Literature DB >> 26225165

Active surveillance for the management of localized prostate cancer: Guideline recommendations.

Chris Morash1, Rovena Tey2, Chika Agbassi2, Laurence Klotz3, Tom McGowan4, John Srigley5, Andrew Evans6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The objective is to provide guidance on the role of active surveillance (AS) as a management strategy for low-risk prostate cancer patients and to ensure that AS is offered to appropriate patients assessed by a standardized protocol. Prostate cancer is often a slowly progressive or sometimes non-progressive indolent disease diagnosed at an early stage with localized tumours that are unlikely to cause morbidity or death. Standard active treatments for prostate cancer include radiotherapy (RT) or radical prostatectomy (RP), but the harms from over diagnosis and overtreatment are of a significant concern. AS is increasingly being considered as a management strategy to avoid or delay the potential harms caused by unnecessary radical treatment.
METHODS: A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane library, guideline databases and relevant meeting proceedings was performed and a systematic review of identified evidence was synthesized to make recommendations relating to the role of AS in the management of localized prostate cancer.
RESULTS: No exiting guidelines or reviews were suitable for use in the synthesis of evidence for the recommendations, but 59 reports of primary studies were identified. Due to studies being either non-comparative or heterogeneous, pooled meta-analyses were not conducted.
CONCLUSION: The working group concluded that for patients with low-risk (Gleason score ≤6) localized prostate cancer, AS is the preferred disease management strategy. Active treatment (RP or RT) is appropriate for patients with intermediate-risk (Gleason score 7) localized prostate cancer. For select patients with low-volume Gleason 3+4=7 localized prostate cancer, AS can be considered.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 26225165      PMCID: PMC4479637          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.2806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  46 in total

1.  Pathological findings at radical prostatectomy in Japanese prospective active surveillance cohort.

Authors:  Mikio Sugimoto; Taizo Shiraishi; Hiroyuki Tsunemori; Takayoshi Demura; Yuko Saito; Toshiyuki Kamoto; Yoshiyuki Kakehi
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Dutasteride in localised prostate cancer management: the REDEEM randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Authors:  Neil E Fleshner; M Scott Lucia; Blair Egerdie; Lorne Aaron; Gregg Eure; Indrani Nandy; Libby Black; Roger S Rittmaster
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Complications following prostate needle biopsy requiring hospital admission or emergency department visits - experience from 1000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  G Igor Pinkhasov; Yu-Kuan Lin; Ricardo Palmerola; Paul Smith; Frank Mahon; Matthew G Kaag; J Edward Dagen; Lewis E Harpster; Carl T Reese; Jay D Raman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Nationwide prevalence of lymph node metastases in Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jen-Jane Liu; Daphne Y Lichtensztajn; Scarlett Lin Gomez; Weiva Sieh; Benjamin I Chung; Iona Cheng; James D Brooks
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 5.306

5.  Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Bruce J Trock; Patricia Landis; Zhaoyong Feng; Jonathan I Epstein; Alan W Partin; Patrick C Walsh; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Careful selection and close monitoring of low-risk prostate cancer patients on active surveillance minimizes the need for treatment.

Authors:  Mark S Soloway; Cynthia T Soloway; Ahmed Eldefrawy; Kristell Acosta; Bruce Kava; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting.

Authors:  Gunnar Steineck; Fred Helgesen; Jan Adolfsson; Paul W Dickman; Jan-Erik Johansson; Bo Johan Norlén; Lars Holmberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-12       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Frej Filén; Mirja Ruutu; Hans Garmo; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Stefan Bratell; Anders Spångberg; Juni Palmgren; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Outcomes following active surveillance of men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed in the prostate specific antigen era.

Authors:  Barbara Ercole; Sarah R Marietti; Judith Fine; Peter C Albertsen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Can prostate specific antigen derivatives and pathological parameters predict significant change in expectant management criteria for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Masood A Khan; H Ballentine Carter; Jonathan I Epstein; Michael C Miller; Patricia Landis; Patrick W Walsh; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  51 in total

1.  The utility of provincial AS guidelines.

Authors:  Munir Jamal
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  Codifying active surveillance.

Authors:  D Robert Siemens
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Trevor A Flood; Nicola Schieda; Daniel T Keefe; Rodney H Breau; Chris Morash; Kevin Hogan; Eric C Belanger; Kien T Mai; Susan J Robertson
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2016-07-10       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 5.  One is the new six: The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) patient-focused approach to Gleason grading.

Authors:  John R Srigley; Brett Delahunt; Lars Egevad; Hemamali Samaratunga; John Yaxley; Andrew J Evans
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Active surveillance in Canadian men with low-grade prostate cancer.

Authors:  Octav Cristea; Luke T Lavallée; Joshua Montroy; Andrew Stokl; Sonya Cnossen; Ranjeeta Mallick; Dean Fergusson; Franco Momoli; Illias Cagiannos; Christopher Morash; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Active Surveillance for Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Laurence Klotz
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging - Transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate: Clinically significant cancer detection rates stratified by the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 assessment category.

Authors:  Susan John; Steven Cooper; Rodney H Breau; Trevor A Flood; Ilias Cagiannos; Luke T Lavallee; Christopher Morash; Joseph O'sullivan; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

9.  Presence of invasive cribriform or intraductal growth at biopsy outperforms percentage grade 4 in predicting outcome of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte F Kweldam; Intan P Kümmerlin; Daan Nieboer; Ewout W Steyerberg; Chris H Bangma; Luca Incrocci; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Monique J Roobol; Geert J van Leenders
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  The effect of wide resection during radical prostatectomy on surgical margins.

Authors:  Luke T Lavallée; Andrew Stokl; Sonya Cnossen; Ranjeeta Mallick; Chris Morash; Ilias Cagiannos; Rodney H Breau
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.