Vanessa B Hurley1, Yue Wang2, Hector P Rodriguez3, Stephen M Shortell3, Stephen Kearing4, Lucy A Savitz5. 1. Health Systems Administration, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA. 2. Tile, San Mateo, CA 94403, USA. 3. Health Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA. 4. High Value Healthcare Collaborative, Hanover, NH 03755, USA. 5. Center for Health Research (Northwest and Hawaii), Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, OR 97227, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) research has emphasized the role of decision aids (DAs) for helping patients make treatment decisions reflective of their preferences, yet there have been few collaborative multi-institutional efforts to integrate DAs in orthopedic consultations and primary care encounters. OBJECTIVE: In the context of routine DA implementation for SDM, we investigate which patient-level characteristics are associated with patient preferences for surgery versus medical management before and after exposure to DAs. We explored whether DA implementation in primary care encounters was associated with greater shifts in patients' treatment preferences after exposure to DAs compared to DA implementation in orthopedic consultations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 10 High Value Healthcare Collaborative (HVHC) health systems. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A total of 495 hip and 1343 adult knee osteoarthritis patients who were exposed to DAs within HVHC systems between July 2012 to June 2015. RESULTS: Nearly 20% of knee patients and 17% of hip patients remained uncertain about their treatment preferences after viewing DAs. Older patients and patients with high pain levels had an increased preference for surgery. Older patients receiving DAs from three HVHC systems that transitioned DA implementation from orthopedics into primary care had lower odds of preferring surgery after DA exposure compared to older patients in seven HVHC systems that only implemented DAs for orthopedic consultations. CONCLUSION: Patients' treatment preferences were largely stable over time, highlighting that DAs for SDM largely do not necessarily shift preferences. DAs and SDM processes should be targeted at older adults and patients reporting high pain levels. Initiating treatment conversations in primary versus specialty care settings may also have important implications for engagement of patients in SDM via DAs.
BACKGROUND: Shared decision making (SDM) research has emphasized the role of decision aids (DAs) for helping patients make treatment decisions reflective of their preferences, yet there have been few collaborative multi-institutional efforts to integrate DAs in orthopedic consultations and primary care encounters. OBJECTIVE: In the context of routine DA implementation for SDM, we investigate which patient-level characteristics are associated with patient preferences for surgery versus medical management before and after exposure to DAs. We explored whether DA implementation in primary care encounters was associated with greater shifts in patients' treatment preferences after exposure to DAs compared to DA implementation in orthopedic consultations. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: 10 High Value Healthcare Collaborative (HVHC) health systems. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: A total of 495 hip and 1343 adult knee osteoarthritis patients who were exposed to DAs within HVHC systems between July 2012 to June 2015. RESULTS: Nearly 20% of knee patients and 17% of hip patients remained uncertain about their treatment preferences after viewing DAs. Older patients and patients with high pain levels had an increased preference for surgery. Older patients receiving DAs from three HVHC systems that transitioned DA implementation from orthopedics into primary care had lower odds of preferring surgery after DA exposure compared to older patients in seven HVHC systems that only implemented DAs for orthopedic consultations. CONCLUSION: Patients' treatment preferences were largely stable over time, highlighting that DAs for SDM largely do not necessarily shift preferences. DAs and SDM processes should be targeted at older adults and patients reporting high pain levels. Initiating treatment conversations in primary versus specialty care settings may also have important implications for engagement of patients in SDM via DAs.
Authors: Dawn Stacey; Carol L Bennett; Michael J Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; France Légaré; Richard Thomson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2011-10-05
Authors: George W Saba; Sabrina T Wong; Dean Schillinger; Alicia Fernandez; Carol P Somkin; Clifford C Wilson; Kevin Grumbach Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2006 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: David Arterburn; Robert Wellman; Emily Westbrook; Carolyn Rutter; Tyler Ross; David McCulloch; Matthew Handley; Charles Jung Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Michael R Gionfriddo; Aaron L Leppin; Juan P Brito; Annie Leblanc; Kasey R Boehmer; Megan A Morris; Patricia J Erwin; Larry J Prokop; Claudia L Zeballos-Palacios; German Malaga; J Jaime Miranda; Heidi M McLeod; René Rodríguez-Gutiérrez; Rongchong Huang; Oscar L Morey-Vargas; Mohammad Hassan Murad; Victor M Montori Journal: Syst Rev Date: 2014-04-15
Authors: Linda Baumbach; Donna Ankerst; Ewa M Roos; Lillemor A Nyberg; Elizabeth Cottrell; Jesper Lykkegaard Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2021-07-05 Impact factor: 2.581