Literature DB >> 33359176

Hospital variation in responses to safety warnings about power morcellation in hysterectomy.

Xiao Xu1, Vrunda B Desai2, Jason D Wright3, Haiqun Lin4, Peter E Schwartz5, Cary P Gross6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Safety warnings about power morcellation in 2014 considerably changed hysterectomy practice, especially for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy that typically requires morcellation to remove the corpus uteri while preserving the cervix. Hospitals might vary in how they respond to safety warnings and altered hysterectomy procedures to avoid use of power morcellation. However, there has been little data on how hospitals differ in their practice changes.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation and compare the risk of surgical complications at hospitals that had different response trajectories in use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of data from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System and the State Inpatient Databases and State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases from 14 other states. We identified women aged ≥18 years undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications in the hospital inpatient and outpatient settings from October 1, 2013 to September 30, 2015. We calculated a risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy for each hospital in each calendar quarter after accounting for patient clinical risk factors. Applying a growth mixture modeling approach, we identified distinct groups of hospitals that exhibited different trajectories of using laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy over time. Within each trajectory group, we compared patients' risk of surgical complications in the prewarning (2013Q4-2014Q1), transition (2014Q2-2014Q4), and postwarning (2015Q1-2015Q3) period using multivariable regressions.
RESULTS: Among 212,146 women undergoing benign hysterectomy at 511 hospitals, the use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy decreased from 15.1% in 2013Q4 to 6.2% in 2015Q3. The use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy at these 511 hospitals exhibited 4 distinct trajectory patterns: persistent low use (mean risk-adjusted utilization rate of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy changed from 2.8% in 2013Q4 to 0.6% in 2015Q3), decreased medium use (17.0% to 6.9%), decreased high use (51.4% to 24.2%), and rapid abandonment (30.5% to 0.8%). In the meantime, use of open abdominal hysterectomy increased by 2.1, 4.1, 7.8, and 11.8 percentage points between the prewarning and postwarning periods in these 4 trajectory groups, respectively. Compared with the prewarning period, the risk of major complications in the postwarning period decreased among patients at "persistent low use" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.81-0.94). In contrast, the risk of major complications increased among patients at "rapid abandonment" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.98), and the risk of minor complications increased among patients at "decreased high use" hospitals (adjusted odds ratio, 1.31; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.72).
CONCLUSION: Hospitals varied in their use of laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy after safety warnings about power morcellation. Complication risk increased at hospitals that shifted considerably toward open abdominal hysterectomy.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complication; hospital variation; hysterectomy; laparoscopic; power morcellation; trajectory

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33359176      PMCID: PMC8180513          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.12.1207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   10.693


  22 in total

1.  Association of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Morcellation Warning With Rates of Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy and Myomectomy.

Authors:  Kenneth I Barron; Tere Richard; Patricia S Robinson; Georgine Lamvu
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data.

Authors:  A Elixhauser; C Steiner; D R Harris; R M Coffey
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Route of hysterectomy and surgical outcomes from a statewide gynecologic oncology population: is there a role for vaginal hysterectomy?

Authors:  Tiffany L Beck; Christopher B Morse; Heidi J Gray; Barbara A Goff; Renata R Urban; John B Liao
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Trends in Use and Outcomes of Women Undergoing Hysterectomy With Electric Power Morcellation.

Authors:  Jason D Wright; Ling Chen; William M Burke; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; Cande V Ananth; Dawn L Hershman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016 Aug 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Timing of and Reasons for Unplanned 30-Day Readmission After Hysterectomy for Benign Disease.

Authors:  Courtney A Penn; Daniel M Morgan; Laurel W Rice; John A Harris; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Shitanshu Uppal
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Ranking Hospitals Based on Colon Surgery and Abdominal Hysterectomy Surgical Site Infection Outcomes: Impact of Limiting Surveillance to the Operative Hospital.

Authors:  Deborah S Yokoe; Taliser R Avery; Richard Platt; Ken Kleinman; Susan S Huang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Tissue Extraction Techniques During Laparoscopic Uterine Surgery.

Authors:  Nisse V Clark; Sarah L Cohen
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.137

8.  Hysterectomy Practice Patterns in the Postmorcellation Era.

Authors:  Elisa M Jorgensen; Anna M Modest; Hye-Chun Hur; Michele R Hacker; Christopher S Awtrey
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Variation in ovarian conservation in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign indications.

Authors:  Hemashi K Perera; Cande V Ananth; Catherine A Richards; Alfred I Neugut; Sharyn N Lewin; Yu-Shiang Lu; Thomas J Herzog; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide.

Authors:  Julia Adler-Milstein; A Jay Holmgren; Peter Kralovec; Chantal Worzala; Talisha Searcy; Vaishali Patel
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  1 in total

1.  Safety Warning about Laparoscopic Power Morcellation in Hysterectomy: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of National Impact.

Authors:  Xiao Xu; Vrunda B Desai; Peter E Schwartz; Cary P Gross; Haiqun Lin; Maria J Schymura; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle)       Date:  2022-03-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.