Soren E Skovlund1,2, T H Lichtenberg3, D Hessler4, N Ejskjaer5,6. 1. Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. s.skovlund@rn.dk. 2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Søndre Skovvej 15, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark. s.skovlund@rn.dk. 3. Danish Health Data Authority, Copenhagen, Denmark. 4. Family & Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 5. Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. 6. Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Søndre Skovvej 15, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, the recommendation for and use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine diabetes care has significantly increased. We review recent evidence and highlight key opportunities and challenges related to the active clinical use of PROMs to support person-centered diabetes care and focus areas for future research in the area. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent pragmatic studies support that integration of multi-dimensional PROMs for diabetes in clinical care as part of a care improvement strategy can be acceptable for and valued by people with diabetes (PWD) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) and may improve multiple aspects of quality of care, including screening, medical care monitoring and decision support, individualization of self-management support and goal-setting, and broader benefits related to active patient participation and person-centred diabetes care. We identify multiple intervention, individual, and care setting characteristics, which influence acceptability, feasibility, implementation, and effectiveness of PROMs in routine care. Recent clinical PROM studies highlight the value of mixed methods research and systematic involvement of PWD, clinicians, and other stakeholders in the design and implementation of questionnaires for patient input in routine diabetes care. We identified a new significant trend towards participatory development of multi-dimensional PROMs with the aim of IT-enabled integration into routine diabetes care to facilitate multiple components of person-centered diabetes care and better clinical, quality of life, and cost outcomes. While results from large-scale randomized controlled studies are still limited, a growing number of pragmatic implementation studies support that user-centric PROM interventions have the potential to facilitate significant improvements in care for PWD.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In recent years, the recommendation for and use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in routine diabetes care has significantly increased. We review recent evidence and highlight key opportunities and challenges related to the active clinical use of PROMs to support person-centered diabetes care and focus areas for future research in the area. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent pragmatic studies support that integration of multi-dimensional PROMs for diabetes in clinical care as part of a care improvement strategy can be acceptable for and valued by people with diabetes (PWD) and healthcare professionals (HCPs) and may improve multiple aspects of quality of care, including screening, medical care monitoring and decision support, individualization of self-management support and goal-setting, and broader benefits related to active patient participation and person-centred diabetes care. We identify multiple intervention, individual, and care setting characteristics, which influence acceptability, feasibility, implementation, and effectiveness of PROMs in routine care. Recent clinical PROM studies highlight the value of mixed methods research and systematic involvement of PWD, clinicians, and other stakeholders in the design and implementation of questionnaires for patient input in routine diabetes care. We identified a new significant trend towards participatory development of multi-dimensional PROMs with the aim of IT-enabled integration into routine diabetes care to facilitate multiple components of person-centered diabetes care and better clinical, quality of life, and cost outcomes. While results from large-scale randomized controlled studies are still limited, a growing number of pragmatic implementation studies support that user-centric PROM interventions have the potential to facilitate significant improvements in care for PWD.
Authors: J M Valderas; A Kotzeva; M Espallargues; G Guyatt; C E Ferrans; M Y Halyard; D A Revicki; T Symonds; A Parada; J Alonso Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2008-01-04 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Marlene H Frost; Amy E Bonomi; Joseph C Cappelleri; Holger J Schünemann; Timothy J Moynihan; Neil K Aaronson Journal: Mayo Clin Proc Date: 2007-10 Impact factor: 7.616
Authors: Alberto J Pérez-Panero; María Ruiz-Muñoz; Raúl Fernández-Torres; Cynthia Formosa; Alfred Gatt; Manuel Gónzalez-Sánchez Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Sanne H M Kremers; Sarah H Wild; Petra J M Elders; Joline W J Beulens; David J T Campbell; Frans Pouwer; Nanna Lindekilde; Maartje de Wit; Cathy Lloyd; Femke Rutters Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 10.460
Authors: Scott J Pilla; Jenny Park; Jessica L Schwartz; Michael C Albert; Patti L Ephraim; L Ebony Boulware; Nestoras N Mathioudakis; Nisa M Maruthur; Mary Catherine Beach; Raquel C Greer Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Anni Vuohijoki; Ilona Mikkola; Jari Jokelainen; Sirkka Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi; Klas Winell; Lucia Frittitta; Markku Timonen; Maria Hagnäs Journal: J Prim Care Community Health Date: 2020 Jan-Dec