Henning Weiss1, Hsiu-Wei Cheng2, Julian Mars1,3, Hailong Li1, Claudia Merola2, Frank Uwe Renner4, Veijo Honkimäki5, Markus Valtiner2,6, Markus Mezger1,3. 1. Max Planck Institute for Polymer Research , Ackermannweg 10 , 55128 Mainz , Germany. 2. Institute of Applied Physics , Vienna Institute of Technology , Wiedner Hauptstrasse 8-10/E134 , 1040 Wien , Austria. 3. Institute of Physics , Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz , 55128 Mainz , Germany. 4. Institute for Materials Research , Hasselt University , 3590 Diepenbeek , Belgium. 5. ESRF-European Synchrotron Radiation Facility , Avenue des Martyrs 71 , 38043 Grenoble , Cedex 9 , France. 6. Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH , Max-Planck-Strasse 1 , 40237 Düsseldorf , Germany.
Abstract
The molecular-scale structure and dynamics of confined liquids has increasingly gained relevance for applications in nanotechnology. Thus, a detailed knowledge of the structure of confined liquids on molecular length scales is of great interest for fundamental and applied sciences. To study confined structures under dynamic conditions, we constructed an in situ X-ray surface forces apparatus (X-SFA). This novel device can create a precisely controlled slit-pore confinement down to dimensions on the 10 nm scale by using a cylinder-on-flat geometry for the first time. Complementary structural information can be obtained by simultaneous force measurements and X-ray scattering experiments. The in-plane structure of liquids parallel to the slit pore and density profiles perpendicular to the confining interfaces are studied by X-ray scattering and reflectivity. The normal load between the opposing interfaces can be modulated to study the structural dynamics of confined liquids. The confinement gap distance is tracked simultaneously with nanometer precision by analyzing optical interference fringes of equal chromatic order. Relaxation processes can be studied by driving the system out of equilibrium by shear stress or compression/decompression cycles of the slit pore. The capability of the new device is demonstrated on the liquid crystal 4'-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl (8CB) in its smectic A (SmA) mesophase. Its molecular-scale structure and orientation confined in 100 nm to 1.7 μm slit pores was studied under static and dynamic nonequilibrium conditions.
The molecular-scale structure and dynamics of confined liquids has increasingly gained relevance for applications in nanotechnology. Thus, a detailed knowledge of the structure of confined liquids on molecular length scales is of great interest for fundamental and applied sciences. To study confined structures under dynamic conditions, we constructed an in situ X-ray surface forces apparatus (X-SFA). This novel device can create a precisely controlled slit-pore confinement down to dimensions on the 10 nm scale by using a cylinder-on-flat geometry for the first time. Complementary structural information can be obtained by simultaneous force measurements and X-ray scattering experiments. The in-plane structure of liquids parallel to the slit pore and density profiles perpendicular to the confining interfaces are studied by X-ray scattering and reflectivity. The normal load between the opposing interfaces can be modulated to study the structural dynamics of confined liquids. The confinement gap distance is tracked simultaneously with nanometer precision by analyzing optical interference fringes of equal chromatic order. Relaxation processes can be studied by driving the system out of equilibrium by shear stress or compression/decompression cycles of the slit pore. The capability of the new device is demonstrated on the liquid crystal 4'-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl (8CB) in its smectic A (SmA) mesophase. Its molecular-scale structure and orientation confined in 100 nm to 1.7 μm slit pores was studied under static and dynamic nonequilibrium conditions.
Confined liquids play an important role in many technical applications
and processes. For example, the dynamics of electrolytes in nanoscale
confinement are relevant to the development of novel electric double-layer
caal">pacitors and electrochemical processes.[1−4] In heterogeneous catalysis, the
performance of a reaction has been shown to be sensitive to the molecular-scale
liquid structure in a nanoporous material.[5] In particular for complex electrolytes with heterogeneities on the
nanometer length scale,[6−9] confinement can qualitatively alter structural properties. High-speed
printing and film deposition on nanoscopically rough surfaces depend
on the wetting property of surfactants in small pores. Thus, a detailed
knowledge of the structure of confined liquids on molecular length
scales is of great interest for fundamental and applied sciences.[10]
When confinement approaches the molecular dimensions of liquids,
structural and dynamical properties can differ significantly from
their bulk behavior[11−13] (Figure a–d). It has been shown that, depending on the intermolecular
forces, soft matter adjacent to a solid and near surfaces can exhibit
interfacial regions of reduced density,[14−16] interfacial freezing,[17−19] interfacial melting,[20−23] molecular layering,[24−31] molecular orientation,[32] or specific
lateral molecular arrangements.[33] Furthermore,
the phase diagram of confined liquids can differ significantly from
the bulk.[34,35] Such interface-induced structures can strongly
affect the dynamics in a confined system. Prominent examples include
increasing friction under lateral shear[36,37] as well as
increased reactivity at electrified interfaces[3] (Figure e,f).
Figure 1
Structure of hard spheres with diameter d in a
2D slit-pore confinement at gap widths of D = d (a), (b), D = 2d (c), and (d). In 3D, adjacent layers of close-packed
spheres (b and d) arrange with respect to their tetrahedral gaps.
Dynamic response of the system after applying shear stress (e) or
an electric potential (f).
Structure of hard spheres with diameter d in a
2D slit-pore confinement at gap widths of D = d (a), (b), D = 2d (c), and (d). In 3D, adjacent layers of close-packed
spheres (b and d) arrange with respect to their tetrahedral gaps.
Dynamic response of the system after applying shear stress (e) or
an electric potential (f).Today, most structural information on the molecular-scale arrangement
of confined fluids is obtained by computer simulations[40,41] or indirectly deduced from force–distance curves measured
using a surface forces apparatus (SFA, Figure d), colloidal probe[42−44] (Figure e), or atomic force microscope
(AFM). In particular, the SFA is an established experimental setup
to simultaneously measure forces and distances across two surfaces
approaching each other on a range from micrometers down to nanometers
with nanometer precision.
Figure 2
Overview of X-SFA geometries to study confined liquids by X-ray
scattering. Scattering angles follow the six-circle notation by Vlieg
et al.[38] with incident angle α, exit
angle γ, in-plane angle δ, and total scattering angle
2θ. (a) In transmission geometry, incident and scattered X-ray
beams (orange) penetrate both confining slit-pore walls (gray).[39] (b) In in-plane scattering geometry, the incident
beam α = 0 is aligned parallel to the confining surfaces. At
γ = 0, the momentum transfer of the scattering vector q = kf – ki points in the direction perpendicular to the surface
normal (i.e., q∥ in the x–y plane). (c) Specular reflectivity (XRR) with α
= γ and q = q parallel to the surface normal of the slit-pore
walls. This configuration probes interfacial profiles along the z direction (i.e., across the slit pore). Confinement can
be created in the standard SFA crossed-cylinders geometry (d), the
colloidal probe sphere-on-flat geometry (e), the cylinder-on-flat
geometry (f), or the plane–plane geometry (g).
Overview of X-SFA geometries to study confined liquids by X-ray
scattering. Scattering angles follow the six-circle notation by Vlieg
et al.[38] with incident angle α, exit
angle γ, in-plane angle δ, and total scattering angle
2θ. (a) In transmission geometry, incident and scattered X-ray
beams (orange) penetrate both confining slit-pore walls (gray).[39] (b) In in-plane scattering geometry, the incident
beam α = 0 is aligned parallel to the confining surfaces. At
γ = 0, the momentum transfer of the scattering vector q = kf – ki points in the direction perpendicular to the surface
normal (i.e., q∥ in the x–y plane). (c) Specular reflectivity (XRR) with α
= γ and q = q parallel to the surface normal of the slit-pore
walls. This configuration probes interfacial profiles along the z direction (i.e., across the slit pore). Confinement can
be created in the standard SFA crossed-cylinders geometry (d), the
colloidal probe sphere-on-flat geometry (e), the cylinder-on-flat
geometry (f), or the plane–plane geometry (g).This article is structured as follows. First, we give an overview
of past and present experimental approaches to address the molecular-scale
structures and dynamics of confined fluids by elastic scattering and
force measurements. We then describe a novel design for an X-ray surface
forces apparatus (X-SFA) in cylinder-on-flat geometry combining the
capabilities of an SFA setup with X-ray scattering techniques. Our first X-SFA experiments on smectic liquid crystal 4′-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl
(8CB) in confinement are presented. They demonstrate the feasibility
of the cylinder-on-flat geometry and the increased sensitivity and
capability of the new instrument. The article closes with an outlook
in which we discuss the potential of the new setup to answer current
scientific questions in the field of soft condensed matter, develop
ideas for future instruments, and outline first concepts for experiments
that will become possible with new synchrotron sources.[45,46]
Experiments Probing the Structure and Dynamics of Confined Liquids
An SFA is used to study liquids under controlled slit-pore confinement
with gap dimensions down to the molecular length scale.[47] Furthermore, a SFA can very precisely apply
stress to the confined material and measure its viscoelastic response.
From SFA experiments, limited structural information can be obtained
from refractive index measurements.[48,49] However, force
measurements in an SFA, colloidal probe, or AFM, actually do not directly
probe the spatial arrangement of the molecules.[50,51] Instead, structural information is inferred from force measurements
using model assumptions to interpret the force data.[52,53] On the other hand, X-ray scattering and reflectivity (XRR) are powerful
techniques to directly probe structures on molecular length scales
in the bulk and at interfaces.[54−56] Today, high-brilliant synchrotron
sources allow us to study the structural dynamics at interfaces and
in small sample volumes in situ on submicrosecond time scales.[57−60]For instance, extensive work has been conducted on the molecular-scale
structure of soft matter confinement in porous bulklike materials
using X-ray and neutron scattering techniques.[35,61−65] Today, nearly monodisperse cylinders in silica or aluminum oxide
(AAO) with diameters ranging from 5 nm to 1 μm are available.[66−70] The macroscopic amount of liquid confined inside millions of uniform
pores allows the use of bulk techniques such as dielectric spectroscopy,[71,72] NMR,[73] optical birefringent,[35] and QENS.[74] However,
even for such well-defined pores, in scattering experiments some of
the structural information on the confined liquids is lost because
of the intrinsic average in cylinder symmetry. In disordered and polydisperse
porous materials, a quantitative interpretation of scattering data
is even more challenging. Because of the Gibbs–Thomson effect,[75,76] the large curvature in nanosized porous materials strongly affects
the phase behavior of confined fluids.[77] Moreover, dynamic studies during shear, compression, and decompression
are intrinsically difficult to realize experimentally in a porous
system. Therefore, to probe the intrinsic structure and dynamics of
liquids confined between two parallel walls, other geometries have
to be employed.An X-ray surface forces apparatus (X-SFA) simultaneously combines
the two complementary experimental techniques of force–distance
measurements and X-ray scattering.[47] This
unique combination promises results not accessible by any other experimental
method. Moreover, an SFA allows moving the pore walls vertically and
laterally with respect to each other. Therefore, the development of
an X-SFA that allows driving the structure of confined liquids out
of equilibrium by lateral and vertical motion of the pore walls while
recording its relaxation by scattering techniques will open up new
ways to study the structural relaxation dynamics of confined liquids
under shear and load.The first X-SFA for transmission experiments (Figure a) in crossed-cylinder geometry
(Figure d) was introduced
in 1993 by Israelachvili’s and Safinya’s groups.[36,78−84] Experiments on liquid crystal 4′-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl (8CB)
demonstrated that a 10-nm-thick 8CB film provides sufficient scattering
intensity to extract structural information on the molecular orientation
induced by the confinement between the two mica cylinders.Later, two different teams, lead by Reichert and Mugele at ID10C,[85] ESRF and van der Veen and Heuberger at the Swiss
Light Source,[86] used a similar geometry.
The latter team also explored the potential of an X-SFA for X-ray
reflectivity (Figure c) using the crossed-cylinder geometry (Figure d).[87−90] However, because of the large curvature of the cylinders,
data can be taken only at large vertical momentum transfers q > 4.0 nm–1. This precludes conventional XRR measurements in the Fresnel regime.
Therefore, the structure of the confined liquid can be deduced only
from crystal truncation rods (CTR) using a rather complex data analysis.[90] No structural in-plane information (Figure b) is accessible
in this geometry because a defined slit-pore confinement is established
only at the very center of the crossed cylinders.The group of Seeck at PETRA III designed two different X-SFAs in
plane–plane geometry (Figure g).[91,92] In their current version, confining
walls are made of two diamond single crystals commonly used for diamond
anvil cells. With a maximum possible force of 100 N applied to the
200-μm-diameter diamond culets in the crystallographic (100)
direction, pressures of up to 3 GPa can be reached to obtain molecular-scale
confinement. Parallel alignment of the opposing macroscopic planar
interfaces can be rather challenging. Furthermore, in some cases the
information extracted from the scattering patterns is limited by the
diamonds’ surface roughness of approximately 1 nm rms (root
mean square) and up to 1.4 nm peak-to-valley. In X-ray scattering
and specular reflectivity experiments on confined liquidpan class="Chemical">benzene,
a gap thickness down to 5 nm was reached.[92] In an experiment on carbon tetrachloride, crystal–liquid
coexistence was found in slit-pore confinement[93]
Recently, a device enabling shear measurements while performing
X-ray experiments was realized by Kurihara’s group.[94] Using a crossed-cylinder geometry, scattering
experiments probe the molecular structure parallel to the two confining
surfaces.For neutron scattering experiments, devices usually feature large
confined areas to accommodate large beam footprints. Sizes up to square
centimeters might aggravate a reproducible and precise confinement
over the entire area. Particles trapped in confinement are prone to
corrupt measurements. The larger the confined areas, the more challenging
the elimination of contaminants.Kuhl’s group succeeded in creating a 100 nm slit-pore confinement
with ±15 nm local deviations.[95,96] Their cell
allows shear experiments in the frequency range between 0.001 and
20 Hz. This setup was primarily used to investigate confined polymer
films.[97]Another instrument used to study the structure of confined soft
matter films upon applying a controlled external pressure using neutron
reflectometry was developed by de Vos et al.[98] Here, confinement down to the nanometer level and over large areas
is achieved by an inflatable flexible membrane approach. With this
approach, they probed the effects of confinement on a poly(vinyl pyrrolidone)
gel layer in water, a polyelectrolyte multilayer in water, and the
lamellar structures of a D2O swollen stack of supported
lipid bilayers. Over the last few years, it has been demonstrated
that this setup can provide detailed insight into the equilibrium
structure of confined soft matter at known confining pressures. Various
studies on polyelectrolyte brushes and lipid bilayers[99−102] have been reported. However, the instrument does not allow for lateral
motion of the confining surfaces against each other.Changes in the interfacial profiles of hexadecane under shear rates
of up to 1000 Hz have been studied by neutron reflectivity in a cone–plate
rheometer.[103−105] As an alternative setup at P10, PETRA III
using a modified plate–plate rheometer was employed to study
the influence of shear forces on the structure of bulk liquids by
X-ray scattering techniques.[106,107] However, because of
their large sample thicknesses most instruments based on conventional
rheometers are not able to reach high enough shear rates to detect
fast interfacial relaxation processes on the molecular length scale
such as adsorption and desorption.[108,109]In this article, we present a novel design for an X-SFA in cylinder-on-flat
geometry (Figure f)
for in-plane scattering (Figure b) and specular XRR (Figure c). Data, obtained in these complementary
scattering geometries, caries information on the normal and lateral
molecular arrangement of soft matter in slit-pore confinement. Furthermore,
compared to the crossed cylinder geometry (Figure d), the cylinder-on-flat geometry provides
significantly more confined sample volume for scattering experiments.
Using white light interferometry, this device can realize a controlled
confinement in slit-pore geometry with gap thicknesses D ranging from several 10 μm down to the 10 nm length scale.
The instrument is able to apply lateral (shear stress) and vertical
(compression/decompression) relative motion of the confining solids
and monitor structural changes in situ. Simultaneously, normal and
frictional forces can be measured by strain gauges. Thus, X-SFA experiments
can provide complementary information to force–distance measurements
and conventional X-ray and neutron scattering studies in nanoporous
materials. In particular, our new X-SFA can be used to study relaxation
processes by driving the system out of equilibrium by shear stress
or compression and decompression.
X-ray Surface Forces Apparatus
General Design
In our new X-SFA setup (Figures and 4), confinement is realized between a stationary upper planar surface
and a cylindrically curved lower surface in a flat-on-cylinder geometry
(Figure f). Both surfaces
in direct contact with the liquid are atomically smooth with a roughnesses
below 0.5 nm rms (Figure S2). Their surface
properties can be tuned by functionalization with self-assembled monolayers
(SAMs).
Figure 3
Photography of the X-SFA setup mounted on the HEMD diffractometer
(1) at ID31 ESRF. Lines indicate optical (white and green light) and
X-ray (red) beam paths. The SFA with the confined liquid (inset) is
located at the diffractometer’s rotation center inside a helium-filled
stainless steel chamber (2). X-rays enter and leave the chamber nearly
horizontally through 80 μm Kapton windows (3) and are recorded
on 2D detectors (4). White light from a fiber light source (5) is
fed in via a mirror from below. The microscope objective (6), beam
splitter (7), top-view CCD camera (8), and spectrometer (9) are mounted
above the sample chamber on the upper instrument level.
Figure 4
Schematic of the X-SFA setup including double-cantilever springs
with strain gauges and optics for recording Newton’s interference
and fringes of equal chromatic order (FECO). (a) Top view of the confined
8CB by video microscopy indicating perfect parallel alignment of the
opposing surfaces. (b) FECOs are used to determine the gap width.
Photography of the X-SFA setup mounted on the HEMD diffractometer
(1) at ID31 ESRF. Lines indicate optical (white and green light) and
X-ray (red) beam paths. The SFA with the confined liquid (inset) is
located at the diffractometer’s rotation center inside a helium-filled
stainless steel chamber (2). X-rays enter and leave the chamber nearly
horizontally through 80 μm Kapton windows (3) and are recorded
on 2D detectors (4). White light from a fiber light source (5) is
fed in via a mirror from below. The microscope objective (6), beam
splitter (7), top-view CCD camera (8), and spectrometer (9) are mounted
above the sample chamber on the upper instrument level.Schematic of the X-SFA setup including double-cantilever springs
with strain gauges and optics for recording Newton’s interference
and fringes of equal chromatic order (FECO). (a) Top view of the confined
8CB by video microscopy indicating perfect parallel alignment of the
opposing surfaces. (b) FECOs are used to determine the gap width.As a stationary upper surface, we use an atomically smooth template
stripped gold layer on a corundum (Al2O3) single
crystal (Figure S1).[110−113] A thin mica sheet, back coated with a semitransparent silver mirror,
serves as a nonstationary (moving horizontal/lateral) surface. For
mechanical support, the mica sheet is glued on a glass cylinder (radius
of curvature 10 mm, apex length 10 mm) by epoxy resin. Preparation
procedures and material parameters for both surfaces are provided
in the Supporting Information (SI).The incident X-ray beam enters through the side of the upper substrate
in the direction of the cylinder apex. This avoids scattering artifacts
from the mica edges. The Al2O3 single crystal
reduces background scattering from the substrate. Because in reflection
geometry the beam has to penetrate several millimeters of Al2O3, high-energy X-rays are essential.[114−116]Because of the elasticity of the hardened epoxy resin, the mica
sheet can adapt to the planar nonstationary surface when pressed against
each other. This generates a slit pore with length l = 4.8 mm defined by the crystal size and width w ≈ 80 μm depending on the applied pressure. Thus, the
cylinder-on-flat geometry provides a confined area that is much larger
than for conventional crossed-cylinder setups (Figure d). In in-plane scattering geometry (Figure b), the X-ray beam
illuminates a sample volume of 10–3 mm3 at a slit-pore gap width of D ≈ 2.5 μm.
This volume is about 10 to 50 times larger compared to that of other
X-SFA setups in reflection geometry,[88,92] with the caveat
of difficult alignment.The SFA is mounted inside of a cylindrical gastight stainless steel
chamber (Figure ).
A helium atmosphere increases the thermal stability of the setup (±0.05
°C during an 8 h shift, ±0.01 °C during a 15 min experiment)
by improving heat dissial">pation from the visible light absorbed in the
sample. Moreover, helium reduces the scattering background. The relative
humidity (r.h.) inside the chamber can be controlled to between 0
and 90% with ±3% stability by a humidifier inserted in the helium
stream, constantly purging the chamber.
The alignment of the nanometer confinement in cylinder-on-flat
geometry is measured and controlled using an interference microscope
based on multiple-beam white-light interferometry (Figure b). A goniometer is used to
orient the apex of the cylindrical disc in parallel with the flat
surface. Successful alignment is characterized by the shape of the
interference pattern (Newton’s rings) in the transmitted beam
(Figure a). By tilting,
the interference pattern is optimized from parabolic curves to parallel
straight lines. To achieve such alignment over the entire area confined
by the opposing interfaces, mica surfaces are glued to a cylindrical
support to avoid wrinkling. To provide adequate stiffness, mica sheets
are ideally 8 to 10 μm thick.Micrometer screws are used to manually adjust the surfaces to a
few micrometers of separation. For dynamic studies, the cylindrical
surface can be moved normally and laterally against the stationary
planar surface with nanometer precision using piezoelectric transducers.
Horizontal sliding motion is aligned in the direction of the cylindrical
contact. This maintains the confined area in the rotation center of
the diffractometer and the X-ray beam. Strain gauges are used for
simultaneously recording forces in both lateral and normal directions.Figure S3 displays typical force versus
distance and force versus time characteristics recorded with the X-SFA
in slit-pore geometry. The maximum applied pressure is determined
by the chosen combination of the piezo travel range, cantilever spring
constant, and elasticity of the glue. This limits the recording of
constant-approach-rate force–distance characteristics to approximately D = 200 nm. For highly viscous liquids, smaller gap widths
can be achieved by applying periodic compression/decompression cycles
(Figure a). Using
this technique, a minimum distance of 110 nm corresponding to less
than 40 smectic 8CB layers was reached. For water, a 7 nm confinement
can be prepared at comparable compression forces using the same components.
Figure 10
Cyclic compression/decompression experiment at gap width 107 nm
≤ D ≤ 120 nm (trapezoidal force profile,
20 mN amplitude, 2 s ramp). (a) Time evolution of the gap distance
(black) and normalized specular XRR signal I(q) (red) during 64 s compression/decompression
periods. White areas indicate compression, and gray areas, decreased
pressure. (b) Relative change in gap width ΔD(t) during compression (blue triangles down) and
decompression (red triangles up) periods n = 1 (dark),
3 (medium), and 6 (light). (c) Overall step heights ΔD(n) extracted from gap widths averaged
over the last 10 s of the holding time of subsequent half cycles.
In-Situ X-ray Scattering and Reflectivity
X-ray scattering
experiments have been performed at the high-energy beamline for buried
interface structure and materials processing ID31 at the ESRF-European
Synchrotron Radiation Facility, Grenoble, France. Figure shows a sketch of the beamline
layout and X-ray optics. The X-ray beam from a cpmU22 undulator is
parallelized by the first CRL transfocator (TF1)[117,118] and monochromized by two multilayer mirrors (MLM, energy 70.0 keV).
A second CRL transfocator (TF2) focuses the beam onto the sample position
with a 5 × 20 μm2 spot size normal and parallel
to the slit pore, respectively. To minimize the radiation dose on
the sample, a seven-stage absorber (poly(methyl methacrylate), PA)
and fast shutter (FS) are used.
Figure 5
Beamline setup for high-energy scattering experiments at ID31 ESRF
(Feb 2016): (OH1/2) optics hutches; (EH) experimental hutch; (U22)
22 mm periode permanent magnet in-vacuum undulator; (GA) gas absorber
(1 m argon at 300 mbar); (HPS1/2/3) high power slits; (TF1/2) compound
refractive lens (CRL) transfocators; (MLM) horizontal multilayer double
monochromator in fixed-exit geometry; (PA) PEEK (polyether ether ketone)
absorber set; (FS) rotary fast shutter; (BS) beam safety shutter;
(T) flight tubes; (SS) secondary slits; (MD) silicon PIN monitor diode;
(HEMD) high-energy microdiffraction setup; (S) sample position; (CS)
collimator slits; (DS) detector slits; (DD) silicon PIN detector diode;
and (D) 2D detector (CdTe MAXIPIX). Distances are not to scale.
Beamline setup for high-energy scattering experiments at ID31 ESRF
(Feb 2016): (OH1/2) optics hutches; (EH) experimental hutch; (U22)
22 mm periode permanent magnet in-vacuum undulator; (GA) gas absorber
(1 m argon at 300 mbar); (HPS1/2/3) high power slits; (TF1/2) compound
refractive lens (CRL) transfocators; (MLM) horizontal multilayer double
monochromator in fixed-exit geometry; (PA) PEEK (polyether ether ketone)
absorber set; (FS) rotary fast shutter; (BS) beam safety shutter;
(T) flight tubes; (SS) secondary slits; (MD) silicon PIN monitor diode;
(HEMD) high-energy microdiffraction setup; (S) sample position; (CS)
collimator slits; (DS) detector slits; (DD) silicon PIN detector diode;
and (D) 2D detector (CdTe MAXIPIX). Distances are not to scale.For sample positioning and orientation, the X-SFA was mounted onto
the six-circle high-energy microdiffractometer (HEMD) setup for surface
and interface studies.[115,116] Scattering intensities
are alternatively detected by two 2D hybride pixel detectors. For
XRR experiments requiring the detection of scattering and XRR signals
with low background, a CdTe MAXIPIX system (256 pixels × 256
pixels, 55 μm pixel size) is mounted on the HEMD detector stage
behind a collimation system (CS, DS). The Dectris PILATUS 3 X CdTe
2 M detector (1478 pixels × 1679 pixels, 172 μm pixel size),
behind a beam stop (not shown) to absorb the primary and specular
reflected beam, is mounted on a dolmen-like granite construction[119] to cover a wide q range.Sample degradation is a common problem in experiments using high-brillant
synchrotron radiation.[120] The absorbed
photons affect samples via a complex cascade.[121] However, this so-called radiation damage is related to
the absorbed X-ray dose. For soft matter, the absorbed dose per incident
X-ray photon exhibits a minimum between 40 and 80 keV.[21,122] Experiments indicated that near solid/liquid and solid/solid interfaces
X-rays absorbed not only by soft matter but also near the hard substrate
surface have to be considered.[123] Therefore,
under high energies X-ray illumination soft matter samples near solid
interfaces tend to be much more stable compared to X-ray energies
below 20 keV where most conventional scattering experiments are performed.Although references from previous similar work might provide some
hints, a quantitative prediction of the sample stability in a given
experiment is difficult. For example, silane oils such as tetrakis(trimethylsiloxy)silane,
tetrakis(2-ethylhexoxy)silane, decamethylcyclopentasiloxane,
and octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane might decompose
in the X-ray beam so quickly that time-resolved experiments in confinement
could be difficult.To probe buried interfaces in XRR, the high-energy X-ray beam impinges
on the slit pore through the side of the corundum single crystal (Figure S1, length 4.8 mm, X-ray transmission
68%). Background scattering from the single-crystalline substrates
is primarily caused by Compton and thermal diffuse scattering and
is significantly reduced compared to that of amorphous materials.
At the critical angle qc = 0.77 nm–1 of gold, the footprint on the substrate is 4.8 mm.Density profiles perpendicular to the confining interfaces were
investigated by X-ray reflectivity (XRR) (Figure c). During XRR experiments R(q) with varying incident
angle α, the entire X-SFA setup is tilted by the HEMD diffractometer.
Scattering experiments at α = 0 and with the momentum transfer q parallel to the slit pore probe the in-plane structure
of the confined liquid (Figure b). Scattering angles were converted to momentum transfer
using .
Structure and Dynamics in Confined 8CB
Smectic Liquid Crystal 8CB
As model system, we choose
liquid crystal (LC) 4′-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl (8CB). Liquid
crystal 8CB has been extensively studied using crossed-cylinder SFAs
and X-SFAs in transmission geometry.[78−81,124,125] Compared to other systems, it
exhibits a relatively high stability under intense X-ray illumination and has
been shown to be an ideal system for assessing the capabilities of
an X-SFA.At 22 °C, 8CB exhibits a smectic A (SmA) phase
(Figure ). 8CB is
known to form dimers by the π–π stacking of adjacent
phenyl rings. This leads to a dimer dimension larger than a single
8CB molecule (Figure ).[37] The lamellar arrangement of the rod-shaped
8CB dimers in smectic layers gives rise to a pronounced scattering
peak in the small-angle scattering (SAXS) regime. In 8CB, bulk measurements
showed that shear stress induces alignment and a reduction of defects
and initiates the growth of smectic grains.[107] For shorter homologue 6CB, resonance shear measurements in confinement
detected an increase in viscosity for D < 20 nm.[126] Below 12.5 ± 1.3 nm, the orientation of
the confined molecules was so large and the rigidity was so high that
the LC structure could not be distorted by electric fields.
Figure 6
Rod-shaped (calamitic) structure of 4′-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl
(8CB) dimers (left) and molecular alignment in the liquid-crystalline
smectic A phase (right).
Rod-shaped (calamitic) structure of 4′-octyl-4-cyano-biphenyl
(8CB) dimers (left) and molecular alignment in the liquid-crystalline
smectic A phase (right).Here, aside from static XRR and in-plane scattering on the LC structure
in slit-pore confinement, time-resolved experiments were carried out
during compression and decompression cycles. Furthermore, the recorded
X-ray scattering and reflectivity data was complemented by simultaneous
interferometry-based thickness measurements. Therefore, in contrast
to static X-SFA[125] and macroscopic dynamic
experiments,[107] our setup provides direct
access to the structural relaxation dynamics of the confined LC. To
study confined structures over a wide gap range, data was taken at D = 1700 nm and 120 nm gap widths. For a defined orientation
of the 8CB molecules at the upper and lower interfaces, both confining
surfaces were hydrophobized by self-assembled monolayers of hexadecane-thiol
and octadecyl-trichlorosilane, respectively. From work by the Israelachvili
group, it is known that in such hydrophobized slit pores the long
axis of 8CB dimers is aligned parallel to the surface normal.[37]
Static Structure of 8CB in Confinement
Figure a shows in-plane scattering
data at D = 1700 nm. In in-plane scattering geometry,
experiments recording I(q∥) with momentum transfer are sensitive to the structure in the x–y plane (i.e., parallel to the
solid/liquid interface (Figure b)).
Figure 7
Scattering signal from confined 8CB. (a) In-plane pattern I(q∥) recorded in the
scattering geometry depicted in Figure b. (b) Measured (red) specular X-ray reflectivity R(q). Model
calculated reflectivity curve (purple, vertically shifted by 1 order
of magnitude) from a periodic arrangement of 560 smectic 8CB layers
arranged with their long axis perpendicular to the solid/liquid interface.
Scattering signal from confined 8CB. (a) In-plane pattern I(q∥) recorded in the
scattering geometry depicted in Figure b. (b) Measured (red) specular X-ray reflectivity R(q). Model
calculated reflectivity curve (purple, vertically shifted by 1 order
of magnitude) from a periodic arrangement of 560 smectic 8CB layers
arranged with their long axis perpendicular to the solid/liquid interface.Qualitatively, the recorded data exhibits the characteristic scattering
pattern of a LC in the SmA bulk phase.[127,128] The sharp
diffraction peak (I) at qI = 2.0 nm–1 corresponds to a real-space distance. This periodicity compares
well to the periodicity of 3.2 nm for the SmA mesophase of 8CB confined
in between two hydrophobized surfaces as observed in SFA experiments.[37] Therefore, it is assigned to the long axis of
an 8CB dimer, defining the periodicity of the quasi-long-range-ordered
liquid-crystalline smectic layers (Figure ). Around qII = 14 nm–1 a second, broad diffuse peak (II) appears.
Its 0.45 nm periodicity corresponds to the average lateral distance
between neighboring rod-shaped 8CB dimers within the same smectic
layer. The large FWHM of 4 nm–1 originates from
the short-range order perpendicular to the long axis of the 8CB dimers.However, on the quantitative level remarkable differences with
respect to nontextured bulk samples are observed. In the bulk, the
integrated intensities of the sharp (I) and diffuse (II) peaks are
of the same magnitude. In contrast, the recorded scattering pattern
(Figure a) shows a
much larger area under peak II. This is the first indication that
the director of the confined LC exhibits a preferred orientation parallel
to the interface normal.Specular reflectivity I(q) probes the density profile perpendicular
to the solid/liquid interface (Figure b, red curve). The critical angle of total reflection
at 0.768 nm–1 is given by the large scattering contrast
between the gold mirror and the Al2O3 block.
At higher q, the X-ray
beam is transmitted into the gold layer and the 8CB filled slit pore. Kiessig fringes of periodicity Δq = 0.15 nm–1 originate from interference at the
40-nm-thick gold layer. At approximately 2 nm–1,
a sharp Bragg-like peak is observed. As observed for peak I in in-plane
scattering geometry (Figure a), this reflection is attributed to the smectic order (i.e.,
the dimension of the long axis of 8CB dimers). For comparison, the
purple curve in Figure b shows a calculated XRR curve based on a simplified model consisting
of 1700 nm 8CB (i.e., 560 smectic layers with 3.2 nm periodicity)
adjacent to a semi-infinite gold substrate.At peak I around 2 nm–1, intensities recorded
under the specular condition (i.e., with the momentum transfer perpendicular
to the solid/liquid interface (z direction)) are
more than 4 orders of magnitude higher compared to the in-plane scattering
along q∥ (Figure S7). The recorded XRR signal at the peak maximum is about twice
the intensity of the interpolated Kiessig fringes originating from
the gold layer. Likewise, 2D scattering data show a pronounced maximum
in and around the specular direction (Figure a,c). The observed angular intensity distribution
over the scattering rings of constant total momentum transfer originates from the confinement-induced
anisotropic orientation of the LC director. The observed scattering
patterns indicate that the smectic 8CB layers are preferably arranged
with their long axis perpendicular to the solid/liquid interfaces.
This layered structure can now be stressed by compression and decompression
exerted on the confined LC structure by moving the lower mica cylinder
in the vertical direction (inset of Figure ).
Figure 8
Dynamic compression/decompression experiments at D ≈ 1700 nm. (a) Two-dimensional scattering patterns around the specular
condition. The arc is located at qI =
2.0 nm–1. (b) Time evolution of compressive stress
(black, 8 s ramp, 60 s holding time, 136 s period, 20 mN force amplitude),
the specular XRR SmA first-order signal (red, qI = 2.0 nm–1, q direction), the in-plane-scattering SmA first-order
signal (green, qI = 2.0 nm–1, q∥ direction), and the in-plane
scattering diffuse signal (blue, qII =
14 nm–1, q∥ direction).
Curves are scaled and vertically shifted for clarity. White areas
indicate compression, and gray areas, decreased pressure. (c) Two-dimensional
pattern in the in-plane direction. The arc is located at qI = 2.0 nm–1. Areas in the vertical
scattering direction are masked to protect the detector from high
intensities. Time stamps are numbered 1 to 5.
Dynamic compression/decompression experiments at D ≈ 1700 nm. (a) Two-dimensional scattering patterns around the specular
condition. The arc is located at qI =
2.0 nm–1. (b) Time evolution of compressive stress
(black, 8 s ramp, 60 s holding time, 136 s period, 20 mN force amplitude),
the specular XRR SmA first-order signal (red, qI = 2.0 nm–1, q direction), the in-plane-scattering SmA first-order
signal (green, qI = 2.0 nm–1, q∥ direction), and the in-plane
scattering diffuse signal (blue, qII =
14 nm–1, q∥ direction).
Curves are scaled and vertically shifted for clarity. White areas
indicate compression, and gray areas, decreased pressure. (c) Two-dimensional
pattern in the in-plane direction. The arc is located at qI = 2.0 nm–1. Areas in the vertical
scattering direction are masked to protect the detector from high
intensities. Time stamps are numbered 1 to 5.
Relaxation Dynamics
After the experiments at a constant
gap width, we now present the structural relaxation dynamics of confined
8CB that was brought out of equilibrium by periodic compression and
decompression cycles. Changes in the gap width D(t) are continuously monitored by the FECO interference pattern.
Simultaneously, the arrangement of the 8CB molecules is
probed in real time using specular XRR or X-ray scattering.At a D = 1700 nm gap width, confinement corresponds
to about 560 smectic layers of 8CB dimers (Figure ). A symmetric trapezoidal compression/decompression
sequence with an 8 s ramp and a 60 s hold time (136 s period) was
applied to the confined liquid. Figure b shows the time evolution over two consecutive periodic
cycles. The topmost black curve depicts the compression/decompression
process. Gray shaded areas indicate decompression, and white areas,
compression. The red curve shows the specular XRR signal at qI = 2.0 nm–1 with the momentum
transfer pointing in the z direction (Figure b). Green and blue curves show
the in-plane (x–y plane, Figure a) scattering intensities
at momentum transfers of qI = 2.0 nm–1 (peak I) and qII = 14
nm–1 (peak II), respectively. XRR and scattering
data were extracted from the 2D MAXIPIX data sets by integration over
a region of interest of 10 × 10 detector pixels (solid angle
1.5 × 10–7 sr).All recorded signal intensities exhibit a strong periodic time
dependence following the applied stress. At t = 0
s, the confinement gap is opening. During the 8 s decompression intervals,
the specular intensity drops below 60% (Figure S7, red curve). At the same time, the in-plane scattering intensity
of peak I is increasing by a factor of 5 (Figure S7, green curve) whereas that of peak II is decreasing below
85% (Figure S7, blue curve). Upon subsequent
compression (t = 68 s), the opposite behavior is
observed. While XRR and in-plane peak II intensities are increasing,
the in-plane peak I signal decreases. This indicates that upon compression/decompression
the signal modulation is not dominated by the amount of 8CB inside
the slit pore. Instead, scattering intensities are redistributed over
rings of constant momentum transfer.More insight into the redistribution of scattering intensities
is obtained from the 2D scattering patterns. Figure shows a selection of 2D detector images
recorded around the specular condition (Figure a) and in the in-plane direction (Figure c). During compression
intervals (time stamp 2 and white areas), we observe a sharp specular
peak. Low intensity is found in the perpendicular in-plane direction.
For decompression segments (time stamps 1 and 5), the situation is
reversed. Around the decreasing specular peak, tails emerge along
the diffraction ring. Moreover, the scattering intensity is redistributed
in off-specular directions where signal intensities increase (Figure S6). The intensity of broad scattering
peak II at q∥ = 14 nm–1 in the in-plane direction (blue curve) shows inverse signal modulation.
This is readily explained by the local anisotropy in the SmA phase
of the rod-shaped 8CB dimers. Here, the long period exhibiting quasi-long-range
order (low q, peak I) is oriented vertically. Perpendicular
to this long axis, we have liquidlike short-range order with shorter
periodicity (high q, peak II).The observed redistribution of scattering intensities between specular
and in-plane directions indicates that the degree of orientational
order is strongly affected by compression and decompression (Figure ). LC domains not
aligned in the preferred orientation with respect to the interfaces
possess grain boundaries with respect to the aligned majority domain.
Grain boundary energy makes these misaligned domains energetically
unstable. However, under static conditions, misaligned domains can
be kinetically trapped. During compression, material is squeezed in
the x and y directions out of the
gap. This flow induces a dynamic into the system that helps to overcome
energy barriers for defect migration. In particular, the layer structure
of misaligned domains with the director pointing in the flow direction
will be distorted by shear. In contrast, layers with their normal
parallel z direction remain intact and accommodate
the 8CB dimers of the reducing misaligned domains. Therefore, the
overall alignment of smectic layers parallel to the confining interfaces
increases.
Figure 9
Sketch of the molecular structure of confined 8CB. The functionalized
solid surfaces (blue) induce an orientation with the LC director parallel
to the interface normal (brown). Grain boundary energies make misaligned
domains (red) energetically unstable. However, they can gradually
adjust in height during slit-pore opening. During compression, these
8CB dimers get integrated into the majority domain (brown), leading
to an overall increase in alignment.
Sketch of the molecular structure of confined 8CB. The functionalized
solid surfaces (blue) induce an orientation with the LC director parallel
to the interface normal (brown). Grain boundary energies make misaligned
domains (red) energetically unstable. However, they can gradually
adjust in height during slit-pore opening. During compression, these
8CB dimers get integrated into the majority domain (brown), leading
to an overall increase in alignment.During decompression, 8CB dimers leave the interface-aligned smectic
layers to fill the extra space. Newly developing domains with the
director perpendicular to the surface normal can adjust their height
to the gradually opening slit pore. This explains the strong 5-fold
intensity increase of peak I at qI = 2.0
nm–1 in the in-plane direction (Figure S7, green curve). A similar orientation of 8CB dimers
perpendicular to the majority domain has been observed in simulations.[129] They belong to so-called parking-lot states
that occur as transition states when rod-shaped 8CB dimers diffuse
from one smectic layer to the other.Further information on the dynamics of structure formation is obtained
from the relaxation of the scattering signal following compression and decompression.
After decompression is completed, the specular intensity is gradually
recovered (Figure b, red curve, time stamps 1 and 5). With a relaxation time scale
of approximately 20 s, the signal is converging toward a plateau value
during the 60 s holding time. However, a degree of orientational order
comparable to what was observed after compression is not regained.
Likewise, during compression, clear relaxation processes on comparable
time scales were observes for peak I and II in the in-plane direction
(Figure b, green and
blue curves, time stamp 2).The observed time scale is about 8 orders of magnitude slower compared
to the molecular relaxation time for intersmectic layer correlations
in the bulk.[130] In liquids confined on
the molecular length scale, a slowdown in dynamics by 8 orders of
magnitude was reported.[41] However, the
1700 nm slit pore contains about 560 smectic layers. Therefore, we
suggest that the observed time scale originates from collective dynamics
such as domain reorientation.After discussing the results obtained for a gap width greater than
1 μm, we now present experiments at gap sizes below 120 nm.
This confinement gap amounts to an equivalent of less than 40 smectic
8CB layers. At this distance, the gap width can be precisely measured
by FECO.Figure a shows the results from an XRR measurement (red curve)
recored during periodic compression/decompression cycles. A trapezoidal
force profile (amplitude 20 mN) with a 2 s ramp, 30 s holding time,
and 64 s period was applied. Over five full compression/decompression
cycles, the gap distance (black curve) decreases by approximately
10 nm. As observed for the 1700 nm slit pore, compression results
in an increase in the specular XRR signal (white areas) while intensities
decrease for decompression (gray areas).Cyclic compression/decompression experiment at gap width 107 nm
≤ D ≤ 120 nm (trapezoidal force profile,
20 mN amplitude, 2 s ramp). (a) Time evolution of the gap distance
(black) and normalized specular XRR signal I(q) (red) during 64 s compression/decompression
periods. White areas indicate compression, and gray areas, decreased
pressure. (b) Relative change in gap width ΔD(t) during compression (blue triangles down) and
decompression (red triangles up) periods n = 1 (dark),
3 (medium), and 6 (light). (c) Overall step heights ΔD(n) extracted from gap widths averaged
over the last 10 s of the holding time of subsequent half cycles.During initial compression, the gap size decreases by ΔD↓ = −3.7 nm (Figure c). This distance is similar
to the dimension of 3.2 nm for the long axis of an 8CB dimer (peak
I). Therefore, we conclude that during initial compression a full
smectic 8CB layer is squeezed out of the slit-pore. However, during
decompression the gap opens by only ΔD↑ = +0.7 nm. This value corresponds to the short axis
of an 8CB dimer (peak II). Accordingly, after decompression, domains
with the director perpendicular to the interface normal were observed
for the 1700 nm slit pore.During subsequent compression events, the change in gap width decreases
monotonically to ΔD↓ = −2.3 nm
(Figure b). In contrast,
during decompression ΔD↑ increases
to +1.3 nm. Hence, the overall decrease in gap width per compression/decompression
cycle is decreasing with time. During decompression, domains with
the long axis lying parallel to the confining surfaces emerge. This
indicates the formation of domains that get periodically reoriented
during subsequent compression/decompression cycles.Unlike for the 1700 nm slit pore, no clear relaxation processes
indicating reorientation are observed by XRR. Likewise, after the
2 s decompression ramp only minor gap width changes were detected
during the subsequent 10 s holding time (Figure b). This indicates that for the small gap
width of 120 nm, corresponding to less than 40 smectic 8CB layers,
and on the minute time scale defects are largely trapped. Likewise,
Nakano et al. reported a relaxation time on the order of 1 h for confined
8CB under pressure.[125] Therefore, external
stimuli are required to overcome energy barriers and induce domain
reorientation.
Conclusions and Outlook
X-SFA in Cylinder-on-Flat Geometry
Over the last few
decades, several groups presented scientific instruments to investigate
the molecular-scale structure of fluids, confined inside a slit pore,
by X-ray and neutron scattering techniques. Reviewing the capabilities
of the complementary designs, we motivate the need for a novel approach
that allowsthe study of the structure of soft matter in slit pores
parallel and perpendicular to the confining interfaces by specular
XRR and X-ray scattering,control of the slit-pore gap distance on the micrometer-to-nanometer
length scale,simultaneous measurements of the normal and tangential
forces acting on the confining interfaces while recording X-ray scattering
data, andan investigation of the relaxation dynamics of a system
that was brought out of equilibrium by compression/decompression or
shear stress in time-resolved experiments.On the basis of geometry considerations, we came up
with a novel X-SFA using the cylinder-on-flat geometry. This design
can fulfill all of the requirements outlined above in a single instrument.
Compared to previous X-SFA designs, the cylinder-on-flat geometry
allows us to increase the amount of illuminated confined sample volume
by more than 1 order of magnitude. Thus, the described instrument
is no longer limited to static measurements. In addition, time-resolved
scattering experiments with high temporal resolution become feasible.
At the same time, the X-ray dose deposited on the sample is kept at
an acceptable level.An advantage of the new X-SFA instrument is its capability for dynamic in situ studies
on the response of a confined liquid after an external stimulus. The
system can be brought out of equilibrium by shear stress or compression
and decompression of the slit pore. Subsequently, structural relaxation
dynamics are recorded by scattering techniques. At the same time,
force and distance measurements provide complementary information
on the dynamics of the system under sliding conditions.[36,37,82]The feasibility of the new X-SFA geometry was demonstrated by experiments
on the smectic LC 8CB. The X-SFA can be employed to create and control
slit-pore confinement on the 10 nm length scale while simultaneously
determining the molecular-scale structure of soft matter by X-ray
scattering techniques. Furthermore, it enables the probing of structural
relaxation dynamics of confined LC mesophases under stress.
Scientific Research Directions
Possible fields for
future studies include systems that exhibit anisotropic nonequilibrium
structures that are induced by shear forces. Shear forces can induce
an orientation in confined liquids and modify their phase stability.
For macromolecules, large anisotropic molecules, and LCs, such effects
are already well-known.[107,126] However, compared
to classical rheometers, a SFA can provide higher shear rates. This
allows studies on confined liquids with lower viscosity and faster
dynamics. Examples include water and short-chain alkanes, in which
the influence of shear on the interfacial structure is still under
debate.[104,105,131]Moreover,
the structure and dynamics of confined liquids play crucial roles
in topics ranging from energy materials to environmental sciences.
Examples include subjects related to the spreading of surfactants,
wetting dynamics, electrolytes in electric double-layer caal">pacitors
and batteries, and the structure and dynamics of confined polymer
melts. In nanotribology, open questions such as friction and abrasive
behavior on the nanometer length scale can be addressed.[132]
A particularly interesting research direction includes studies
on confined complex electrolytes such as ionic liquids and complex
solvent mixtures. These materials exhibit structural heterogeneities
on the nanometer length scale.[6,7,9,30,133] At solid/liquid[25,134,135] and liquid/vapor interfaces,[19,29,136,137] layered structures have been
observed. Therefore, it is anticipated that confinement can have strong
influences on IL structures[138−140] and dynamics.[141,142]
Future Instrument Developments
Aside from shear and
normal forces (Figure e), other stimuli can be employed to drive a confined system out
of equilibrium. Examples include the application of an electrical
potential (Figure f). This provides the ability to investigate the dynamics of interfacial
hydration layers and the adsorption and desorption of ions in solution.
Another possibility is short light pulses. They can be used to rapidly
increase temperature to study phase transitions in confinement.
Alternatively, light can be used to switch the conformation of molecules
such as azobenzenes. Subsequently, the structural response of the
confined system to conformational changes can be investigated.With the upcoming upgrades of synchrotron radiation sources to diffraction-limited
storage rings[45,46] entirely new types of scattering
experiments will become feasible. Currently, typical beam sizes for
high-energy X-rays at PETRA III and ESRF are in the range of 10 μm
horizontally and 5 μm vertically. After the ESRF EBS upgrade,
the projected beam size at ID31 will be 1 μm × 200 nm (horizontal
× vertical) at a 15-times higher flux compared to the current
flux. For X-SFA experiments, we foresee the potential for two important
breakthroughs that are beyond current capabilities.Currently, typical vertical beam sizes are compatible with the
approximately 100-μm-wide homogeneous slit pores formed by pressing
a flexible, supported mica cylinder onto a rigid, flat substrate.
However, we anticial">pate that in the future hard material SFA contacts
among metals, semiconductors, and ceramics will also be interesting
probe systems with high relevance in industrial applications. Because
of their high elastic modulus, these materials cannot adapt to the
opposing flat surface. Therefore, it will be challenging to generate
slit pores with constant gap thicknesses, laterally extending over
more than a few micrometers. Thus, smaller horizontal beam sizes on
the order of 1 μm will be highly beneficial for studying realistic
systems such as wet lubricants between hard matter surfaces.
Second, there is a large amount of interest in the structure and
dynamics of liquids confined between laterally heterogeneous interfaces.
The heterogeneity can be related to the topography (roughness), surface
functionalization (hydrophilic vs hydrophobic), or surface charge
(Figure ). One of
the motivations is to understand the arrangement and mobility of ions
in microporous materials composed of hydrophilic and hydrophobic moieties.
Thus, smaller horizontal beam sizes will open up new experimental
possibilities to answer these kinds of scientific questions.
Figure 11
Smaller vertical beam sizes, available at upcoming diffraction-limited
storage rings, will enable spatially resolved experiments on laterally
inhomogeneous slit pores. Examples include engineered surface topographies
mimicking roughness (left) and hydrophilic vs hydrophobic or negatively
vs positively charged surface patterns (right).
Smaller vertical beam sizes, available at upcoming diffraction-limited
storage rings, will enable spatially resolved experiments on laterally
inhomogeneous slit pores. Examples include engineered surface topographies
mimicking roughness (left) and hydrophilic vs hydrophobic or negatively
vs positively charged surface patterns (right).
Authors: Markus Mezger; Sebastian Schramm; Heiko Schröder; Harald Reichert; Moshe Deutsch; Emerson J De Souza; John S Okasinski; Benjamin M Ocko; Veijo Honkimäki; Helmut Dosch Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2009-09-07 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Markus Mezger; Roland Roth; Heiko Schröder; Peter Reichert; Diego Pontoni; Harald Reichert Journal: J Chem Phys Date: 2015-04-28 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Samuel W Coles; Alexander M Smith; Maxim V Fedorov; Florian Hausen; Susan Perkin Journal: Faraday Discuss Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Eli Sloutskin; Eli Solutskin; Benjamin M Ocko; Lilach Tamam; Lilach Taman; Ivan Kuzmenko; Thomas Gog; Moshe Deutsch Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2005-06-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Zlatko Brkljača; Michael Klimczak; Zoran Miličević; Matthias Weisser; Nicola Taccardi; Peter Wasserscheid; David M Smith; Andreas Magerl; Ana-Sunčana Smith Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 6.475