Literature DB >> 29716916

Reducing overtreatment of prostate cancer by radical prostatectomy in Eastern Ontario: a population-based cohort study.

Luke Witherspoon1, Johnathan L Lau1, Rodney H Breau1, Christopher Knee1, Michael Fung Kee Fung1, Robin Morash1, Ranjeeta Mallick1, Ilias Cagiannos1, Christopher Morash1, Luke T Lavallée1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Canadian guidelines recommend against population-based screening for prostate cancer because of the risk of overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We sought to assess whether a higher proportion of patients receiving surgery had clinically significant cancer over time.
METHODS: All hospitals in Eastern Ontario that perform prostatectomy participate in a Prostate Cancer Community of Practice, which prospectively maintains a database for the region. Using these data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study that included all patients who underwent prostatectomy from 2009 to 2015 in the region. We examined trends in biopsy findings, clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen level and Gleason score. We then determined whether the proportion of patients with clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥ 7 or stage pT3) increased over time.
RESULTS: During the study period, 1897 patients underwent prostatectomy in Eastern Ontario (mean 271 surgeries/yr). The proportion of patients who were determined to have National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate or high-risk disease increased from 46.7% in 2009 to 90.2% in 2015. The proportion of men with clinically significant cancer on prostatectomy increased from 59.7% in 2009 to 93.1% in 2015. Adjusted analyses suggested that the proportion of patients with clinically significant cancer increased by 5% per year during the study period.
INTERPRETATION: There has been a change in the tumour characteristics of patients who undergo prostatectomy in Eastern Ontario. In recent years, almost all patients have had clinically significant cancer, which suggests that overtreatment of prostate cancer has decreased. Copyright 2018, Joule Inc. or its licensors.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29716916      PMCID: PMC7869662          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20170149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  17 in total

1.  Survival of men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy in Ontario.

Authors:  Luke T Lavallée; Douglas C Manuel; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test.

Authors:  Neil Bell; Sarah Connor Gorber; Amanda Shane; Michel Joffres; Harminder Singh; James Dickinson; Elizabeth Shaw; Lesley Dunfield; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Active surveillance compared with initial treatment for men with low-risk prostate cancer: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Julia H Hayes; Daniel A Ollendorf; Steven D Pearson; Michael J Barry; Philip W Kantoff; Susan T Stewart; Vibha Bhatnagar; Christopher J Sweeney; James E Stahl; Pamela M McMahon
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Changing Trends in Surgical Management of Prostate Cancer: The End of Overtreatment?

Authors:  Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 5.  The Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT).

Authors:  T J Wilt; M K Brawer
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 2.990

6.  10-Year Outcomes after Monitoring, Surgery, or Radiotherapy for Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Freddie C Hamdy; Jenny L Donovan; J Athene Lane; Malcolm Mason; Chris Metcalfe; Peter Holding; Michael Davis; Tim J Peters; Emma L Turner; Richard M Martin; Jon Oxley; Mary Robinson; John Staffurth; Eleanor Walsh; Prasad Bollina; James Catto; Andrew Doble; Alan Doherty; David Gillatt; Roger Kockelbergh; Howard Kynaston; Alan Paul; Philip Powell; Stephen Prescott; Derek J Rosario; Edward Rowe; David E Neal
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Active surveillance for prostate cancer: overview and update.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2013-03

8.  Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: Guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Chris Morash; Rovena Tey; Chika Agbassi; Laurence Klotz; Tom McGowan; John Srigley; Andrew Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Anxiety and health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer in an Australian centre.

Authors:  Chloe B Wilcox; Daniel Gilbourd; Mark Louie-Johnsun
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 10.  Quality improvement report: Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study. Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficult.

Authors:  Jenny Donovan; Nicola Mills; Monica Smith; Lucy Brindle; Ann Jacoby; Tim Peters; Stephen Frankel; David Neal; Freddie Hamdy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-10-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Use of video education in postoperative patient counselling: A quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Luke D E Witherspoon; Ailsa M L Gan; Rodney H Breau; Ginette Saumure; Jacqueline Shea; Ranjeeta Mallick; Jeffrey E Warren; Brian Blew; Ilias Cagiannos; Christopher Morash; Luke T Lavallée
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 1.862

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.