Literature DB >> 29692920

Brain tumor biobanking in the precision medicine era: building a high-quality resource for translational research in neuro-oncology.

Quinn T Ostrom1, Karen Devine1, Jordonna Fulop1, Yingli Wolinsky1, Peter Liao1, Lindsay Stetson1, Marta Couce1, Andrew E Sloan1, Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan1.   

Abstract

The growth of precision medicine has made access to biobanks with high-quality, well-annotated neuro-oncology biospecimens critical. Developing and maintaining neuro-oncology biobanks is best accomplished through multidisciplinary collaboration between clinicians and researchers. Balancing the needs and leveraging the skills of all stakeholders in this multidisciplinary effort is of utmost importance. Collaboration with a multidisciplinary team of clinicians, health care team members, and institutions, as well as patients and their families, is essential for access to participants in order to obtain informed consent, collect samples under strict standard operating procedures, and accurate and relevant clinical annotation. Once a neuro-oncology biobank is established, development and implementation of policies related to governance and distribution of biospecimens (both within and outside the institution) is of critical importance for sustainability. Proper implementation of a governance process helps to ensure that the biospecimens and data can be utilized in research with the largest potential benefit. New NIH and peer-reviewed journal policies related to public sharing of 'omic' data generated from stored biospecimens create new ethical challenges that must be addressed in developing informed consents, protocols, and standard operating procedures. In addition, diversification of sources of funding for the biobanks is needed for long-term sustainability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biobanking; biospecimens; brain tumors

Year:  2016        PMID: 29692920      PMCID: PMC5909804          DOI: 10.1093/nop/npw029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurooncol Pract        ISSN: 2054-2577


  44 in total

1.  Informed consent and biobanks.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Epidemiology of brain metastases.

Authors:  Lakshmi Nayak; Eudocia Quant Lee; Patrick Y Wen
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

3.  The UK Biobank sample handling and storage validation studies.

Authors:  Tim C Peakman; Paul Elliott
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Leveraging biospecimen resources for discovery or validation of markers for early cancer detection.

Authors:  Sheri D Schully; Danielle M Carrick; Leah E Mechanic; Sudhir Srivastava; Garnet L Anderson; John A Baron; Christine D Berg; Jennifer Cullen; Eleftherios P Diamandis; V Paul Doria-Rose; Katrina A B Goddard; Susan E Hankinson; Lawrence H Kushi; Eric B Larson; Lisa M McShane; Richard L Schilsky; Steven Shak; Steven J Skates; Nicole Urban; Barnett S Kramer; Muin J Khoury; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Nucleic acid quantity and quality from paraffin blocks: defining optimal fixation, processing and DNA/RNA extraction techniques.

Authors:  Gulisa Turashvili; Winnie Yang; Steven McKinney; Steve Kalloger; Nadia Gale; Ying Ng; Katie Chow; Lynda Bell; Julie Lorette; Melinda Carrier; Margaret Luk; Samuel Aparicio; David Huntsman; Stephen Yip
Journal:  Exp Mol Pathol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 3.362

6.  Broad versus blanket consent for research with human biological samples.

Authors:  David Wendler
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.683

7.  Biobanking Research and Human Subjects Protections: Perspectives of IRB Leaders.

Authors:  Erin Rothwell; Karen J Maschke; Jeffrey R Botkin; Aaron Goldenberg; Thomas H Murray; Suzanne M Rivera
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr

8.  Broad Consent for Research With Biological Samples: Workshop Conclusions.

Authors:  Christine Grady; Lisa Eckstein; Ben Berkman; Dan Brock; Robert Cook-Deegan; Stephanie M Fullerton; Hank Greely; Mats G Hansson; Sara Hull; Scott Kim; Bernie Lo; Rebecca Pentz; Laura Rodriguez; Carol Weil; Benjamin S Wilfond; David Wendler
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 9.  The use of biospecimens in population-based research: a review of the National Cancer Institute's Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences grant portfolio.

Authors:  Danielle M Carrick; Eliza Mette; Brittany Hoyle; Scott D Rogers; Elizabeth M Gillanders; Sheri D Schully; Leah E Mechanic
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.300

10.  Biobanks and electronic medical records: enabling cost-effective research.

Authors:  Erica Bowton; Julie R Field; Sunny Wang; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Sara L Van Driest; Jessica T Delaney; James Cowan; Peter Weeke; Jonathan D Mosley; Quinn S Wells; Jason H Karnes; Christian Shaffer; Josh F Peterson; Joshua C Denny; Dan M Roden; Jill M Pulley
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 17.956

View more
  2 in total

1.  Brain Tumor Biobank Development for Precision Medicine: Role of the Neurosurgeon.

Authors:  Emilie Darrigues; Benjamin W Elberson; Annick De Loose; Madison P Lee; Ebonye Green; Ashley M Benton; Ladye G Sink; Hayden Scott; Murat Gokden; John D Day; Analiz Rodriguez
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Mind Over Matter: Confronting Challenges in Post-Mortem Brain Biobanking for Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Cassandra Griffin; Ricardo Vilain; Simon King; Sandy Nixon; Alisha Gooley; Samara Bray; James Lynam; Marjorie M Walker; Rodney J Scott; Christine Paul
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2021-04-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.