Literature DB >> 29675899

Structure refinement of membrane proteins via molecular dynamics simulations.

Bercem Dutagaci1, Lim Heo1, Michael Feig1.   

Abstract

A refinement protocol based on physics-based techniques established for water soluble proteins is tested for membrane protein structures. Initial structures were generated by homology modeling and sampled via molecular dynamics simulations in explicit lipid bilayer and aqueous solvent systems. Snapshots from the simulations were selected based on scoring with either knowledge-based or implicit membrane-based scoring functions and averaged to obtain refined models. The protocol resulted in consistent and significant refinement of the membrane protein structures similar to the performance of refinement methods for soluble proteins. Refinement success was similar between sampling in the presence of lipid bilayers and aqueous solvent but the presence of lipid bilayers may benefit the improvement of lipid-facing residues. Scoring with knowledge-based functions (DFIRE and RWplus) was found to be as good as scoring using implicit membrane-based scoring functions suggesting that differences in internal packing is more important than orientations relative to the membrane during the refinement of membrane protein homology models.
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  homology models; implicit membrane model; membrane protein structure prediction; molecular dynamics simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29675899      PMCID: PMC6013386          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  63 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Ab initio protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Corey Hardin; Taras V Pogorelov; Zaida Luthey-Schulten
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 6.809

3.  Protein structure prediction and structural genomics.

Authors:  D Baker; A Sali
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-10-05       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules.

Authors:  T L Blundell; B L Sibanda; M J Sternberg; J M Thornton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Mar 26-Apr 1       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  CHARMM-GUI Membrane Builder toward realistic biological membrane simulations.

Authors:  Emilia L Wu; Xi Cheng; Sunhwan Jo; Huan Rui; Kevin C Song; Eder M Dávila-Contreras; Yifei Qi; Jumin Lee; Viviana Monje-Galvan; Richard M Venable; Jeffery B Klauda; Wonpil Im
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Membrane protein native state discrimination by implicit membrane models.

Authors:  Olga Yuzlenko; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.376

7.  Optimization of the additive CHARMM all-atom protein force field targeting improved sampling of the backbone φ, ψ and side-chain χ(1) and χ(2) dihedral angles.

Authors:  Robert B Best; Xiao Zhu; Jihyun Shim; Pedro E M Lopes; Jeetain Mittal; Michael Feig; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  Determination of Hydrophobic Lengths of Membrane Proteins with the HDGB Implicit Membrane Model.

Authors:  Bercem Dutagaci; Michael Feig
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 4.956

9.  MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography.

Authors:  Vincent B Chen; W Bryan Arendall; Jeffrey J Headd; Daniel A Keedy; Robert M Immormino; Gary J Kapral; Laura W Murray; Jane S Richardson; David C Richardson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-12-21

10.  An Integrated Framework Advancing Membrane Protein Modeling and Design.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Julia Koehler Leman; Brian D Weitzner; Amanda M Duran; Drew C Tilley; Assaf Elazar; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  8 in total

1.  A free-energy landscape for the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor GLP1R.

Authors:  Raphael Alhadeff; Arieh Warshel
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-08-02

Review 2.  Generalized Born Implicit Solvent Models for Biomolecules.

Authors:  Alexey V Onufriev; David A Case
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 12.981

3.  Guardians of the Cell: State-of-the-Art of Membrane Proteins from a Computational Point-of-View.

Authors:  Nícia Rosário-Ferreira; Catarina Marques-Pereira; Raquel P Gouveia; Joana Mourão; Irina S Moreira
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

4.  Can molecular dynamics simulations improve the structural accuracy and virtual screening performance of GPCR models?

Authors:  Jon Kapla; Ismael Rodríguez-Espigares; Flavio Ballante; Jana Selent; Jens Carlsson
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Diverse Scientific Benchmarks for Implicit Membrane Energy Functions.

Authors:  Rebecca F Alford; Rituparna Samanta; Jeffrey J Gray
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 6.578

Review 6.  Methods for the Refinement of Protein Structure 3D Models.

Authors:  Recep Adiyaman; Liam James McGuffin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Mitochondrial Uncoupling Protein 2.

Authors:  Sanja Škulj; Zlatko Brkljača; Jürgen Kreiter; Elena E Pohl; Mario Vazdar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Computational discovery of binding mode of anti-TRBC1 antibody and predicted key amino acids of TRBC1.

Authors:  Jirakrit Saetang; Surasak Sangkhathat; Nawaphat Jangphattananont; Wannakorn Khopanlert; Jakrawadee Julamanee; Varomyalin Tipmanee
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.