Literature DB >> 35833416

Adoption of Patient Engagement Strategies by Physician Practices in the United States.

Chris Miller-Rosales1, Valerie A Lewis2, Stephen M Shortell3, Hector P Rodriguez3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement strategies can equip patients with tools to navigate treatment decisions and improve patient-centered outcomes. Despite increased recognition about the importance of patient engagement, little is known about the extent of physician practice adoption of patient engagement strategies nationally.
METHODS: We analyzed data collected from the National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems (NSHOS) on physician practice adoption of patient engagement strategies. Stratified-cluster sampling was used to select physician practices operating under different organizational structures. Multivariable linear regression models estimated the association of practice ownership, health information technology functionality, use of screening activities, patient responsiveness, chronic care management processes, and the adoption of patient engagement strategies, including shared decision-making, motivational interviewing, and shared medical appointments. All regression models controlled for participation in payment reforms, practice size, Medicaid revenue percentage, and geographic region.
RESULTS: We found modest and varied adoption of patient engagement strategies by practices of different ownership types, with health system-owned practices having the lowest adoption of ownership types. Practice capabilities, including chronic care management processes, routine screening of medical and social risks, and patient care dissemination strategies were associated with greater practice-level adoption of patient engagement strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: This national study is the first to characterize the adoption of patient engagement strategies by US physician practices. We found modest adoption of shared decision-making and motivational interviewing, and low adoption of shared medical appointments. Risk-based payment reform has the potential to motivate greater practice-level patient engagement, but the extent to which it occurs may depend on internal practice capabilities.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35833416      PMCID: PMC9378564          DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   3.178


  44 in total

1.  What are the facilitators and barriers in physician organizations' use of care management processes?

Authors:  Thomas Bodenheimer; Margaret C Wang; Thomas G Rundall; Stephen M Shortell; Robin R Gillies; Nancy Oswald; Lawrence Casalino; James C Robinson
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Saf       Date:  2004-09

2.  Medicare program; Medicare Shared Savings Program: Accountable Care Organizations. Final rule.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fed Regist       Date:  2011-11-02

3.  Barriers to implementing evidence-based practices in addiction treatment programs: comparing staff reports on Motivational Interviewing, Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach, Assertive Community Treatment, and Cognitive-behavioral Therapy.

Authors:  M Amodeo; L Lundgren; A Cohen; D Rose; D Chassler; C Beltrame; M D'Ippolito
Journal:  Eval Program Plann       Date:  2011-03-21

4.  Innovation in the safety net: integrating community health centers through accountable care.

Authors:  Valerie A Lewis; Carrie H Colla; Karen E Schoenherr; Stephen M Shortell; Elliott S Fisher
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  France Légaré; Holly O Witteman
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.301

6.  Paying the doctor: evidence-based decisions at the point-of-care and the role of fee-for-service incentives.

Authors:  Eugene C Rich; Timothy K Lake; Christal Stone Valenzano; Myles M Maxfield
Journal:  J Comp Eff Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.744

Review 7.  Ten Years, Forty Decision Aids, And Thousands Of Patient Uses: Shared Decision Making At Massachusetts General Hospital.

Authors:  Karen R Sepucha; Leigh H Simmons; Michael J Barry; Susan Edgman-Levitan; Adam M Licurse; Sreekanth K Chaguturu
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 8.  A realist review of shared medical appointments: How, for whom, and under what circumstances do they work?

Authors:  Susan R Kirsh; David C Aron; Kimberly D Johnson; Laura E Santurri; Lauren D Stevenson; Katherine R Jones; Justin Jagosh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Prevalence of Screening for Food Insecurity, Housing Instability, Utility Needs, Transportation Needs, and Interpersonal Violence by US Physician Practices and Hospitals.

Authors:  Taressa K Fraze; Amanda L Brewster; Valerie A Lewis; Laura B Beidler; Genevra F Murray; Carrie H Colla
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-09-04

10.  Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: a case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes.

Authors:  Susan R Kirsh; Renée H Lawrence; David C Aron
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.