BACKGROUND: The role of bacterial pathogens in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is controversial. In older studies, the rates of isolation of bacterial pathogens from sputum were the same during acute exacerbations and during stable disease. However, these studies did not differentiate among strains within a bacterial species and therefore could not detect changes in strains over time. We hypothesized that the acquisition of a new strain of a pathogenic bacterial species is associated with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in which clinical information and sputum samples for culture were collected monthly and during exacerbations from 81 outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Molecular typing of sputum isolates of nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was performed. RESULTS: Over a period of 56 months, the 81 patients made a total of 1975 clinic visits, 374 of which were made during exacerbations (mean, 2.1 per patient per year). On the basis of molecular typing, an exacerbation was diagnosed at 33.0 percent of the clinic visits that involved isolation of a new strain of a bacterial pathogen, as compared with 15.4 percent of visits at which no new strain was isolated (P<0.001; relative risk of an exacerbation, 2.15; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.83 to 2.53). Isolation of a new strain of H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, or S. pneumoniae was associated with a significantly increased risk of an exacerbation. CONCLUSIONS: The association between an exacerbation and the isolation of a new strain of a bacterial pathogen supports the causative role of bacteria in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society
BACKGROUND: The role of bacterial pathogens in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is controversial. In older studies, the rates of isolation of bacterial pathogens from sputum were the same during acute exacerbations and during stable disease. However, these studies did not differentiate among strains within a bacterial species and therefore could not detect changes in strains over time. We hypothesized that the acquisition of a new strain of a pathogenic bacterial species is associated with exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study in which clinical information and sputum samples for culture were collected monthly and during exacerbations from 81 outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Molecular typing of sputum isolates of nonencapsulated Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was performed. RESULTS: Over a period of 56 months, the 81 patients made a total of 1975 clinic visits, 374 of which were made during exacerbations (mean, 2.1 per patient per year). On the basis of molecular typing, an exacerbation was diagnosed at 33.0 percent of the clinic visits that involved isolation of a new strain of a bacterial pathogen, as compared with 15.4 percent of visits at which no new strain was isolated (P<0.001; relative risk of an exacerbation, 2.15; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.83 to 2.53). Isolation of a new strain of H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, or S. pneumoniae was associated with a significantly increased risk of an exacerbation. CONCLUSIONS: The association between an exacerbation and the isolation of a new strain of a bacterial pathogen supports the causative role of bacteria in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Copyright 2002 Massachusetts Medical Society
Authors: G Caramori; M Romagnoli; P Casolari; C Bellettato; G Casoni; P Boschetto; K F Chung; P J Barnes; I M Adcock; A Ciaccia; L M Fabbri; A Papi Journal: Thorax Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 9.139
Authors: Shyamala Ganesan; Andrea N Faris; Adam T Comstock; Joanne Sonstein; Jeffrey L Curtis; Uma S Sajjan Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-11-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: M Woodhead; F Blasi; S Ewig; J Garau; G Huchon; M Ieven; A Ortqvist; T Schaberg; A Torres; G van der Heijden; R Read; T J M Verheij Journal: Clin Microbiol Infect Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 8.067
Authors: Melinda M Pettigrew; Christian P Ahearn; Janneane F Gent; Yong Kong; Mary C Gallo; James B Munro; Adonis D'Mello; Sanjay Sethi; Hervé Tettelin; Timothy F Murphy Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-03-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Helena M Linge; Cecilia Andersson; Sara L Nordin; Anders I Olin; Ann-Cathrine Petersson; Matthias Mörgelin; Amanda Welin; Johan Bylund; Leif Bjermer; Jonas Erjefält; Arne Egesten Journal: Mol Med Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Dheeraj Gupta; Ritesh Agarwal; Ashutosh Nath Aggarwal; V N Maturu; Sahajal Dhooria; K T Prasad; Inderpaul S Sehgal; Lakshmikant B Yenge; Aditya Jindal; Navneet Singh; A G Ghoshal; G C Khilnani; J K Samaria; S N Gaur; D Behera Journal: Lung India Date: 2013-07
Authors: S Vamsee Raju; Hyunki Kim; Stephen A Byzek; Li Ping Tang; John E Trombley; Patricia Jackson; Lawrence Rasmussen; J Michael Wells; Emily Falk Libby; Erik Dohm; Lindy Winter; Sharon L Samuel; Kurt R Zinn; J Edwin Blalock; Trenton R Schoeb; Mark T Dransfield; Steven M Rowe Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2016-09-22