Literature DB >> 9160840

Functional, morphological, and phenotypical differences between rat alveolar and interstitial macrophages.

A Johansson1, M Lundborg, C M Sköld, J Lundahl, G Tornling, A Eklund, P Camner.   

Abstract

Alveolar macrophages (AM) and interstitial macrophages (IM) from rat lungs were characterized with respect to morphology, phagocytosis, adhesion properties, and phenotype. AM were recovered by lung lavage and IM by treatment of the lung tissue with DNAse and collagenase. The AM were enzyme treated in the same way as the IM. The IM were smaller than AM and had a higher nuclear to cytoplasm ratio. They had markedly lower phagocytic capacity. The attachment of particles to the cell surface was significantly lower in IM than in AM, but the capacity to ingest the particles was the same. Adherence to vitronectin- as well as fibronectin-coated surfaces was significantly higher in AM. The phagolysosomal pH was similar in IM and AM, around pH 5, indicating that dissolution of inorganic particles can take place effectively also in IM. Five surface receptors were studied, and the expression differed significantly in all five between AM and IM. The expression of OX-1 (CD 45), a common leukocyte antigen, was significantly higher on AM as was the expression of CD 71 (transferrin receptor). The receptor density for OX-42 was higher on a fraction of IM. This might be compatible with a stronger interaction between these cells and, for example, matrix components. IM had more surface antigen expressing MHC class Ia (OX-6) and CD 54. Both receptors are important for the antigen presentation capacity of macrophages. These findings show profound differences in phenotype between AM and IM and indicate that IM is a highly immunocompetent cell and should not be regarded only as a precursor to AM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9160840     DOI: 10.1165/ajrcmb.16.5.9160840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol        ISSN: 1044-1549            Impact factor:   6.914


  20 in total

1.  Pulmonary V beta 4+ T cells from Histoplasma capsulatum-infected mice respond to a homologue of Sec31 that confers a protective response.

Authors:  Mark R Scheckelhoff; George S Deepe
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2006-02-09       Impact factor: 5.226

2.  Nano-engineered erythrocyte ghosts as inhalational carriers for delivery of fasudil: preparation and characterization.

Authors:  Nilesh Gupta; Brijeshkumar Patel; Fakhrul Ahsan
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Influence of mast cells on the expression of adhesion molecules on circulating and migrating leukocytes in acute pancreatitis-associated lung injury.

Authors:  Xia Zhao; Marwan Dib; Xiangdong Wang; Bengt Widegren; Roland Andersson
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 4.  Macrophage immunoregulatory pathways in tuberculosis.

Authors:  Murugesan V S Rajaram; Bin Ni; Claire E Dodd; Larry S Schlesinger
Journal:  Semin Immunol       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 11.130

5.  Cultured human corneal epithelial stem/progenitor cells derived from the corneal limbus.

Authors:  Naoki Yamamoto; Koji Hirano; Hajime Kojima; Mariko Sumitomo; Hiromi Yamashita; Masahiko Ayaki; Koki Taniguchi; Atsuhiro Tanikawa; Masayuki Horiguchi
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.416

6.  Basic study of retinal stem/progenitor cell separation from mouse iris tissue.

Authors:  Naoki Yamamoto; Atsuhiro Tanikawa; Masayuki Horiguchi
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 7.  Imaging of macrophage-related lung diseases.

Authors:  Katharina Marten; David M Hansell
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-01-05       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Proteomic Signature Reveals Modulation of Human Macrophage Polarization and Functions Under Differing Environmental Oxygen Conditions.

Authors:  Magali Court; Graciane Petre; Michèle El Atifi; Arnaud Millet
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  Lung cell responses to M. tuberculosis in genetically susceptible and resistant mice following intratracheal challenge.

Authors:  E B Eruslanov; K B Majorov; M O Orlova; V V Mischenko; T K Kondratieva; A S Apt; I V Lyadova
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Phenotypic and Functional Heterogeneity of Low-Density and High-Density Human Lung Macrophages.

Authors:  Barbara Balestrieri; Francescopaolo Granata; Stefania Loffredo; Angelica Petraroli; Giulia Scalia; Paolo Morabito; Chiara Cardamone; Gilda Varricchi; Massimo Triggiani
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2021-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.