Literature DB >> 10982088

Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century.

R D Hays1, L S Morales, S P Reise.   

Abstract

Item response theory (IRT) has a number of potential advantages over classical test theory in assessing self-reported health outcomes. IRT models yield invariant item and latent trait estimates (within a linear transformation), standard errors conditional on trait level, and trait estimates anchored to item content. IRT also facilitates evaluation of differential item functioning, inclusion of items with different response formats in the same scale, and assessment of person fit and is ideally suited for implementing computer adaptive testing. Finally, IRT methods can be helpful in developing better health outcome measures and in assessing change over time. These issues are reviewed, along with a discussion of some of the methodological and practical challenges in applying IRT methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10982088      PMCID: PMC1815384          DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  16 in total

1.  Evaluating the equivalence of health care ratings by whites and Hispanics.

Authors:  L S Morales; S P Reise; R D Hays
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Interpretation of quality-of-life outcomes: issues that affect magnitude and meaning.

Authors:  M A Testa
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 3.  Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II.

Authors:  G Samsa; D Edelman; M L Rothman; G R Williams; J Lipscomb; D Matchar
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Performance of the SF-36, SF-12, and RAND-36 summary scales in a multiple sclerosis population.

Authors:  M W Nortvedt; T Riise; K M Myhr; H I Nyland
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability.

Authors:  L GUTTMAN
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1945       Impact factor: 2.500

6.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.

Authors:  R B Cattell
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1966-04-01       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Goodness of Fit in Item Response Models.

Authors:  R P McDonald; M M Mok
Journal:  Multivariate Behav Res       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Quality of life measures in epilepsy: how well can they detect change over time?

Authors:  G L Birbeck; S Kim; R D Hays; B G Vickrey
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-05-09       Impact factor: 9.910

10.  Variations in the care of HIV-infected adults in the United States: results from the HIV Cost and Services Utilization Study.

Authors:  M F Shapiro; S C Morton; D F McCaffrey; J W Senterfitt; J A Fleishman; J F Perlman; L A Athey; J W Keesey; D P Goldman; S H Berry; S A Bozzette
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Jun 23-30       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  223 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Brief Survey Instrument for Assessing Subtle Differences in Cognitive Function Among Older Adults.

Authors:  Ashwin A Kotwal; Philip Schumm; David W Kern; Martha K McClintock; Linda J Waite; Joseph W Shega; Megan J Huisingh-Scheetz; William Dale
Journal:  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.703

2.  Reliability and validity of the SF-36 in HIV-infected homeless and marginally housed individuals.

Authors:  E D Riley; D R Bangsberg; S Perry; R A Clark; A R Moss; A W Wu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick; J M Norquist; C Jenkinson; B C Reeves; R W Morris; D W Murray; P J Gregg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Development of the computer-adaptive version of the Late-Life Function and Disability Instrument.

Authors:  Christine M McDonough; Feng Tian; Pengsheng Ni; Ilona M Kopits; Richard Moed; Poonam K Pardasaney; Alan M Jette
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Revising the Cannabis Use Disorders Identification Test (CUDIT) by means of Item Response Theory.

Authors:  Beatrice Annaheim; Thomas J Scotto; Gerhard Gmel
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.035

6.  Item response theory analysis of DSM-IV criteria for inhalant-use disorders in adolescents.

Authors:  Brian E Perron; Michael G Vaughn; Matthew O Howard; Amy Bohnert; Erick Guerrero
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.582

7.  Racial/ethnic differences in responses to the everyday discrimination scale: a differential item functioning analysis.

Authors:  Tené T Lewis; Frances M Yang; Elizabeth A Jacobs; George Fitchett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Development and testing of item response theory-based item banks and short forms for eye, skin and lung problems in sarcoidosis.

Authors:  David E Victorson; Seung Choi; Marc A Judson; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  An item response theory analysis of the sexual compulsivity scale and its correspondence with the hypersexual disorder screening inventory among a sample of highly sexually active gay and bisexual men.

Authors:  Ana Ventuneac; H Jonathon Rendina; Christian Grov; Brian Mustanski; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Psychometric assessment of health-related quality of life and symptom experience in HIV patients treated with antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Christophe Lalanne; Andrew R Armstrong; Susan Herrmann; Sophie Le Coeur; Patrizia Carrieri; Olivier Chassany; Martin Duracinsky
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-12-07       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.