Literature DB >> 14622371

Rational choice(s)? Rethinking decision-making on breast cancer risk and screening mammography.

Mandana Vahabi1, Denise Gastaldo.   

Abstract

Women who refrain from undergoing breast cancer screening are believed to be uninformed about risks and usually labeled as irrational. Our purpose in writing this paper is to challenge the traditional notion of rational behaviour, illustrating with qualitative data that people's rationality is influenced by their socio-cultural and political identities. We explore three major themes: (1) cultural explanations regarding intention to use screening mammography (2) (dis)trust in science and expert opinion, and (3) self-responsibility and self-surveillance in caring for one's body. Understanding that women rely on different risk discourses to make decisions about their health should aide researchers, health professionals, and the community in better understanding alternative ways of conceptualizing people's health-related behaviours when they do not coincide with health authorities recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14622371     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00190.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Inq        ISSN: 1320-7881            Impact factor:   2.393


  6 in total

1.  Views of Low-Income Women of Color at Increased Risk for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Emily E Anderson; Silvia Tejada; Richard B Warnecke; Kent Hoskins
Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth       Date:  2018

2.  Living in the context of poverty and trajectories of breast cancer worry, knowledge, and perceived risk after a breast cancer risk education session.

Authors:  Suzanne Bartle-Haring
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2010-08-05

3.  Motivations and reasons for women attending a breast self-examination training program: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Rea-Jeng Yang; Lian-Hua Huang; Yeu-Sheng Hsieh; Ue-Lin Chung; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Herng-Dar Bih
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 2.809

4.  Predicting the use of individualized risk assessment for breast cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne Bartle-Haring; Paula Toviessi; Heather Katafiasz
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2008 Mar-Apr

5.  Staging mammography nonadherent women: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Nancy LaPelle; Mary E Costanza; Roger Luckmann; Milagros C Rosal; Mary Jo White; Jennifer Rider Stark
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.771

6.  Cervical cancer screening service utilisation in UK.

Authors:  Alexander Labeit; Frank Peinemann; Abbi Kedir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.