Literature DB >> 30456748

Estimating the Cognitive Diagnosis [Formula: see text] Matrix with Expert Knowledge: Application to the Fraction-Subtraction Dataset.

Steven Andrew Culpepper1.   

Abstract

Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are an important psychometric framework for classifying students in terms of attribute and/or skill mastery. The [Formula: see text] matrix, which specifies the required attributes for each item, is central to implementing CDMs. The general unavailability of [Formula: see text] for most content areas and datasets poses a barrier to widespread applications of CDMs, and recent research accordingly developed fully exploratory methods to estimate Q. However, current methods do not always offer clear interpretations of the uncovered skills and existing exploratory methods do not use expert knowledge to estimate Q. We consider Bayesian estimation of [Formula: see text] using a prior based upon expert knowledge using a fully Bayesian formulation for a general diagnostic model. The developed method can be used to validate which of the underlying attributes are predicted by experts and to identify residual attributes that remain unexplained by expert knowledge. We report Monte Carlo evidence about the accuracy of selecting active expert-predictors and present an application using Tatsuoka's fraction-subtraction dataset.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian; exploratory cognitive diagnosis models; general diagnostic model; multivariate regression; spike–slab priors; validation; variable selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30456748     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-018-9643-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  10 in total

1.  Revisiting the 4-Parameter Item Response Model: Bayesian Estimation and Application.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  On the Consistency of Q-Matrix Estimation: A Commentary.

Authors:  Jingchen Liu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  A general diagnostic model applied to language testing data.

Authors:  Matthias von Davier
Journal:  Br J Math Stat Psychol       Date:  2007-03-22       Impact factor: 3.380

4.  A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.

Authors:  Jimmy de la Torre; Chia-Yi Chiu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.500

5.  An Improved Strategy for Bayesian Estimation of the Reduced Reparameterized Unified Model.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper; Aaron Hudson
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-05-16

6.  Statistical Analysis of Q-matrix Based Diagnostic Classification Models.

Authors:  Yunxiao Chen; Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.

Authors:  Yinghan Chen; Steven Andrew Culpepper; Yuguo Chen; Jeffrey Douglas
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.500

8.  The Sufficient and Necessary Condition for the Identifiability and Estimability of the DINA Model.

Authors:  Yuqi Gu; Gongjun Xu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 2.500

9.  Theory of the Self-learning Q-Matrix.

Authors:  Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Bernoulli (Andover)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 1.595

10.  Data-Driven Learning of Q-Matrix.

Authors:  Jingchen Liu; Gongjun Xu; Zhiliang Ying
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2012-10
  10 in total
  6 in total

1.  An Exploratory Diagnostic Model for Ordinal Responses with Binary Attributes: Identifiability and Estimation.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.500

2.  Variational Bayes Inference Algorithm for the Saturated Diagnostic Classification Model.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Yamaguchi; Kensuke Okada
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  A Sparse Latent Class Model for Cognitive Diagnosis.

Authors:  Yinyin Chen; Steven Culpepper; Feng Liang
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  A multiple logistic regression-based (MLR-B) Q-matrix validation method for cognitive diagnosis models:A confirmatory approach.

Authors:  Dongbo Tu; Jin Chiu; Wenchao Ma; Daxun Wang; Yan Cai; Xueyuan Ouyang
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-07-11

5.  A Note on Weaker Conditions for Identifying Restricted Latent Class Models for Binary Responses.

Authors:  Steven Andrew Culpepper
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 2.290

6.  Estimating Cognitive Diagnosis Models in Small Samples: Bayes Modal Estimation and Monotonic Constraints.

Authors:  Wenchao Ma; Zhehan Jiang
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2020-12-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.