Literature DB >> 23318986

Active surveillance for prostate cancer: overview and update.

Laurence Klotz1.   

Abstract

Low-risk prostate cancer: How I would treat it? Overtreatment of many conditions diagnosed by screening has become increasingly recognized as a contemporary malady associated with modern medicine's efforts at earlier detection. The diagnosis of low-grade prostate cancer clearly qualifies as an example of potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer is an attempt to reduce the overtreatment of the disease. The approach involves initial expectant management rather than immediate therapy. Curative treatment is deferred while the patient is monitored and offered for evidence of risk reclassification to a more aggressive form of the disease. The basis for this approach is substantial evidence confirming the long natural history of most prostate cancers. The objective is to balance the risks of overtreatment and associated adverse quality of life effects, against the risk of progression of disease and a missed opportunity for curative therapy. Low-risk prostate cancer is more accurately viewed as one of several risk factors for the patient harboring higher-grade disease, rather than a life-threatening condition. This approach is similar to that taken historically for so-called precancerous conditions, such as PIN or ASAP, where patients were managed with close follow-up but without radical intervention unless clear evidence of more aggressive disease is identified. Active surveillance is increasingly viewed as the management of choice for patients with very low-risk (low-grade, low-volume prostate cancer) and low-risk (low-grade but higher volume) disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23318986     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-012-0221-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  45 in total

1.  Should we really consider Gleason 6 prostate cancer?

Authors:  J Curtis Nickel; Mark Speakman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Neil E Fleshner; M Scott Lucia; Blair Egerdie; Lorne Aaron; Gregg Eure; Indrani Nandy; Libby Black; Roger S Rittmaster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Comorbidity and mortality results from a randomized prostate cancer screening trial.

Authors:  E David Crawford; Robert Grubb; Amanda Black; Gerald L Andriole; Ming-Hui Chen; Grant Izmirlian; Christine D Berg; Anthony V D'Amico
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Effect of dutasteride on the risk of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Gerald L Andriole; David G Bostwick; Otis W Brawley; Leonard G Gomella; Michael Marberger; Francesco Montorsi; Curtis A Pettaway; Teuvo L Tammela; Claudio Teloken; Donald J Tindall; Matthew C Somerville; Timothy H Wilson; Ivy L Fowler; Roger S Rittmaster
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Early prostate cancer--treat or watch?

Authors:  Laurence Klotz; Ian Thompson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Feasibility study: watchful waiting for localized low to intermediate grade prostate carcinoma with selective delayed intervention based on prostate specific antigen, histological and/or clinical progression.

Authors:  Richard Choo; Laurence Klotz; Cyril Danjoux; Gerard C Morton; Gerrit DeBoer; Ewa Szumacher; Neil Fleshner; Peter Bunting; George Hruby
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Long-term quality-of-life outcomes after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting: the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-4 randomised trial.

Authors:  Eva Johansson; Gunnar Steineck; Lars Holmberg; Jan-Erik Johansson; Tommy Nyberg; Mirja Ruutu; Anna Bill-Axelson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 41.316

8.  Careful selection and close monitoring of low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance minimizes the need for treatment.

Authors:  Mark S Soloway; Cynthia T Soloway; Ahmed Eldefrawy; Kristell Acosta; Bruce Kava; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Expectant management with selective delayed intervention for favorable risk prostate cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  A multivariate analysis of clinical and pathological factors that predict for prostate specific antigen failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  A V D'Amico; R Whittington; S B Malkowicz; D Schultz; M Schnall; J E Tomaszewski; A Wein
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  20 in total

1.  Role for (11)C-choline PET in active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Oleksandr Boychak; Larissa Vos; William Makis; Francois-Alexandre Buteau; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew Parliament; Alexander J B McEwan; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Radiomics analysis of 18F-Choline PET/CT in the prediction of disease outcome in high-risk prostate cancer: an explorative study on machine learning feature classification in 94 patients.

Authors:  Pierpaolo Alongi; Alessandro Stefano; Albert Comelli; Riccardo Laudicella; Salvatore Scalisi; Giuseppe Arnone; Stefano Barone; Massimiliano Spada; Pierpaolo Purpura; Tommaso Vincenzo Bartolotta; Massimo Midiri; Roberto Lagalla; Giorgio Russo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Long-term differences in urinary, bowel and sexual function among men treated with surgery versus radiation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Justin D Ellett; James S Rosoff; Sandip M Prasad
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.285

4.  Active surveillance in Canadian men with low-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Octav Cristea; Luke T Lavallée; Joshua Montroy; Andrew Stokl; Sonya Cnossen; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson; Franco Momoli; Illias Cagiannos; Christopher Morash; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  The role of radiomics in prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Delgadillo; John C Ford; Matthew C Abramowitz; Alan Dal Pra; Alan Pollack; Radka Stoyanova
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Role of serial multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer active surveillance.

Authors:  Larissa J Vos; Michele Janoski; Keith Wachowicz; Atiyah Yahya; Oleksandr Boychak; John Amanie; Nadeem Pervez; Matthew B Parliament; Edith Pituskin; B Gino Fallone; Nawaid Usmani
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2016-04-28

Review 7.  Prostate Cancer Patient Perspectives on the Use of Information in Treatment Decision-Making: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-synthesis.

Authors:  Sujane Kandasamy; Ahmad Firas Khalid; Umair Majid; Meredith Vanstone
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-05-01

Review 8.  An arranged marriage for precision medicine: hypoxia and genomic assays in localized prostate cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  R G Bristow; A Berlin; A Dal Pra
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  The role of lifestyle characteristics on prostate cancer progression in two active surveillance cohorts.

Authors:  A D Vandersluis; D E Guy; L H Klotz; N E Fleshner; A Kiss; C Parker; V Venkateswaran
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.554

Review 10.  Prolaris Cell Cycle Progression Test for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.