Literature DB >> 32918167

Using aversive conditioning with near-real-time feedback to shape eye movements during naturalistic viewing.

Brian A Anderson1.   

Abstract

Strategically shaping patterns of eye movements through training has manifold promising applications, with the potential to improve the speed and efficiency of visual search, improve the ability of humans to extract information from complex displays, and help correct disordered eye movement patterns. However, training how a person moves their eyes when viewing an image or scene is notoriously difficult, with typical approaches relying on explicit instruction and strategy, which have notable limitations. The present study introduces a novel approach to eye movement training using aversive conditioning with near-real-time feedback. Participants viewed indoor scenes (eight scenes presented over 48 trials) with the goal of remembering those scenes for a later memory test. During viewing, saccades meeting specific amplitude and direction criteria probabilistically triggered an aversive electric shock, which was felt within 50 ms after the eliciting eye movement, allowing for a close temporal coupling between an oculomotor behavior and the feedback intended to shape it. Results demonstrate a bias against performing an initial saccade in the direction paired with shock (Experiment 1) or generally of the amplitude paired with shock (Experiment 2), an effect that operates without apparent awareness of the relationship between shocks and saccades, persists into extinction, and generalizes to the viewing of novel images. The present study serves as a proof of concept concerning the implementation of near-real-time feedback in eye movement training.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aversive conditioning; Saccades; Training

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32918167      PMCID: PMC7947016          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-020-01476-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  61 in total

1.  Contiguity and reinforcement in relation to CS-UCS intervals in classical aversive conditioning.

Authors:  J E JONES
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-05       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Teaching search patterns to medical trainees in an educational laboratory to improve perception of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  William F Auffermann; Brent P Little; Srini Tridandapani
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-06

3.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Neural Correlates of Fixation Duration during Real-world Scene Viewing: Evidence from Fixation-related (FIRE) fMRI.

Authors:  John M Henderson; Wonil Choi
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Visual resolution and contour interaction in the fovea and periphery.

Authors:  R J Jacobs
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Comparing search patterns in digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography: an eye tracking study.

Authors:  Avi Aizenman; Trafton Drew; Krista A Ehinger; Dianne Georgian-Smith; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2017-10-27

7.  Mechanisms of value-learning in the guidance of spatial attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-05-11

8.  People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat.

Authors:  Tom Nissens; Michel Failing; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2016-10-31

9.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

10.  Human gaze control during real-world scene perception.

Authors:  John M Henderson
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pavlovian learning in the selection history-dependent control of overt spatial attention.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Ming-Ray Liao; Laurent Grégoire
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.077

2.  This is a test: Oculomotor capture when the experiment keeps score.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Lana Mrkonja
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 2.157

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.