Literature DB >> 33733297

Histogram of kidney stones on non-contrast computed tomography to predict successful stone dusting during retrograde intrarenal surgery.

Dong Soo Kim1, Sung Kyoung Moon2, Sang Hyub Lee3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To predict successful dusting of kidney stones during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) using stone density parameters and histograms measured with non-contrast computed tomography imaging.
METHODS: Medical records of 49 patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery between January 2018 and January 2019 at Kyung Hee University Hospital were reviewed, and the data of 55 stones were evaluated. Patient age, sex, mean stone density, the highest and lowest measured Hounsfield unit (HU), standard deviation and range of the measured HUs, volume of the most measured HU, and success of dusting were evaluated. Histograms of the measured HUs were created and cutoff values for successful dusting were analyzed.
RESULTS: Thirty-two stones were successfully dusted during surgery. Dusted stones had a wider range of HU and higher standard deviation. The volume of the most measured HU was smaller in the dusted stones. Successful dusting could be predicted when the volume of the most measured HU was < 8.9 mm3, with range ≥ 853, or when the volume of the most measured HU was < 8.9 mm3, with range < 853, and the mean stone density was < 355. The histograms of HUs of the dusted stones were wide and rugged, while those of dusting failed stones were narrow and peaked.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of stone HU histograms showed differences in distribution and proportion. This will help predict surgical outcomes and prepare for intraoperative complications.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Diagnostic imaging; Endoscopy; Kidney calculi; Laser lithotripsy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33733297     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03659-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  26 in total

1.  In vitro fragmentation efficiency of holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser lithotripsy--a comprehensive study encompassing different frequencies, pulse energies, total power levels and laser fibre diameters.

Authors:  Peter Kronenberg; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 2.  Dusting, fragmenting, popcorning or dustmenting?

Authors:  Mike Wenzel; Matthew Bultitude; Johannes Salem
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 3.  Worldwide Trends of Urinary Stone Disease Treatment Over the Last Two Decades: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Robert M Geraghty; Patrick Jones; Bhaskar K Somani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.942

4.  Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.

Authors:  Dean Assimos; Amy Krambeck; Nicole L Miller; Manoj Monga; M Hassan Murad; Caleb P Nelson; Kenneth T Pace; Vernon M Pais; Margaret S Pearle; Glenn M Preminger; Hassan Razvi; Ojas Shah; Brian R Matlaga
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Ureteroscopic Laser Lithotripsy: A Review of Dusting vs Fragmentation with Extraction.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Ben Chew; Brian Eisner; Mitchell Humphreys; Bodo Knudsen; Amy Krambeck; Dirk Lange; Michael Lipkin; Nicole L Miller; Manoj Monga; Vernon Pais; Roger L Sur; Ojas Shah
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Can stone density on plain radiography predict the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for ureteral stones?

Authors:  Ki Hong Lim; Jin-Hee Jung; Jae Hyun Kwon; Yong Seok Lee; Jungbum Bae; Min Chul Cho; Kwang Soo Lee; Hae Won Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-06

7.  Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis.

Authors:  Tolga Akman; Murat Binbay; Faruk Ozgor; Mesut Ugurlu; Erdem Tekinarslan; Cem Kezer; Rahmi Aslan; Ahmet Yaser Muslumanoglu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Contemporary Practice Patterns of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Treating Renal Stones: Results of a Worldwide Survey.

Authors:  Casey A Dauw; Laika Simeon; Abdulrahman F Alruwaily; Francesco Sanguedolce; John M Hollingsworth; William W Roberts; Gary J Faerber; J Stuart Wolf; Khurshid R Ghani
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.942

9.  Retrograde ureteroscopic intrarenal surgery for large (1.6-3.5 cm) upper ureteric/renal calculus.

Authors:  M Prabhakar
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2010 Jan-Mar

Review 10.  EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis.

Authors:  Christian Türk; Aleš Petřík; Kemal Sarica; Christian Seitz; Andreas Skolarikos; Michael Straub; Thomas Knoll
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.