Literature DB >> 2969941

Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule.

S L Greenspan1, H C Nusbaum, D B Pisoni.   

Abstract

To examine the effects of stimulus structure and variability on perceptual learning, we compared transcription accuracy before and after training with synthetic speech produced by rule. Subjects were trained with either isolated words or fluent sentences of synthetic speech that were either novel stimuli or a fixed list of stimuli that was repeated. Subjects who were trained on the same stimuli every day improved as much as did the subjects who were given novel stimuli. In a second experiment, the size of the repeated stimulus set was reduced. Under these conditions, subjects trained with repeated stimuli did not generalize to novel stimuli as well as did subjects trained with novel stimuli. Our results suggest that perceptual learning depends on the degree to which the training stimuli characterize the underlying structure of the full stimulus set. Furthermore, we found that training with isolated words only increased the intelligibility of isolated words, although training with sentences increased the intelligibility of both isolated words and sentences.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2969941      PMCID: PMC3495315          DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.14.3.421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  13 in total

1.  Articulation testing methods.

Authors:  J P EGAN
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Stimulus variation and repetition in the acquisition of naming responses.

Authors:  W F Dukes; W Bevan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-06

3.  Locus of segmental cues for word juncture.

Authors:  L H Nakatani; K D Dukes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Constraints on the perception of synthetic speech generated by rule.

Authors:  Howard C Nusbaum; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1985-03-01

5.  The TRACE model of speech perception.

Authors:  J L McClelland; J L Elman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Prosodic structure and spoken word recognition.

Authors:  F Grosjean; J P Gee
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1987-03

7.  On the genesis of abstract ideas.

Authors:  M I Posner; S W Keele
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-07

8.  The recognition of words after their acoustic offset: evidence and implications.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1985-10

9.  Speech perception: some new directions in research and theory.

Authors:  D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants.

Authors:  K N Stevens; S E Blumstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  36 in total

Review 1.  Comprehension of synthetic speech produced by rule: a review and theoretical interpretation.

Authors:  S A Duffy; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1992 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.500

2.  Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Stephen J Winters; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Temporal effects in priming of masked and degraded speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Charlotte Morse-Fortier; Amanda M Griffin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The role of training structure in perceptual learning of accented speech.

Authors:  Christina Y Tzeng; Jessica E D Alexander; Sabrina K Sidaras; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Distributed recognition of natural songs by European starlings.

Authors:  Daniel Knudsen; Jason V Thompson; Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2010-11-01

6.  Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech.

Authors:  Ann R Bradlow; Tessa Bent
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-05-29

7.  Perceptual learning of systematic variation in Spanish-accented speech.

Authors:  Sabrina K Sidaras; Jessica E D Alexander; Lynne C Nygaard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; Tessa Bent; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.