Literature DB >> 29606914

An introduction to Item Response Theory and Rasch Analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).

Jacob Kean1, Darrel S Brodke2, Joshua Biber1, Paul Gross1.   

Abstract

Item response theory has its origins in educational measurement and is now commonly applied in health-related measurement of latent traits, such as function and symptoms. This application is due in large part to gains in the precision of measurement attributable to item response theory and corresponding decreases in response burden, study costs, and study duration. The purpose of this paper is twofold: introduce basic concepts of item response theory and demonstrate this analytic approach in a worked example, a Rasch model (1PL) analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10), a commonly used measure for oropharyngeal dysphagia. The results of the analysis were largely concordant with previous studies of the EAT-10 and illustrate for brain impairment clinicians and researchers how IRT analysis can yield greater precision of measurement.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29606914      PMCID: PMC5875705          DOI: 10.1017/BrImp.2017.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Impair        ISSN: 1839-5252            Impact factor:   1.727


  8 in total

1.  Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

Authors:  R D Hays; L S Morales; S P Reise
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Controversy and the Rasch model: a characteristic of incompatible paradigms?

Authors:  David Andrich
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Classical test theory.

Authors:  Robert F DeVellis
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 4.  Pragmatic characteristics of patient-reported outcome measures are important for use in clinical practice.

Authors:  Kurt Kroenke; Patrick O Monahan; Jacob Kean
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-04-11       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) Using Rasch Analysis.

Authors:  R Cordier; A Joosten; P Clavé; A Schindler; M Bülow; N Demir; S Serel Arslan; R Speyer
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 3.438

6.  The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

Authors:  J F Fries; B Bruce; D Cella
Journal:  Clin Exp Rheumatol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.473

7.  Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey.

Authors:  Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Mick P Couper; Eleanor Singer; Peter A Ubel; Sonja Ziniel; Floyd J Fowler; Carrie A Levin; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Validity and reliability of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).

Authors:  Peter C Belafsky; Debbie A Mouadeb; Catherine J Rees; Jan C Pryor; Gregory N Postma; Jacqueline Allen; Rebecca J Leonard
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.547

  8 in total
  9 in total

1.  European white paper: oropharyngeal dysphagia in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Laura W J Baijens; Margaret Walshe; Leena-Maija Aaltonen; Christoph Arens; Reinie Cordier; Patrick Cras; Lise Crevier-Buchman; Chris Curtis; Wojciech Golusinski; Roganie Govender; Jesper Grau Eriksen; Kevin Hansen; Kate Heathcote; Markus M Hess; Sefik Hosal; Jens Peter Klussmann; C René Leemans; Denise MacCarthy; Beatrice Manduchi; Jean-Paul Marie; Reza Nouraei; Claire Parkes; Christina Pflug; Walmari Pilz; Julie Regan; Nathalie Rommel; Antonio Schindler; Annemie M W J Schols; Renee Speyer; Giovanni Succo; Irene Wessel; Anna C H Willemsen; Taner Yilmaz; Pere Clavé
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-12-19       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  A psychometric reevaluation of the TCU criminal thinking scales (CTS).

Authors:  Thomas B Sease; George Joe; Jennifer Pankow; Wayne E K Lehman; Kevin Knight
Journal:  J Offender Rehabil       Date:  2022-03-15

3.  Measuring the Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Psychometric Examination and Development of a Valid and Reliable Prospective Instrument.

Authors:  Jessica N Sanders; Jacob Kean; Chong Zhang; Angela P Presson; Bethany G Everett; David K Turok; Jenny A Higgins
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.937

4.  Item analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by the Rasch model: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional survey data obtained among community-dwelling elders.

Authors:  Tina Hansen; Annette Kjaersgaard
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.186

5.  Is Dysphagia Under Diagnosed or is Normal Swallowing More Variable than We Think? Reported Swallowing Problems in People Aged 18-65 Years.

Authors:  Paula Leslie; David G Smithard
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 6.  White Paper by the European Society for Swallowing Disorders: Screening and Non-instrumental Assessment for Dysphagia in Adults.

Authors:  Renée Speyer; Reinie Cordier; Daniele Farneti; Weslania Nascimento; Walmari Pilz; Eric Verin; Margaret Walshe; Virginie Woisard
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.438

7.  The ability of the eating assessment tool-10 to detect penetration and aspiration in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Ole Schlickewei; Julie Cläre Nienstedt; Ulrike Frank; Odette Fründt; Monika Pötter-Nerger; Christian Gerloff; Carsten Buhmann; Frank Müller; Susanne Lezius; Jana-Christiane Koseki; Christina Pflug
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Validation of the Toronto Empathy Questionnaire (TEQ) Among Medical Students in China: Analyses Using Three Psychometric Methods.

Authors:  Richard Huan Xu; Eliza Lai-Yi Wong; Sabrina Yu-Jun Lu; Ling-Ming Zhou; Jing-Hui Chang; Dong Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-28

9.  Using Classical Test Theory to Determine the Psychometric Properties of the Deglutition Handicap Index.

Authors:  Renée Speyer; Reinie Cordier; Clara Bouix; Yohan Gallois; Virginie Woisard
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.438

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.