Literature DB >> 35497400

Accuracy of Perceived Breast Cancer Risk in Black and White Women with an Elevated Risk.

Jessica M L Young1, Kristen J Vogel Postula2, Debra Duquette1, Melissa Gutierrez-Kapheim3, Vivian Pan3, Maria C Katapodi4.   

Abstract

Introduction: Perceived breast cancer risk predicts screening behaviors. However, perceived risk is often inaccurate, notably in Black women, who often underestimate their risk despite having higher disease-specific mortality rates. We examined predictors of perceived breast cancer risk, and its impact on surveillance.
Methods: We used baseline data from a randomized trial targeting unaffected women recruited by relatives with early-onset breast cancer. Data collection occurred between 2012 and 2013. Accuracy of perceived risk was assessed by comparing perceived risk to objective lifetime breast cancer risks, calculated with the Gail and Claus models. A multivariate mixed model regression examined predictors of accuracy of perceived risk. The impact of perceived risk on breast cancer surveillance was assessed with one-way ANOVAS comparing Black to White women.
Results: Among participants, 21.4% self-identified as Black and 78.6% as White. Overall, 72.9% (n=247/339), 16.2% (n=55/339), and 10.9% (n=37/339) of participants overestimated, accurately perceived, and underestimated, respectively, their lifetime breast cancer risk. Race did not predict the accuracy of risk perception. Younger participants were more likely to overestimate their risk (β=-.455; CI [-.772, -.138]; P=.005). MRI utilization was predicted by a higher objective risk (F 1,263 [= 30.271]; P<.001) and more accurate risk perception (P=.010; Fisher's exact test). Conclusions: Most women with a family history of early-onset breast cancer inaccurately perceived their risk for developing the disease. Younger women were more likely to overestimate their risk. Findings can guide the development of tailored interventions to improve adherence to breast cancer surveillance recommendations.
Copyright © 2022, Ethnicity & Disease, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Early-onset Breast Cancer; Family History; Health Disparities; Surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35497400      PMCID: PMC9037653          DOI: 10.18865/ed.32.2.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethn Dis        ISSN: 1049-510X            Impact factor:   2.006


  29 in total

1.  Validating and improving models for projecting the absolute risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Gail; J P Costantino
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-03-07       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Understanding Decision Making about Breast Cancer Prevention in Action: The Intersection of Perceived Risk, Perceived Control, and Social Context: NRG Oncology/NSABP DMP-1.

Authors:  Christine M Gunn; Barbara G Bokhour; Victoria A Parker; Tracy A Battaglia; Patricia A Parker; Angela Fagerlin; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Hanna Bandos; Sarah B Blakeslee; Christine Holmberg
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  Family history and the risk of breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  P D Pharoah; N E Day; S Duffy; D F Easton; B A Ponder
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1997-05-29       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Ethnic differences in risk perception among women at increased risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  C Hughes; C Lerman; E Lustbader
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Factors associated with breast MRI use: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Brigid K Killelea; Donald R Lannin; Laura J Horvath; Nina R Horowitz; Anees B Chagpar
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  Breast cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Carol E DeSantis; Jiemin Ma; Mia M Gaudet; Lisa A Newman; Kimberly D Miller; Ann Goding Sauer; Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca L Siegel
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 7.  Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2001-10-27       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  First-degree relatives of breast-cancer patients: cognitive perceptions, coping, and adherence to breast self-examination.

Authors:  Miri Cohen
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.104

9.  Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice.

Authors:  Karen J Wernli; Wendy B DeMartini; Laura Ichikawa; Constance D Lehman; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Louise M Henderson; Berta M Geller; Mike Hofmann; Bonnie C Yankaskas
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Accuracy of perceived risk of recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Maria Pérez; Rebecca L Aft; Kerry Massman; Erica Robinson; Stephanie Myles; Mario Schootman; William E Gillanders; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 4.254

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.