Literature DB >> 20881157

Deficits and variations in patients' experience with making 9 common medical decisions: the DECISIONS survey.

Brian J Zikmund-Fisher1, Mick P Couper, Eleanor Singer, Peter A Ubel, Sonja Ziniel, Floyd J Fowler, Carrie A Levin, Angela Fagerlin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although many researchers have examined patient involvement and patient-provider interactions within specific clinical environments, no nationally representative data exist to characterize patient perceptions of decision making and patient-provider communications across multiple common medical decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To identify deficits and variations in the patient experience of making common medical decisions about initiation of prescription medications for hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, or depression; screening tests for colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer; and surgeries for knee or hip replacement, cataracts, or lower back pain, as well as to identify factors associated with patient confidence in the decisions.
SETTING: National sample of US adults identified by random-digit dialing.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey conducted from November 2006 to May 2007. PARTICIPANTS: Included 2473 English-speaking adults age 40 and older who reported undertaking 1 or more of the above 9 medical actions or discussing doing so with a health care provider within the past 2 years. MEASUREMENTS: Patients reported who initiated discussions and made the final decisions, how much discussion of pros and cons occurred, whether they were asked about their preferences, and their confidence that the decision "was the right one."
RESULTS: The proportion of patient-driven decisions varied significantly across decisions (range: blood pressure: 16% to knee/hip replacement: 48%). Most patients (78%-85%) reported that providers made a recommendation, and such recommendations generally favored taking medical action. Fewer patients reported that providers asked them about their preferences (range: colon cancer screening: 34% to knee/hip replacement: 80%) or discussed reasons not to take action (range: breast cancer screening: 20% to lower back surgery: 80%). Decision confidence was higher among patients who reported primarily making the decision themselves (odds ratio [OR] = 14.6, P < 0.001) or having been asked for their preference (OR = 1.32, P < 0.01) and was lower among patients whose patient-provider discussions included cons (OR = 0.74, P = 0.008). LIMITATIONS: Recall biases may affect patients' memories of their decision-making processes.
CONCLUSIONS: DECISIONS participants reported wide variations in the proportion of discussions that included a conversation about reasons not to take action or a conversation about patients' preferences about what they would like to do. These factors appear directly related to patients' confidence that the decision was "right."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20881157     DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10380466

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Decis Making        ISSN: 0272-989X            Impact factor:   2.583


  40 in total

1.  Impact of educational and patient decision aids on decisional conflict associated with total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sofia de Achaval; Liana Fraenkel; Robert J Volk; Vanessa Cox; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Primary Care Physicians' Support of Shared Decision Making for Different Cancer Screening Decisions.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Richard F Brown; Michael P Pignone; Scott Ratliff; L Aubree Shay
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.583

3.  The DECISIONS study: synopsis of evidence for shared decision-making and quality patient-provider communication.

Authors:  Molly Jean Ferguson
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making.

Authors:  Siobhan M Case; John O'Leary; Nancy Kim; Mary E Tinetti; Terri R Fried
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Examining the context and helpfulness of family companion contributions to older adults' primary care visits.

Authors:  Jennifer L Wolff; Yue Guan; Cynthia M Boyd; Judith Vick; Halima Amjad; David L Roth; Laura N Gitlin; Debra L Roter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-10-25

6.  Quality of life and prosthetic aortic valve selection in non-elderly adult patients.

Authors:  Nelleke M Korteland; Derya Top; Gerard J J M Borsboom; Jolien W Roos-Hesselink; Ad J J C Bogers; Johanna J M Takkenberg
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-02-25

Review 7.  Key Elements of Mammography Shared Decision-Making: a Scoping Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; Sarina B Schrager; Mary E Hitchcock; Amanda K Kane; Terry A Little; Helene E McDowell; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Strengthening the Learning Health System in Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: Time to Leverage Big Data and Digital Solutions.

Authors:  Anjali A Wagle; Nino Isakadze; Khurram Nasir; Seth Shay Martin
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.113

9.  Is "Active Surveillance" an Acceptable Alternative?: A Qualitative Study of Couples' Decision Making about Early-Stage, Localized Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yen-Chi L Le; Stephanie L McFall; Theresa L Byrd; Robert J Volk; Scott B Cantor; Deborah A Kuban; Patricia Dolan Mullen
Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth       Date:  2016

10.  Prospective Evaluation of a 12-Gene Assay on Patient Treatment Decisions and Physician Confidence in Mismatch Repair Proficient Stage IIA Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Lindsay A Renfro; Nan Zhang; Margarita Lopatin; Calvin Chao; Steven R Alberts
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 4.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.