Literature DB >> 24698295

The PROMIS Physical Function item bank was calibrated to a standardized metric and shown to improve measurement efficiency.

Matthias Rose1, Jakob B Bjorner2, Barbara Gandek3, Bonnie Bruce4, James F Fries4, John E Ware5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To document the development and psychometric evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) item bank and static instruments. STUDY DESIGN AND
SETTING: The items were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative methods. A total of 16,065 adults answered item subsets (n>2,200/item) on the Internet, with oversampling of the chronically ill. Classical test and item response theory methods were used to evaluate 149 PROMIS PF items plus 10 Short Form-36 and 20 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index items. A graded response model was used to estimate item parameters, which were normed to a mean of 50 (standard deviation [SD]=10) in a US general population sample.
RESULTS: The final bank consists of 124 PROMIS items covering upper, central, and lower extremity functions and instrumental activities of daily living. In simulations, a 10-item computerized adaptive test (CAT) eliminated floor and decreased ceiling effects, achieving higher measurement precision than any comparable length static tool across four SDs of the measurement range. Improved psychometric properties were transferred to the CAT's superior ability to identify differences between age and disease groups.
CONCLUSION: The item bank provides a common metric and can improve the measurement of PF by facilitating the standardization of patient-reported outcome measures and implementation of CATs for more efficient PF assessments over a larger range.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computerized adaptive test; Health status; Item response theory; Patient-reported outcomes; Physical function; Questionnaire

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24698295      PMCID: PMC4465404          DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.10.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  26 in total

1.  Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: a brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales.

Authors:  J E Ware; J B Bjorner; M Kosinski
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Activity outcome measurement for postacute care.

Authors:  Stephen M Haley; Wendy J Coster; Patricia L Andres; Larry H Ludlow; Pengsheg Ni; Tamara L Y Bond; Samuel J Sinclair; Alan M Jette
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Development and validation of the health assessment questionnaire II: a revised version of the health assessment questionnaire.

Authors:  Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud; Theodore Pincus
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2004-10

4.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Equating the MOS SF36 and the LSU HSI Physical Functioning Scales.

Authors:  W P Fisher; R L Eubanks; R L Marier
Journal:  J Outcome Meas       Date:  1997

6.  Comparison of Rasch and summated rating scales constructed from SF-36 physical functioning items in seven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

Authors:  A E Raczek; J E Ware; J B Bjorner; B Gandek; S M Haley; N K Aaronson; G Apolone; P Bech; J E Brazier; M Bullinger; M Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: an application of item response theory to the headache impact test (HIT).

Authors:  Jakob B Bjorner; Mark Kosinski; John E Ware
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Performance profiles of the functional independence measure.

Authors:  C V Granger; B B Hamilton; J M Linacre; A W Heinemann; B D Wright
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.159

9.  Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale.

Authors:  S M Haley; C A McHorney; J E Ware
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Measurement of patient outcome in arthritis.

Authors:  J F Fries; P Spitz; R G Kraines; H R Holman
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1980-02
View more
  110 in total

1.  Operative Intervention Does Not Change Pain Perception in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Olivia V Waldman; Stephanie P Hao; Jeff R Houck; Nicolette J Lee; Judith F Baumhauer; Irvin Oh
Journal:  Clin Diabetes       Date:  2020-04

2.  Pexidartinib versus placebo for advanced tenosynovial giant cell tumour (ENLIVEN): a randomised phase 3 trial.

Authors:  William D Tap; Hans Gelderblom; Emanuela Palmerini; Jayesh Desai; Sebastian Bauer; Jean-Yves Blay; Thierry Alcindor; Kristen Ganjoo; Javier Martín-Broto; Christopher W Ryan; David M Thomas; Charles Peterfy; John H Healey; Michiel van de Sande; Heather L Gelhorn; Dale E Shuster; Qiang Wang; Antoine Yver; Henry H Hsu; Paul S Lin; Sandra Tong-Starksen; Silvia Stacchiotti; Andrew J Wagner
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Pharmacodynamic Study of Miransertib in Individuals with Proteus Syndrome.

Authors:  Kim M Keppler-Noreuil; Julie C Sapp; Marjorie J Lindhurst; Thomas N Darling; Jasmine Burton-Akright; Mohammadhadi Bagheri; Eva Dombi; Ashlyn Gruber; Paul F Jarosinski; Staci Martin; Neera Nathan; Scott M Paul; Ronald E Savage; Pamela L Wolters; Brian Schwartz; Brigitte C Widemann; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Using patient-reported outcomes and PROMIS in research and clinical applications: experiences from the PCORI pilot projects.

Authors:  Clifton O Bingham; Susan J Bartlett; Peter A Merkel; Thelma J Mielenz; Paul A Pilkonis; Lauren Edmundson; Emily Moore; Rajeev K Sabharwal
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Patient-Reported Quality-of-Life Outcome Measures in the Thyroid Cancer Population.

Authors:  Eve M Roth; Carrie C Lubitz; John Shannon Swan; Benjamin C James
Journal:  Thyroid       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 6.568

6.  Linking Scores with Patient-Reported Health Outcome Instruments: A Validation Study and Comparison of Three Linking Methods.

Authors:  Benjamin D Schalet; Sangdon Lim; David Cella; Seung W Choi
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Patient-reported outcomes of pain and physical functioning in neurofibromatosis clinical trials.

Authors:  Pamela L Wolters; Staci Martin; Vanessa L Merker; James H Tonsgard; Sondra E Solomon; Andrea Baldwin; Amanda L Bergner; Karin Walsh; Heather L Thompson; Kathy L Gardner; Cynthia M Hingtgen; Elizabeth Schorry; William N Dudley; Barbara Franklin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Development of a parents' short form survey of their children's oral health.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Ron Hays; Marvin Marcus; Carl Maida; Jie Shen; Di Xiong; Steve Lee; Vladimir Spolsky; Ian Coulter; James Crall; Honghu Liu
Journal:  Int J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.455

9.  Psychometric Evaluation of the National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System in a Multiracial, Multiethnic Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Cohort.

Authors:  Patricia Katz; Jinoos Yazdany; Laura Trupin; Stephanie Rush; Charles G Helmick; Louise B Murphy; Cristina Lanata; Lindsey A Criswell; Maria Dall'Era
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Characteristics Associated With Physical Function Trajectories in Older Adults With Cancer During Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Melisa L Wong; Steven M Paul; Judy Mastick; Christine Ritchie; Michael A Steinman; Louise C Walter; Christine Miaskowski
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.