Literature DB >> 29641835

Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation.

Francesco Multinu1,2, Jvan Casarin1, Kristine T Hanson3, Stefano Angioni2, Andrea Mariani1,3, Elizabeth B Habermann4, Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso1,3.   

Abstract

Importance: In November 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a black box warning against the use of power morcellation for excision of uterine fibroids to decrease the risk of disseminating malignant cells and worsening survival outcomes of patients with unexpected malignant neoplasms. After the FDA statement was issued, studies showed decreased rates of minimally invasive surgery and increased rates of open abdominal hysterectomy. However, there are limited and controversial data on the association of these changed rates with 30-day hysterectomy complications. Objective: To assess changes in the rates of 30-day major and minor complications of hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications following the FDA-issued statement. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database and included 603 hospitals participating between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2015. Thirty-day posthysterectomy complications were compared before and after the FDA-issued warning. Women who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications (n = 75 487), including hysterectomies with indication of uterine fibroids (n = 25 571), were included. Complication rates and procedure distributions between the periods were compared with χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient and operative factors. Main Outcomes and Measures: Major and minor 30-day complication rates before (from 2013 through the first quarter of 2014) and after (from the fourth quarter of 2014 through 2015) the FDA-issued warning.
Results: Of 75 487 women (mean [SD] age, 47.8 [10.7] years) who underwent hysterectomy for benign gynecologic indications, 32 186 (42.6%) were treated before and 43 301 (57.4%) after the FDA-issued warning. Non-Hispanic white women comprised most (59.4%) of the total population, followed by African American women (15.1%). Overall, major and minor complications remained stable before and after the FDA-issued warning. By contrast, among a subset of 25 571 women (33.9%) who underwent hysterectomy for uterine fibroids, major complications significantly increased after the FDA-issued warning from 1.9% to 2.4% (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CI, 1.04-1.47; P = .02), and minor complications significantly increased from 2.7% to 3.3% (adjusted OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.04-1.40; P = .01). In this subgroup, the rate of open abdominal surgery increased from 37.2% to 43.0%, and the rate of minimally invasive surgery (total laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy, and laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy) decreased from 56.1% to 49.7% (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Major and minor 30-day complication rates among women undergoing hysterectomy for uterine fibroids increased following the FDA-issued statement. This increased risk corresponding with a decreased use of minimally invasive surgery should be balanced against the potential harms of morcellation during a shared decision-making process between clinician and patient. Regulatory bodies and medical societies should consider these findings when issuing relevant communications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29641835      PMCID: PMC6145653          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  20 in total

1.  An update on inpatient hysterectomy routes in the United States.

Authors:  Vrunda B Desai; Xiao Xu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Barron; Tere Richard; Patricia S Robinson; Georgine Lamvu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.

Authors:  John A Harris; Carolyn W Swenson; Shitanshu Uppal; Neil Kamdar; Nichole Mahnert; Sawsan As-Sanie; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Incidence of uterine leiomyosarcoma and endometrial stromal sarcoma in Nordic countries: results from NORDCAN and NOCCA databases.

Authors:  R Koivisto-Korander; J I Martinsen; E Weiderpass; A Leminen; E Pukkala
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  N-of-1 Policymaking--Tragedy, Trade-offs, and the Demise of Morcellation.

Authors:  Lisa Rosenbaum
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.

Authors:  Maura K Whiteman; Susan D Hillis; Denise J Jamieson; Brian Morrow; Michelle N Podgornik; Kate M Brett; Polly A Marchbanks
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Jennifer Tsui; Cande V Ananth; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Impact of the 2014 Food and Drug Administration Warnings Against Power Morcellation.

Authors:  Deirdre A Lum; Eric R Sokol; Jonathan S Berek; Jay Schulkin; Ling Chen; Cora-Ann McElwain; Jason D Wright
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.137

9.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroid tumors in premenopausal women: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Matthew T Siedhoff; Stephanie B Wheeler; Sarah E Rutstein; Elizabeth J Geller; Kemi M Doll; Jennifer M Wu; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 10.  Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease.

Authors:  Johanna W M Aarts; Theodoor E Nieboer; Neil Johnson; Emma Tavender; Ray Garry; Ben Willem J Mol; Kirsten B Kluivers
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-12
View more
  8 in total

1.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities/Differences in Hysterectomy Route in Women Likely Eligible for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Lisa M Pollack; Margaret A Olsen; Sarah J Gehlert; Su-Hsin Chang; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.137

2.  Incidence of sarcoma in patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications: a population-based study.

Authors:  Francesco Multinu; Jvan Casarin; Lucia Tortorella; Yajue Huang; Amy Weaver; Stefano Angioni; Gian Benedetto Melis; Andrea Mariani; Elizabeth A Stewart; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Hospital variation in responses to safety warnings about power morcellation in hysterectomy.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Vrunda B Desai; Jason D Wright; Haiqun Lin; Peter E Schwartz; Cary P Gross
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 10.693

4.  Association of demographic, clinical, and hospital-related factors with use of robotic hysterectomy for benign indications: A national database study.

Authors:  Anna Jo B Smith; Abdelrahman AlAshqar; Kate F Chaves; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 5.  What We Know about the Long-Term Risks of Hysterectomy for Benign Indication-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Obianuju Sandra Madueke-Laveaux; Amro Elsharoud; Ayman Al-Hendy
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-16       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  A Novel Multi-Port Containment System for Laparoscopic Power Morcellation to Prevent Tumoral Spread: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Wenhui Wang; Haiyan Liang; Fang Zhao; Huan Yu; Chunhong Rong; Weiwei Feng; Qingyun Chen; Yanjun Yang; Qian Li; Dingqing Feng; Yuxiao Dong; Ming Xue; Jing Liang; Bin Ling
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-02-03

7.  Safety Warning about Laparoscopic Power Morcellation in Hysterectomy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of National Impact.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Vrunda B Desai; Peter E Schwartz; Cary P Gross; Haiqun Lin; Maria J Schymura; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-03-28

8.  Predicting major complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic and open hysterectomy for benign indications.

Authors:  Krupa Madhvani; Silvia Fernandez Garcia; Borja M Fernandez-Felix; Javier Zamora; Tyrone Carpenter; Khalid S Khan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 16.859

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.