Literature DB >> 34866707

A New Method to Balance Measurement Accuracy and Attribute Coverage in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Xiaojian Sun1,2, Björn Andersson3, Tao Xin4.   

Abstract

As one of the important research areas of cognitive diagnosis assessment, cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing (CD-CAT) has received much attention in recent years. Measurement accuracy is the major theme in CD-CAT, and both the item selection method and the attribute coverage have a crucial effect on measurement accuracy. A new attribute coverage index, the ratio of test length to the number of attributes (RTA), is introduced in the current study. RTA is appropriate when the item pool comprises many items that measure multiple attributes where it can both produce acceptable measurement accuracy and balance the attribute coverage. With simulations, the new index is compared to the original item selection method (ORI) and the attribute balance index (ABI), which have been proposed in previous studies. The results show that (1) the RTA method produces comparable measurement accuracy to the ORI method under most item selection methods; (2) the RTA method produces higher measurement accuracy than the ABI method for most item selection methods, with the exception of the mutual information item selection method; (3) the RTA method prefers items that measure multiple attributes, compared to the ORI and ABI methods, while the ABI prefers items that measure a single attribute; and (4) the RTA method performs better than the ORI method with respect to attribute coverage, while it performs worse than the ABI with long tests.
© The Author(s) 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attribute coverage; cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing; measurement accuracy; the ratio of test length to the number of attributes

Year:  2021        PMID: 34866707      PMCID: PMC8640349          DOI: 10.1177/01466216211040489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas        ISSN: 0146-6216


  12 in total

1.  The maximum priority index method for severely constrained item selection in computerized adaptive testing.

Authors:  Ying Cheng; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2008-06-02       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Combining computer adaptive testing technology with cognitively diagnostic assessment.

Authors:  Meghan McGlohen; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2008-08

3.  Nonparametric Calibration of Item-by-Attribute Matrix in Cognitive Diagnosis.

Authors:  Youn Seon Lim; Fritz Drasgow
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  New Item Selection Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Mehmet Kaplan; Jimmy de la Torre; Juan Ramón Barrada
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-11-13

5.  Modified Cognitive Diagnostic Index and Modified Attribute-Level Discrimination Index for Test Construction.

Authors:  Bor-Chen Kuo; Hsiao-Shan Pai; Jimmy de la Torre
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-03-28

6.  High-Efficiency Response Distribution-Based Item Selection Algorithms for Short-Length Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.

Authors:  Chanjin Zheng; Hua-Hua Chang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2016-09-24

7.  The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.

Authors:  Matthew J Madison; Laine P Bradshaw
Journal:  Educ Psychol Meas       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 2.821

8.  On the Identifiability of Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Guanhua Fang; Jingchen Liu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.

Authors:  Gongjun Xu; Chun Wang; Zhuoran Shang
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.380

10.  The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.

Authors:  Yuqi Gu; Gongjun Xu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.