Matthias Rose1, Jakob B Bjorner2, Barbara Gandek3, Bonnie Bruce4, James F Fries4, John E Ware5. 1. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Medical School, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: rose@charite.de. 2. National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark; i3 QualityMetric Incorporated, Lincoln, RI, USA; Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. 3. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA. 4. Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA. 5. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA; John Ware Research Group, Worcester, MA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To document the development and psychometric evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) item bank and static instruments. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The items were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative methods. A total of 16,065 adults answered item subsets (n>2,200/item) on the Internet, with oversampling of the chronically ill. Classical test and item response theory methods were used to evaluate 149 PROMIS PF items plus 10 Short Form-36 and 20 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index items. A graded response model was used to estimate item parameters, which were normed to a mean of 50 (standard deviation [SD]=10) in a US general population sample. RESULTS: The final bank consists of 124 PROMIS items covering upper, central, and lower extremity functions and instrumental activities of daily living. In simulations, a 10-item computerized adaptive test (CAT) eliminated floor and decreased ceiling effects, achieving higher measurement precision than any comparable length static tool across four SDs of the measurement range. Improved psychometric properties were transferred to the CAT's superior ability to identify differences between age and disease groups. CONCLUSION: The item bank provides a common metric and can improve the measurement of PF by facilitating the standardization of patient-reported outcome measures and implementation of CATs for more efficient PF assessments over a larger range.
OBJECTIVE: To document the development and psychometric evaluation of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) item bank and static instruments. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: The items were evaluated using qualitative and quantitative methods. A total of 16,065 adults answered item subsets (n>2,200/item) on the Internet, with oversampling of the chronically ill. Classical test and item response theory methods were used to evaluate 149 PROMIS PF items plus 10 Short Form-36 and 20 Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index items. A graded response model was used to estimate item parameters, which were normed to a mean of 50 (standard deviation [SD]=10) in a US general population sample. RESULTS: The final bank consists of 124 PROMIS items covering upper, central, and lower extremity functions and instrumental activities of daily living. In simulations, a 10-item computerized adaptive test (CAT) eliminated floor and decreased ceiling effects, achieving higher measurement precision than any comparable length static tool across four SDs of the measurement range. Improved psychometric properties were transferred to the CAT's superior ability to identify differences between age and disease groups. CONCLUSION: The item bank provides a common metric and can improve the measurement of PF by facilitating the standardization of patient-reported outcome measures and implementation of CATs for more efficient PF assessments over a larger range.
Authors: Stephen M Haley; Wendy J Coster; Patricia L Andres; Larry H Ludlow; Pengsheg Ni; Tamara L Y Bond; Samuel J Sinclair; Alan M Jette Journal: Med Care Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: A E Raczek; J E Ware; J B Bjorner; B Gandek; S M Haley; N K Aaronson; G Apolone; P Bech; J E Brazier; M Bullinger; M Sullivan Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: William D Tap; Hans Gelderblom; Emanuela Palmerini; Jayesh Desai; Sebastian Bauer; Jean-Yves Blay; Thierry Alcindor; Kristen Ganjoo; Javier Martín-Broto; Christopher W Ryan; David M Thomas; Charles Peterfy; John H Healey; Michiel van de Sande; Heather L Gelhorn; Dale E Shuster; Qiang Wang; Antoine Yver; Henry H Hsu; Paul S Lin; Sandra Tong-Starksen; Silvia Stacchiotti; Andrew J Wagner Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-06-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kim M Keppler-Noreuil; Julie C Sapp; Marjorie J Lindhurst; Thomas N Darling; Jasmine Burton-Akright; Mohammadhadi Bagheri; Eva Dombi; Ashlyn Gruber; Paul F Jarosinski; Staci Martin; Neera Nathan; Scott M Paul; Ronald E Savage; Pamela L Wolters; Brian Schwartz; Brigitte C Widemann; Leslie G Biesecker Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2019-02-22 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: Clifton O Bingham; Susan J Bartlett; Peter A Merkel; Thelma J Mielenz; Paul A Pilkonis; Lauren Edmundson; Emily Moore; Rajeev K Sabharwal Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2016-02-25 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Pamela L Wolters; Staci Martin; Vanessa L Merker; James H Tonsgard; Sondra E Solomon; Andrea Baldwin; Amanda L Bergner; Karin Walsh; Heather L Thompson; Kathy L Gardner; Cynthia M Hingtgen; Elizabeth Schorry; William N Dudley; Barbara Franklin Journal: Neurology Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Yan Wang; Ron Hays; Marvin Marcus; Carl Maida; Jie Shen; Di Xiong; Steve Lee; Vladimir Spolsky; Ian Coulter; James Crall; Honghu Liu Journal: Int J Paediatr Dent Date: 2019-01-24 Impact factor: 3.455
Authors: Patricia Katz; Jinoos Yazdany; Laura Trupin; Stephanie Rush; Charles G Helmick; Louise B Murphy; Cristina Lanata; Lindsey A Criswell; Maria Dall'Era Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Melisa L Wong; Steven M Paul; Judy Mastick; Christine Ritchie; Michael A Steinman; Louise C Walter; Christine Miaskowski Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 3.612