| Literature DB >> 29670919 |
Theodore S Kapellos1, Kevin Bassler1, Anna C Aschenbrenner1, Wataru Fujii1, Joachim L Schultze1,2.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a diverse respiratory disease characterised by bronchiolitis, small airway obstruction, and emphysema. Innate immune cells play a pivotal role in the disease's progression, and in particular, lung macrophages exploit their prevalence and strategic localisation to orchestrate immune responses. To date, alveolar and interstitial resident macrophages as well as blood monocytes have been described in the lungs of patients with COPD contributing to disease pathology by changes in their functional repertoire. In this review, we summarise recent evidence from human studies and work with animal models of COPD with regard to altered functions of each of these myeloid cell populations. We primarily focus on the dysregulated capacity of alveolar macrophages to secrete proinflammatory mediators and proteases, induce oxidative stress, engulf microbes and apoptotic cells, and express surface and intracellular markers in patients with COPD. In addition, we discuss the differences in the responses between alveolar macrophages and interstitial macrophages/monocytes in the disease and propose how the field should advance to better understand the implications of lung macrophage functions in COPD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29670919 PMCID: PMC5835245 DOI: 10.1155/2018/2349045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunol Res ISSN: 2314-7156 Impact factor: 4.818
Figure 1Murine and human lung macrophage populations under steady-state conditions. AMs reside at the airspaces of the lung, while IMs localise in the interstitial space between the alveoli and blood vessels. In both the murine and human lungs, there is also a monocyte population which enters the tissue from blood vessels. AMs are the biggest of all three lung macrophage populations, are potent phagocytes, and secrete a range of proinflammatory mediators. IMs are smaller than AMs but display comparable phagocytic capacity and ability to produce soluble factors. They are believed to serve as an intermediate step in monocyte differentiation towards AMs and demonstrate proliferative potential. Finally, monocytes are sensitive to migratory gradients and have been shown to exhibit proinflammatory mediator capacity, but no antigen presentation. The currently acceptable nomenclatures for AMs, IMs, and monocytes in mice (Mm) and humans (Hs) are indicated next to each population.
Figure 2Lung macrophage population functions in COPD. AMs exhibit alterations in their physiological responses in COPD; the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines is dysregulated (1). The cells undergo oxidative stress and secrete ROS and nitrite species into the lung micro-environment (2), they store intracellularly large amounts of iron (2), and they overexpress and release proteases which cause alveolar tissue destruction (3). In contrast, processes, such as phagocytosis of microbes (4) and apoptotic neutrophils or epithelial cells (5), are downregulated in AMs from patients with COPD, an observation which could explain the frequent colonisation of the lungs with bacteria and viruses in exacerbations. In the meantime, monocytes are recruited from blood vessels following chemokine gradients and contribute to disease pathology via the secretion of proinflammatory mediators and proteases. It is also believed that monocytes differentiate into macrophages via an intermediate step of IMs which morphologically and functionally resemble monocytes.
Molecules differentially expressed by AMs from animals or patients with COPD compared to healthy controls.
| Molecule family | Encoded proteins | References |
|---|---|---|
| Cytokines | TNF- | [ |
| Chemokines | IL-8 ↓, CCL2 ↑, CCL5 ↓, CCL7 ↑, CCL13 ↑, CCL22 ↑, Cxcl10 ↓, CXCL9 ↓, CXCL10 ↓, CXCL11 ↓ | [ |
| Chemokine receptors | CCR2 ↑, CCR5 ↑ | [ |
| Prostaglandin metabolism | PTGS1 ↑, PTGS2 ↑ | [ |
| Oxidative stress | GSH ↓, Gsh ↓, iNOS ↑, HO-1 ↓ | [ |
| Iron metabolism | Hemosiderin ↑, | [ |
| Proteinases | MMP-1 ↑, MMP-2 ↑, MMP-7 ↑, | [ |
| Neutrophil proteases and inhibitors |
| [ |
| Chitinolytic activity | CHIT1 ↑, YKL-40 ↑ | [ |
| Recognition markers | CD31 ↓, CD44 ↓, CD91 ↓, CR-3 ↑, CR-4 ↑, DC-SIGN ↑, MARCO ↓ | [ |
| Cytoskeletal rearrangements | RAC1 ↓, VAV1 ↓, RhoA ↑ | [ |
| Mitochondrial stress | MCL-1 ↑ | [ |
| Integrins, scavenger receptors, and adhesion molecules | CD11a ↓, CD11c ↑, CD163 ↑, CD204 ↑, CD206 ↑, MSR-1 (SNPs), MERTK ↑ | [ |
| Antigen presentation molecules | MHC-I ↓, MHC-II ↓, HLA-DR ↓, CD80 ↓ | [ |
| Fc gamma receptors, PRRs | Fc | [ |
Molecules differentially expressed by monocytes or IMs from animals or patients with COPD compared to healthy controls.
| Molecule family | Encoded proteins | References |
|---|---|---|
| Cytokines | TNF- | [ |
| Chemokines | CCL2 ↑, IL-8 ↓ | [ |
| Chemokine receptors | CCR2 ↑ | [ |
| Metalloproteinases | MMP-9 ↓, Mmp-12 ↑ | [ |
| Antigen presentation molecules | CD86 ↓ | [ |
| Integrins, PRRs | CD11b ↓, CD14 ↓, CD54 ↓ | [ |
| MicroRNAs | miR-24-3p ↑, miR-93-5p ↑, miR-320a ↑, miR-320b ↑, miR1273g-3p ↓ | [ |
Figure 3Future directions in COPD lung macrophage population research. Recent advances in Immunogenetics and Structural Biology make it possible to evaluate the heterogeneity of lung macrophage populations. In particular, single cell RNA sequencing can identify homogeneous macrophage subsets with distinct transcriptomes and functions. Mass cytometry can complement and validate initial findings establishing prognosis/diagnosis biomarkers for human patients with COPD. Moreover, analysis of the nuclear heterochromatin state with ATAC sequencing and subsequent validation with ChIP-sequencing can shed light on the epigenetic regulation of lung macrophage populations and highlight the molecular mechanisms responsible for their functions in vivo. Lastly, the role of AMs, IMs, and lung monocytes warrants further investigation in order to better understand the contributions of each macrophage population to COPD progression and severity. Transcriptome analysis will determine whether these populations are distinct or part of a differentiation continuum from the monocyte to the AM phenotype and will associate gene expression with unique biological processes.