INTRODUCTION: This quality improvement study examined if a video-based resource could reduce delayed discharges after robotic prostatectomy while maintaining high levels of patient satisfaction. METHODS: From April 2018 to February 2020, all patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) were asked to complete an anonymous survey evaluating their perioperative experience. The quality improvement (QI) intervention started in March 2019 with a series of six educational videos being shown to all patients. The videos were used to supplement postoperative instruction. The discharge times of all patients were obtained from The Ottawa Hospital Data Repositories. A run chart analysis was used to detect change in discharge time (outcome measure). Patient satisfaction (balancing measure) was analyzed using Chi-squared analysis and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 425 robotic prostatectomies (199 pre-intervention, 226 post-intervention) were available. Analysis of the run chart revealed non-random change favoring earlier discharge in the intervention group (p<0.05), with a pre-intervention late discharge rate of 64% and a post-intervention late discharge rate of 55%. A total of 140 surveys (59 pre-intervention, 81 post-intervention) assessing patient satisfaction were completed, corresponding with a response rate of 29.6% and 35.8%, respectively. Median score on a 10-point scale for overall satisfaction was equal between the intervention and non-intervention groups (9 [interquartile range (IQR 8-10) vs. 10 [IQR 8-10], p=0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction with care and education was high for all patients and was not negatively impacted by this intervention. Video education tools may be one method to help improve the discharge process following RARP.
INTRODUCTION: This quality improvement study examined if a video-based resource could reduce delayed discharges after robotic prostatectomy while maintaining high levels of patient satisfaction. METHODS: From April 2018 to February 2020, all patients undergoing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) were asked to complete an anonymous survey evaluating their perioperative experience. The quality improvement (QI) intervention started in March 2019 with a series of six educational videos being shown to all patients. The videos were used to supplement postoperative instruction. The discharge times of all patients were obtained from The Ottawa Hospital Data Repositories. A run chart analysis was used to detect change in discharge time (outcome measure). Patient satisfaction (balancing measure) was analyzed using Chi-squared analysis and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 425 robotic prostatectomies (199 pre-intervention, 226 post-intervention) were available. Analysis of the run chart revealed non-random change favoring earlier discharge in the intervention group (p<0.05), with a pre-intervention late discharge rate of 64% and a post-intervention late discharge rate of 55%. A total of 140 surveys (59 pre-intervention, 81 post-intervention) assessing patient satisfaction were completed, corresponding with a response rate of 29.6% and 35.8%, respectively. Median score on a 10-point scale for overall satisfaction was equal between the intervention and non-intervention groups (9 [interquartile range (IQR 8-10) vs. 10 [IQR 8-10], p=0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction with care and education was high for all patients and was not negatively impacted by this intervention. Video education tools may be one method to help improve the discharge process following RARP.
Authors: Melanie R Lovell; Tim Luckett; Frances M Boyle; Jane Phillips; Meera Agar; Patricia M Davidson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-05-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christian Bolenz; Amit Gupta; Timothy Hotze; Richard Ho; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Claus G Roehrborn; Yair Lotan Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-11-11 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Elyse M Love; Iviensan F Manalo; Suephy C Chen; Kuang-Ho Chen; Benjamin K Stoff Journal: J Am Acad Dermatol Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 11.527
Authors: Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey J Leow; Steven L Chang; Christian P Meyer; Ye Wang; Julian Hanske; Jesse D Sammon; Alexander P Cole; Mark A Preston; Prokar Dasgupta; Mani Menon; Benjamin I Chung; Quoc-Dien Trinh Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 20.096