Literature DB >> 29657180

Views of Low-Income Women of Color at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer.

Emily E Anderson, Silvia Tejada, Richard B Warnecke, Kent Hoskins.   

Abstract

Individual risk assessment (IRA) for breast cancer may increase adherence to risk-appropriate screening and prevention measures. However, knowledge gaps exist regarding how best to communicate IRA results and support women at increased risk in future health care decisions, in part because patients conceptualize and make meaning of risk differently from the medical community. Better understanding the views of low-income women of color identified as being at increased risk for breast cancer can inform efforts to conduct IRA in an ethical and respectful manner. We conducted in-depth interviews with 13 low-income African American and Latina women who receive care at a federally qualified health center (FQHC) and had recently learned of their increased risk for breast cancer. These interviews explored their experience of the IRA process, their interpretation of what being at increased risk means, and their reactions to provider recommendations. Eight key themes were identified. We conclude with recommendations for the implementation of IRA for breast cancer in underserved primary care settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29657180      PMCID: PMC6319261          DOI: 10.1353/nib.2018.0023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth        ISSN: 2157-1740


  26 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

Review 2.  How risk is perceived, constructed and interpreted by clients in clinical genetics, and the effects on decision making: systematic review.

Authors:  Stephanie Sivell; Glyn Elwyn; Clara L Gaff; Angus J Clarke; Rachel Iredale; Chris Shaw; Joanna Dundon; Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.

Authors:  Debbie Saslow; Carla Boetes; Wylie Burke; Steven Harms; Martin O Leach; Constance D Lehman; Elizabeth Morris; Etta Pisano; Mitchell Schnall; Stephen Sener; Robert A Smith; Ellen Warner; Martin Yaffe; Kimberly S Andrews; Christy A Russell
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Validation of a tool for identifying women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer in population-based screening.

Authors:  Kent F Hoskins; Alice Zwaagstra; Michael Ranz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Perceived cancer risk: why is it lower among nonwhites than whites?

Authors:  Heather Orom; Marc T Kiviniemi; Willie Underwood; Levi Ross; Vickie L Shavers
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Validation of the pedigree assessment tool (PAT) in families with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  P Teller; K F Hoskins; A Zwaagstra; C Stanislaw; R Iyengar; V L Green; S G A Gabram
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 7.  Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ward; Ahmedin Jemal; Vilma Cokkinides; Gopal K Singh; Cheryll Cardinez; Asma Ghafoor; Michael Thun
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Projecting individualized absolute invasive breast cancer risk in African American women.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail; Joseph P Costantino; David Pee; Melissa Bondy; Lisa Newman; Mano Selvan; Garnet L Anderson; Kathleen E Malone; Polly A Marchbanks; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Sandra A Norman; Michael S Simon; Robert Spirtas; Giske Ursin; Leslie Bernstein
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Narrative accounts of hereditary risk: knowledge about family history, lay theories of disease, and "internal" and "external" causation.

Authors:  Tom Sanders; Rona Campbell; Jenny Donovan; Debbie Sharp
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2007-04

10.  Rational choice(s)? Rethinking decision-making on breast cancer risk and screening mammography.

Authors:  Mandana Vahabi; Denise Gastaldo
Journal:  Nurs Inq       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.393

View more
  2 in total

1.  Accuracy of Perceived Breast Cancer Risk in Black and White Women with an Elevated Risk.

Authors:  Jessica M L Young; Kristen J Vogel Postula; Debra Duquette; Melissa Gutierrez-Kapheim; Vivian Pan; Maria C Katapodi
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.006

2.  The introduction of risk stratified screening into the NHS breast screening Programme: views from British-Pakistani women.

Authors:  Victoria G Woof; Helen Ruane; David P French; Fiona Ulph; Nadeem Qureshi; Nasaim Khan; D Gareth Evans; Louise S Donnelly
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2020-05-20       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.