Literature DB >> 32276286

Association of demographic, clinical, and hospital-related factors with use of robotic hysterectomy for benign indications: A national database study.

Anna Jo B Smith1, Abdelrahman AlAshqar1,2, Kate F Chaves3, Mostafa A Borahay1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the association of patient factors, gynecologic diagnoses, and hospital characteristics with utilization of the robotic approach for benign hysterectomy.
METHODS: We performed cross-sectional study of women (n = 725 050) undergoing hysterectomies in the 2012 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample.
RESULTS: A total of 725 050 women underwent inpatient hysterectomy for benign indications: 70345 (10%) were performed robotically. Women were more likely to receive robotic hysterectomy at teaching hospitals (RR 1.60 [95% CI 1.54-1.66]) after adjustment for other patient factors, gynecologic diagnoses, and hospital characteristics. They were more likely to undergo robotic hysterectomy at large (RR 1.34 [95% CI 1.29-1.39]) and for-profit hospitals (RR 1.16 [95% CI 1.11-1.22]). Women were less likely to undergo robotic hysterectomy if they were rural (RR 0.68 [95% CI 0.64-0.72]), African-American (RR 0.78 [95% CI 0.74-0.82]), or publicly insured or uninsured (RR 0.55 [95% CI 0.53-0.57]) women.
CONCLUSION: Significant geographic and hospital-level disparities exist in access to robotic hysterectomy in the United States.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  benign hysterectomy; minimally invasive; racial disparity; robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32276286      PMCID: PMC9206512          DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Robot        ISSN: 1478-5951            Impact factor:   2.483


  29 in total

1.  Regionalization of care for obstetric hemorrhage and its effect on maternal mortality.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Thomas J Herzog; Monjri Shah; Clarissa Bonanno; Sharyn N Lewin; Kirsten Cleary; Lynn L Simpson; Sreedhar Gaddipati; Xuming Sun; Mary E D'Alton; Patricia Devine
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Concordance between Individual vs. Area-Level Socioeconomic Measures in an Urban Setting.

Authors:  Nirmala P Narla; Maria R Pardo-Crespo; Timothy J Beebe; Jeff Sloan; Barbara Yawn; Arthur R Williams; Young J Juhn
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2015-11

3.  Examining Disparities in Route of Surgery and Postoperative Complications in Black Race and Hysterectomy.

Authors:  Amy L Alexander; Anna E Strohl; Stephanie Rieder; Jane Holl; Emma L Barber
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  Trends in Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy Rates Among Commercially Insured Women in the United States, 2000-2014.

Authors:  Kemi M Doll; Stacie B Dusetzina; Whitney Robinson
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 14.766

5.  Disparities in use of laparoscopic hysterectomies: a nationwide analysis.

Authors:  Pooja R Patel; Jinhyung Lee; Ana M Rodriguez; Mostafa A Borahay; Russell R Snyder; Gary D Hankins; Gokhan S Kilic
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Factors Impacting Use of Robotic Surgery for Treatment of Endometrial Cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Erin A Blake; Jeanelle Sheeder; Kian Behbakht; Saketh R Guntupalli; Michael S Guy
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in abdominal versus minimally invasive hysterectomy for benign conditions.

Authors:  Emma L Barber; Nikki L Neubauer; Dana R Gossett
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Utilization and outcomes of inpatient surgical care at critical access hospitals in the United States.

Authors:  Adam J Gadzinski; Justin B Dimick; Zaojun Ye; David C Miller
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 14.766

9.  The impact of different surgical modalities for hysterectomy on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes.

Authors:  Michael C Pitter; Christopher Simmonds; Usha Seshadri-Kreaden; Helen B Hubert
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2014-07-17

10.  Hospital level under-utilization of minimally invasive surgery in the United States: retrospective review.

Authors:  Michol A Cooper; Susan Hutfless; Dorry L Segev; Andrew Ibrahim; Heather Lyu; Martin A Makary
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-07-08
View more
  4 in total

1.  Predictors of the cost of hysterectomy for benign indications.

Authors:  Abdelrahman AlAshqar; Metin E Goktepe; Gokhan S Kilic; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-10-09

2.  Senhance Robotic Platform System for Gynecological Surgery.

Authors:  Steven D McCarus
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.172

3.  Predictors of Minimally Invasive Myomectomy in the National Inpatient Sample Database, 2010-2014.

Authors:  Anja S Frost; Meghan McMahon; Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith; Mostafa A Borahay; Kristin E Patzkowsky
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2021 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

Review 4.  Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Youssef Youssef; Huda Afaneh; Mostafa A Borahay
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2022 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.789

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.