BACKGROUND: Accountable care organizations (ACOs) have increased their use of patient activation and engagement strategies, but it is unknown whether they achieve better outcomes for patients with comorbid chronic physical and mental health conditions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent to which practices with patient-centered cultures, greater shared decision-making strategies, and better coordination among team members have better patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients with diabetes and/or cardiovascular and comorbid mental health diagnoses. RESEARCH DESIGN: Sixteen practices randomly selected from top and bottom quartiles of a 39-item patient activation/engagement implementation survey of primary care team members (n=411) to assess patient-centered culture, shared decision-making, and relational coordination among team members. These data were linked to survey data on patient engagement and on emotional, physical, and social patient-reported health outcomes. SUBJECTS: Adult patients (n=606) with diabetes, cardiovascular, and comorbid mental health conditions who had at least 1 visit at participating primary care practices of 2 ACOs. MEASURES: Depression/anxiety, physical functioning, social functioning; patient-centered culture, patient activation/engagement implementation, relational coordination. RESULTS: Patients receiving care from practices with high patient-centered cultures reported better physical functioning (0.025) and borderline better emotional functioning (0.059) compared with less patient-centered practices. More activated patients reported better PROs, with higher activation levels partially mediating the relationship of patient-centered culture and better PROs. CONCLUSIONS: ACO patients with comorbid physical and mental health diagnoses report better physical functioning when practices have patient-centered cultures. More activated/engaged patients report better patient emotional, physical, and social health outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Accountable care organizations (ACOs) have increased their use of patient activation and engagement strategies, but it is unknown whether they achieve better outcomes for patients with comorbid chronic physical and mental health conditions. OBJECTIVES: To assess the extent to which practices with patient-centered cultures, greater shared decision-making strategies, and better coordination among team members have better patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients with diabetes and/or cardiovascular and comorbid mental health diagnoses. RESEARCH DESIGN: Sixteen practices randomly selected from top and bottom quartiles of a 39-item patient activation/engagement implementation survey of primary care team members (n=411) to assess patient-centered culture, shared decision-making, and relational coordination among team members. These data were linked to survey data on patient engagement and on emotional, physical, and social patient-reported health outcomes. SUBJECTS: Adult patients (n=606) with diabetes, cardiovascular, and comorbid mental health conditions who had at least 1 visit at participating primary care practices of 2 ACOs. MEASURES: Depression/anxiety, physical functioning, social functioning; patient-centered culture, patient activation/engagement implementation, relational coordination. RESULTS:Patients receiving care from practices with high patient-centered cultures reported better physical functioning (0.025) and borderline better emotional functioning (0.059) compared with less patient-centered practices. More activated patients reported better PROs, with higher activation levels partially mediating the relationship of patient-centered culture and better PROs. CONCLUSIONS: ACO patients with comorbid physical and mental health diagnoses report better physical functioning when practices have patient-centered cultures. More activated/engaged patients report better patient emotional, physical, and social health outcomes.
Authors: Valerie A Lewis; Carrie H Colla; Katherine Tierney; Arica D Van Citters; Elliott S Fisher; Ellen Meara Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jeffrey A Johnson; Fatima Al Sayah; Lisa Wozniak; Sandra Rees; Allison Soprovich; Weiyu Qiu; Constance L Chik; Pierre Chue; Peter Florence; Jennifer Jacquier; Pauline Lysak; Andrea Opgenorth; Wayne Katon; Sumit R Majumdar Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2014-10-14 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Erika L Crable; Catherine A Fullerton; Rachel M Henke; Andriana Hohlbauch; Nicholas Cummings Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Jason Kroening-Roché; Jennifer D Hall; David C Cameron; Ruth Rowland; Deborah J Cohen Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Jane McCusker; Sylvie D Lambert; Martin G Cole; Antonio Ciampi; Erin Strumpf; Ellen E Freeman; Eric Belzile Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2016-05-13
Authors: J H Gittell; K M Fairfield; B Bierbaum; W Head; R Jackson; M Kelly; R Laskin; S Lipson; J Siliski; T Thornhill; J Zuckerman Journal: Med Care Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Stephen M Shortell; Jill A Marsteller; Michael Lin; Marjorie L Pearson; Shin-Yi Wu; Peter Mendel; Shan Cretin; Mayde Rosen Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Matthias Rose; Jakob B Bjorner; Barbara Gandek; Bonnie Bruce; James F Fries; John E Ware Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: James E Bailey; Satya Surbhi; Jim Y Wan; Kiraat D Munshi; Teresa M Waters; Bonnie L Binkley; Michael O Ugwueke; Ilana Graetz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2019-07-03 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Vanessa B Hurley; Yue Wang; Hector P Rodriguez; Stephen M Shortell; Stephen Kearing; Lucy A Savitz Journal: Patient Prefer Adherence Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 2.711