Literature DB >> 24511177

Constraints on the perception of synthetic speech generated by rule.

Howard C Nusbaum1, David B Pisoni1.   

Abstract

Within the next few years, there will be an extensive proliferation of various types of voice response devices in human-machine communication systems. Unfortunately, at present, relatively little basic or applied research has been carried out on the intelligibility, comprehension, and perceptual processing of synthetic speech produced by these devices. On the basis of our research, we identify five factors that must be considered in studying the perception of synthetic speech: (1) the specific demands imposed by a particular task, (2) the inherent limitations of the human information processing system, (3) the experience and training of the human listener, (4) the linguistic structure of the message set, and (5) the structure and quality of the speech signal.

Entities:  

Year:  1985        PMID: 24511177      PMCID: PMC3917555          DOI: 10.3758/bf03214389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput        ISSN: 0743-3808


  7 in total

1.  ARTICULATION-TESTING METHODS: CONSONANTAL DIFFERENTIATION WITH A CLOSED-RESPONSE SET.

Authors:  A S HOUSE; C E WILLIAMS; M H HEKER; K D KRYTER
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Articulation testing methods.

Authors:  J P EGAN
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1948-09       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Interaction of Knowledge Sources in Spoken Word Identification.

Authors:  Aita Salasoo; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  Some effects of training on the perception of synthetic speech.

Authors:  E C Schwab; H C Nusbaum; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 2.888

5.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features.

Authors:  M D Wang; R C Bilger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10

7.  Capacity demands in short-term memory for synthetic and natural speech.

Authors:  P A Luce; T C Feustel; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 2.888

  7 in total
  9 in total

1.  Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule.

Authors:  J S Logan; B G Greene; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Categorical perception of speech by children with specific language impairments.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Keith R Kluender; Julia L Evans
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Perception of synthetic speech produced automatically by rule: Intelligibility of eight text-to-speech systems.

Authors:  Beth G Greene; John S Logan; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1986-03

4.  Comprehension of natural and synthetic speech: effects of predictability on the verification of sentences controlled for intelligibility.

Authors:  David B Pisoni; Laura M Manous; Michael J Dedina
Journal:  Comput Speech Lang       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 1.899

5.  Perceptual learning of synthetic speech produced by rule.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; H C Nusbaum; D B Pisoni
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Children with specific language impairments perceive speech most categorically when tokens are natural and meaningful.

Authors:  Jeffry A Coady; Julia L Evans; Elina Mainela-Arnold; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Going Beyond Rote Auditory Learning: Neural Patterns of Generalized Auditory Learning.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Stephen C Van Hedger; John Veillette; Katherine Reis; Joel S Snyder; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Speech perception as an active cognitive process.

Authors:  Shannon L M Heald; Howard C Nusbaum
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-17

9.  Autonomic Nervous System Responses During Perception of Masked Speech may Reflect Constructs other than Subjective Listening Effort.

Authors:  Alexander L Francis; Megan K MacPherson; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Ann M Alvar
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.