Literature DB >> 26314519

Practice patterns and postoperative complications before and after US Food and Drug Administration safety communication on power morcellation.

John A Harris1, Carolyn W Swenson2, Shitanshu Uppal3, Neil Kamdar4, Nichole Mahnert5, Sawsan As-Sanie5, Daniel M Morgan2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In April 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published its first safety communication discouraging "the use of laparoscopic power morcellation during hysterectomy or myomectomy for the treatment of women with uterine fibroids." Due to the concern of worsening outcomes for patients with occult uterine malignancy, specifically uterine leiomyosarcoma, the FDA recommended a significant change to existing surgical planning, patient consent, and surgical technique in the United States.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to report temporal trends in surgical approach to hysterectomy and postoperative complications before and after the April 17, 2014, FDA safety communication concerning the use of power morcellation during myomectomy or hysterectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed with patients undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative from Jan. 1, 2013, through Dec. 31, 2014. The rates of abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal hysterectomy, as well as the rates of major postoperative complications and 30-day hospital readmissions and reoperations, were compared before and after April 17, 2014, the date of the original FDA safety communication. Major postoperative complications included blood transfusions, vaginal cuff infection, vaginal cuff dehiscence, ureteral obstruction, vesicovaginal fistula, deep and organ space surgical site infection, acute renal failure, respiratory failure, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis requiring therapy, cerebral vascular accident, cardiac arrest, and death. We calculated the median episode cost related to hysterectomy readmissions using Michigan Value Collaborative data. Analyses were performed using robust multivariable multinomial and logistic regression models.
RESULTS: There were 18,299 hysterectomies available for analysis during the study period. In all, 2753 cases were excluded due to an indication for cancer, cervical dysplasia, or endometrial hyperplasia, and 174 cases were excluded due to missing covariate data. Compared to the 15 months preceding the FDA safety communication, in the 8 months afterward, utilization of laparoscopic hysterectomies decreased by 4.1% (P = .005) and both abdominal and vaginal hysterectomies increased (1.7%, P = .112 and 2.4%, P = .012, respectively). Major surgical complications not including blood transfusions significantly increased after the date of the FDA safety communication, from 2.2-2.8% (P = .015), and the rate of hospital readmission within 30 days also increased from 3.4-4.2% (P = .025). The rate of all major surgical complications or hospital reoperations did not change significantly after the date of the FDA communication (P = .177 and P = .593, respectively). The median risk-adjusted total episode cost for readmissions was $5847 (interquartile range $5478-10,389).
CONCLUSION: Following the April 2014 FDA safety communication regarding power morcellation, utilization of minimally invasive hysterectomy decreased, and major surgical, nontransfusion complications and 30-day hospital readmissions increased.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  hysterectomy; morcellation; postoperative complications

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26314519     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  28 in total

1.  Rates and Routes of Hysterectomy for Benign Indications in Austria 2002 - 2014.

Authors:  Katharina Maria Edler; Karl Tamussino; Gerhard Fülöp; Evi Reinstadler; Walter Neunteufel; Philipp Reif; Rene Laky; Thomas Aigmüller
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Laparoscopic hysterectomy with morcellation vs abdominal hysterectomy for presumed fibroids: an updated decision analysis following the 2014 Food and Drug Administration safety communications.

Authors:  Matthew T Siedhoff; Kemi M Doll; Daniel L Clarke-Pearson; Sarah E Rutstein
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 3.  Rethinking the Issue of Power Morcellation of Uterine Fibroids: Is Morcellation the Real Problem or Is this Another Symptom of Disparity in Healthcare Provision?

Authors:  Funlayo Odejinmi; Mehrnoosh Aref-Adib; Natasha Liou; Michail Sideris; Rebecca Mallick
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2019 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  Changes in Myomectomy Practice After the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Safety Communication on Power Morcellation.

Authors:  Natalie C Stentz; Laura G Cooney; Mary Sammel; Divya K Shah
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Is Laparoscopic Power Morcellation of Fibroids a Cardinal Sin in 2017?

Authors:  Gautam N Allahbadia
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2017-01-30

6.  Racial/Ethnic Disparities/Differences in Hysterectomy Route in Women Likely Eligible for Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Lisa M Pollack; Margaret A Olsen; Sarah J Gehlert; Su-Hsin Chang; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 4.137

7.  Prevalence of occult pre-malignant or malignant pathology at the time of uterine morcellation for benign disease.

Authors:  Emily C Von Bargen; Cara L Grimes; Kavita Mishra; Rui Wang; Miriam J Haviland; Michele R Hacker; Joseph A Carnevale; Alyssa J Estes; Eman A Elkadry
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.561

8.  Practice Patterns and Complications of Benign Hysterectomy Following the FDA Statement Warning Against the Use of Power Morcellation.

Authors:  Francesco Multinu; Jvan Casarin; Kristine T Hanson; Stefano Angioni; Andrea Mariani; Elizabeth B Habermann; Shannon K Laughlin-Tommaso
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  Outcomes of Robotic Hysterectomy for Treatment of Benign Conditions: Influence of Patient Complexity.

Authors:  Lisa J Herrinton; Tina Raine-Bennett; Liyan Liu; Stacey E Alexeeff; Wilfredo Ramos; Betty Suh-Burgmann
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019-12-18

10.  Occult Malignancy Rate of 1498 Hysterectomies or Myomectomies with Morcellation: A Retrospective Single-Arm Study.

Authors:  Garri Tchartchian; Bernd Bojahr; Sven Becker; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Vasilis Tanos; Hugo C Verhoeven; Markus Wallwiener; Rudy L De Wilde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2018-12-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.