntities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31614087 PMCID: PMC6933819 DOI: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b01215
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Langmuir ISSN: 0743-7463 Impact factor: 3.882
Figure 1Structure of hard spheres with diameter d in a 2D slit-pore confinement at gap widths of D = d (a), (b), D = 2d (c), and (d). In 3D, adjacent layers of close-packed spheres (b and d) arrange with respect to their tetrahedral gaps. Dynamic response of the system after applying shear stress (e) or an electric potential (f).
Figure 2Overview of X-SFA geometries to study confined liquids by X-ray scattering. Scattering angles follow the six-circle notation by Vlieg et al.[38] with incident angle α, exit angle γ, in-plane angle δ, and total scattering angle 2θ. (a) In transmission geometry, incident and scattered X-ray beams (orange) penetrate both confining slit-pore walls (gray).[39] (b) In in-plane scattering geometry, the incident beam α = 0 is aligned parallel to the confining surfaces. At γ = 0, the momentum transfer of the scattering vector q = kf – ki points in the direction perpendicular to the surface normal (i.e., q∥ in the x–y plane). (c) Specular reflectivity (XRR) with α = γ and q = q parallel to the surface normal of the slit-pore walls. This configuration probes interfacial profiles along the z direction (i.e., across the slit pore). Confinement can be created in the standard SFA crossed-cylinders geometry (d), the colloidal probe sphere-on-flat geometry (e), the cylinder-on-flat geometry (f), or the plane–plane geometry (g).
Figure 3Photography of the X-SFA setup mounted on the HEMD diffractometer (1) at ID31 ESRF. Lines indicate optical (white and green light) and X-ray (red) beam paths. The SFA with the confined liquid (inset) is located at the diffractometer’s rotation center inside a helium-filled stainless steel chamber (2). X-rays enter and leave the chamber nearly horizontally through 80 μm Kapton windows (3) and are recorded on 2D detectors (4). White light from a fiber light source (5) is fed in via a mirror from below. The microscope objective (6), beam splitter (7), top-view CCD camera (8), and spectrometer (9) are mounted above the sample chamber on the upper instrument level.
Figure 4Schematic of the X-SFA setup including double-cantilever springs with strain gauges and optics for recording Newton’s interference and fringes of equal chromatic order (FECO). (a) Top view of the confined 8CB by video microscopy indicating perfect parallel alignment of the opposing surfaces. (b) FECOs are used to determine the gap width.
Figure 10Cyclic compression/decompression experiment at gap width 107 nm ≤ D ≤ 120 nm (trapezoidal force profile, 20 mN amplitude, 2 s ramp). (a) Time evolution of the gap distance (black) and normalized specular XRR signal I(q) (red) during 64 s compression/decompression periods. White areas indicate compression, and gray areas, decreased pressure. (b) Relative change in gap width ΔD(t) during compression (blue triangles down) and decompression (red triangles up) periods n = 1 (dark), 3 (medium), and 6 (light). (c) Overall step heights ΔD(n) extracted from gap widths averaged over the last 10 s of the holding time of subsequent half cycles.
Figure 5Beamline setup for high-energy scattering experiments at ID31 ESRF (Feb 2016): (OH1/2) optics hutches; (EH) experimental hutch; (U22) 22 mm periode permanent magnet in-vacuum undulator; (GA) gas absorber (1 m argon at 300 mbar); (HPS1/2/3) high power slits; (TF1/2) compound refractive lens (CRL) transfocators; (MLM) horizontal multilayer double monochromator in fixed-exit geometry; (PA) PEEK (polyether ether ketone) absorber set; (FS) rotary fast shutter; (BS) beam safety shutter; (T) flight tubes; (SS) secondary slits; (MD) silicon PIN monitor diode; (HEMD) high-energy microdiffraction setup; (S) sample position; (CS) collimator slits; (DS) detector slits; (DD) silicon PIN detector diode; and (D) 2D detector (CdTe MAXIPIX). Distances are not to scale.
Figure 6Rod-shaped (calamitic) structure of 4′-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl (8CB) dimers (left) and molecular alignment in the liquid-crystalline smectic A phase (right).
Figure 7Scattering signal from confined 8CB. (a) In-plane pattern I(q∥) recorded in the scattering geometry depicted in Figure b. (b) Measured (red) specular X-ray reflectivity R(q). Model calculated reflectivity curve (purple, vertically shifted by 1 order of magnitude) from a periodic arrangement of 560 smectic 8CB layers arranged with their long axis perpendicular to the solid/liquid interface.
Figure 8Dynamic compression/decompression experiments at D ≈ 1700 nm. (a) Two-dimensional scattering patterns around the specular condition. The arc is located at qI = 2.0 nm–1. (b) Time evolution of compressive stress (black, 8 s ramp, 60 s holding time, 136 s period, 20 mN force amplitude), the specular XRR SmA first-order signal (red, qI = 2.0 nm–1, q direction), the in-plane-scattering SmA first-order signal (green, qI = 2.0 nm–1, q∥ direction), and the in-plane scattering diffuse signal (blue, qII = 14 nm–1, q∥ direction). Curves are scaled and vertically shifted for clarity. White areas indicate compression, and gray areas, decreased pressure. (c) Two-dimensional pattern in the in-plane direction. The arc is located at qI = 2.0 nm–1. Areas in the vertical scattering direction are masked to protect the detector from high intensities. Time stamps are numbered 1 to 5.
Figure 9Sketch of the molecular structure of confined 8CB. The functionalized solid surfaces (blue) induce an orientation with the LC director parallel to the interface normal (brown). Grain boundary energies make misaligned domains (red) energetically unstable. However, they can gradually adjust in height during slit-pore opening. During compression, these 8CB dimers get integrated into the majority domain (brown), leading to an overall increase in alignment.
Figure 11Smaller vertical beam sizes, available at upcoming diffraction-limited storage rings, will enable spatially resolved experiments on laterally inhomogeneous slit pores. Examples include engineered surface topographies mimicking roughness (left) and hydrophilic vs hydrophobic or negatively vs positively charged surface patterns (right).