Literature DB >> 25162460

The use of biospecimens in population-based research: a review of the National Cancer Institute's Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences grant portfolio.

Danielle M Carrick1, Eliza Mette, Brittany Hoyle, Scott D Rogers, Elizabeth M Gillanders, Sheri D Schully, Leah E Mechanic.   

Abstract

Over the past two decades, researchers have increasingly used human biospecimens to evaluate hypotheses related to disease risk, outcomes and treatment. We conducted an analysis of population-science cancer research grants funded by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) to gain a more comprehensive understanding of biospecimens and common derivatives involved in those studies and identify opportunities for advancing the field. Data available for 1,018 extramural, peer-reviewed grants (active as of July 2012) supported by the Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (DCCPS), the NCI Division that supports cancer control and population-science extramural research grants, were analyzed. 455 of the grants were determined to involve biospecimens or derivatives. The most common specimen types included were whole blood (51% of grants), serum or plasma (40%), tissue (39%), and the biospecimen derivative, DNA (66%). While use of biospecimens in molecular epidemiology has become common, biospecimens for behavioral and social research is emerging, as observed in our analysis. Additionally, we found the majority of grants were using already existing biospecimens (63%). Grants that involved use of existing biospecimens resulted in lower costs (studies that used existing serum/plasma biospecimens were 4.2 times less expensive) and more publications per year (1.4 times) than grants collecting new biospecimens. This analysis serves as a first step at understanding the types of biospecimen collections supported by NCI DCCPS. There is room to encourage increased use of archived biospecimens and new collections of rarer specimen and cancer types, as well as for behavioral and social research. To facilitate these efforts, we are working to better catalogue our funded resources and make that data available to the extramural community.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25162460      PMCID: PMC4150371          DOI: 10.1089/bio.2014.0009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank        ISSN: 1947-5543            Impact factor:   2.300


  21 in total

Review 1.  Genetic epidemiology with a capital E, ten years after.

Authors:  Muin J Khoury; Marta Gwinn; Mindy Clyne; Wei Yu
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.135

Review 2.  Focus on methodology: salivary bioscience and research on adolescence: an integrated perspective.

Authors:  Douglas A Granger; Christine K Fortunato; Emilie K Beltzer; Marta Virag; Melissa A Bright; Dorothée Out
Journal:  J Adolesc       Date:  2012-03-07

3.  What makes UK Biobank special?

Authors:  Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-03-31       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Q&A: Anna Barker on the cancer genome atlas.

Authors:  Anna Barker
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 5.  Preanalytical quality improvement: in quality we trust.

Authors:  Giuseppe Lippi; Kathleen Becan-McBride; Darina Behúlová; Raffick A Bowen; Stephen Church; Joris Delanghe; Kjell Grankvist; Steve Kitchen; Mads Nybo; Matthias Nauck; Nora Nikolac; Vladimir Palicka; Mario Plebani; Sverre Sandberg; Ana-Maria Simundic
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  MicroRNA profiling of clear cell renal cell carcinoma by whole-genome small RNA deep sequencing of paired frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens.

Authors:  Lihong Weng; Xiwei Wu; Hanlin Gao; Bing Mu; Xuejun Li; Jin-Hui Wang; Chao Guo; Jennifer M Jin; Zhuo Chen; Maricela Covarrubias; Yate-Ching Yuan; Lawrence M Weiss; Huiqing Wu
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.996

7.  Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality.

Authors:  Helen M Moore; Andrea Kelly; Scott D Jewell; Lisa M McShane; Douglas P Clark; Renata Greenspan; Pierre Hainaut; Daniel F Hayes; Paula Kim; Elizabeth Mansfield; Olga Potapova; Peter Riegman; Yaffa Rubinstein; Edward Seijo; Stella Somiari; Peter Watson; Heinz-Ulrich Weier; Claire Zhu; Jim Vaught
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 2.300

8.  Global mutational profiling of formalin-fixed human colon cancers from a pathology archive.

Authors:  Mark D Adams; Martina L Veigl; Zhenghe Wang; Neil Molyneux; Shuying Sun; Kishore Guda; Xiaoqing Yu; Sanford D Markowitz; Joseph Willis
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2012-08-10       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 9.  Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Jan P Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G Altman; Peter C Gøtzsche; Cynthia D Mulrow; Stuart J Pocock; Charles Poole; James J Schlesselman; Matthias Egger
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2007-10-16       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Characterizing biobank organizations in the U.S.: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Gail E Henderson; R Jean Cadigan; Teresa P Edwards; Ian Conlon; Anders G Nelson; James P Evans; Arlene M Davis; Catherine Zimmer; Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 11.117

View more
  6 in total

1.  Critical Financial Challenges for Biobanking: Report of a National Cancer Institute Study.

Authors:  Abhi Rao; Jim Vaught; Bill Tulskie; Dorie Olson; Hana Odeh; Jeffrey McLean; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  Implementation of a comprehensive fertility biobanking initiative.

Authors:  Anjali Wignarajah; Ruben Alvero; Ruth B Lathi; Lusine Aghajanova; Michael Eisenberg; Virginia D Winn; Barry Behr; Gayathree Murugappan
Journal:  F S Sci       Date:  2022-01-13

3.  Establishing a reproductive biorepository for basic and translational research: experience developing the reproductive subjects registry and sample repository.

Authors:  Samantha B Schon; Nicholas Raja; Min Xu; Heather Cameron; Kun Yang; Jayne Reynolds; Dee Fenner; Erica E Marsh
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 4.  Brain tumor biobanking in the precision medicine era: building a high-quality resource for translational research in neuro-oncology.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Karen Devine; Jordonna Fulop; Yingli Wolinsky; Peter Liao; Lindsay Stetson; Marta Couce; Andrew E Sloan; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2016-12-30

5.  Delta-S-Cys-Albumin: A Lab Test that Quantifies Cumulative Exposure of Archived Human Blood Plasma and Serum Samples to Thawed Conditions.

Authors:  Joshua W Jeffs; Nilojan Jehanathan; Stephanie M F Thibert; Shadi Ferdosi; Linda Pham; Zachary T Wilson; Christian Breburda; Chad R Borges
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 5.911

6.  How Semantics Connotations May Influence Concerns About Donation of Biospecimens.

Authors:  Stacey A Page; Beverly Anne Collisson; Jenny Godley; Danny Nguyen; Luanne Metz; Daniel Muruve
Journal:  Biopreserv Biobank       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.256

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.