Literature DB >> 15645229

Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography.

Khaled Z Sheir1, Osama Mansour, Khaled Madbouly, Emad Elsobky, Mohamed Abdel-Khalek.   

Abstract

Various techniques for noncontrast spiral computerized tomography (NCCT) were utilized for the determination of the Hounsefield unit (HU) values of various types of urinary calculi with the aim of determining the best technique for distinguishing various stones compositions. A total of 130 urinary stones, obtained from patients who underwent open surgery, were scanned with a multidetector row scanner using 1.25 mm collimation at two energy levels of 100 and 120 kV at 240 mA. Two post-scanning protocols were used for the HU value assignment, tissue and bone windows, for both kV values. In both protocols, three transverse planes were defined in each stone, one near the top, one in the middle, and one near the bottom. Three regions of interest (ROI) were obtained in each plane. The absolute HU value was determined by three methods: the mean of the nine ROI, the mean of the central three ROI, and the central ROI in the middle plane. Determination of the stones' composition was performed using the absolute HU value measured at 120 kV, the dual CT values (HU values at 100 kV-HU values at 120 kV), and HU values/stone volume ratio (HU density). All stones were analyzed by x-ray diffraction to determine their chemical composition. After the exclusion of groups with few calculi, 47 pure stones [25 uric acid (UA), 15 calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), seven struvite], and 60 mixed stones [15 COM 60-90%+hydroxyl apatite (HA), 14 COM 40-90%+UA, 21 UA+COM <40%, ten mixed struvite+COM+hydroxyl apatite] were included in the statistical analysis. From the least to the most dense, the pure stone types were UA, struvite, COM. Mixed UA+COM<40% calculi were less dense but insignificantly different from pure UA, while when the COM ratio was > or =40% their density became higher than and significantly different from pure UA, and less than but not significantly differentiated from pure COM. Mixed COM+HA were the most dense stones. Using the absolute HU values at 120 kV and HU density, we could distinguish, with statistical significance, all pure types from each other, pure UA from all mixed calculi except UA+COM <40%, pure COM from mixed UA+COM <40%, and pure struvite from all mixed stones except mixed struvite stones. Dual CT values were not as good as absolute HU values and HU density in the determination of stone composition. These results demonstrate that absolute HU values and HU density derived from CT scanning using a small collimation size could uncover statistically significant differences among all pure and most of the mixed urinary stones. This permits more accuracy in the prediction of stone composition. Moreover, this technique permits diagnostic conclusions on the basis of single CT evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15645229     DOI: 10.1007/s00240-004-0454-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Res        ISSN: 0300-5623


  11 in total

1.  Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting.

Authors:  S Y Nakada; D G Hoff; S Attai; D Heisey; D Blankenbaker; M Pozniak
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition.

Authors:  G Motley; N Dalrymple; C Keesling; J Fischer; W Harmon
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Computed tomographic analysis of renal calculi.

Authors:  B J Hillman; G W Drach; P Tracey; J A Gaines
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Computed tomographic analysis of urinary calculi.

Authors:  J H Newhouse; E L Prien; E S Amis; S P Dretler; R C Pfister
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Computed tomography of urinary calculi.

Authors:  M P Federle; J W McAninch; J A Kaiser; P C Goodman; J Roberts; J C Mall
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography.

Authors:  M R Mostafavi; R D Ernst; B Saltzman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain.

Authors:  N C Dalrymple; M Verga; K R Anderson; P Bove; A M Covey; A T Rosenfield; R C Smith
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation.

Authors:  K C Saw; J A McAteer; A G Monga; G T Chua; J E Lingeman; J C Williams
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Prediction of stone composition from plain radiographs: a prospective study.

Authors:  S Ramakumar; D E Patterson; A J LeRoy; C E Bender; S B Erickson; D M Wilson; J W Segura
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.942

10.  Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT.

Authors:  R C Smith; M Verga; S McCarthy; A T Rosenfield
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective.

Authors:  Hans-Göran Tiselius; Christian G Chaussy
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2012-06-27

Review 2.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  Predictive value of low tube voltage and dual-energy CT for successful shock wave lithotripsy: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Remo Largo; Paul Stolzmann; Christian D Fankhauser; Cédric Poyet; Pirmin Wolfsgruber; Tullio Sulser; Hatem Alkadhi; Sebastian Winklhofer
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Viewing windows do not alter Hounsfield units in CT scans.

Authors:  James C Williams
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2005-11-22

Review 5.  [Diagnostic imaging--the end of intravenous urography?].

Authors:  W L Strohmaier; R Bartunek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  In Vivo Evaluation of Chemical Composition of Eight Types of Urinary Calculi Using Spiral Computerized Tomography in a Chinese Population.

Authors:  Jun Huo; Zhong-Yuan Liu; Ke-Feng Wang; Zhen-Qun Xu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Determining the composition of urinary tract calculi using stone-targeted dual-energy CT: evaluation of a low-dose scanning protocol in a clinical environment.

Authors:  Richard J Chaytor; Krishnamoorthy Rajbabu; Paul A Jones; Liam McKnight
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Using Helical CT to Predict Stone Fragility in Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL).

Authors:  James C Williams; Chad A Zarse; Molly E Jackson; James E Lingeman; James A McAteer
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2007-04-05

9.  Uric acid nephrolithias in the era of noncontrast computed tomography.

Authors:  Blayne K Welk; Joel M H Teichman
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Renal stone composition does not affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children.

Authors:  Onur Kaygısız; Fethi Ahmet Türegün; Nihat Satar; Ender Özen; Serdar Toksöz; Hasan Serkan Doğan; Mehmet Mesut Pişkin; Volkan İzol; Şaban Sarıkaya; Hakan Kılıçarslan; Tufan Çiçek; Ahmet Öztürk; Serdar Tekgül; Bülent Önal
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.