Literature DB >> 35386231

A psychometric reevaluation of the TCU criminal thinking scales (CTS).

Thomas B Sease1, George Joe1, Jennifer Pankow1, Wayne E K Lehman1, Kevin Knight1.   

Abstract

In the United States, approximately 9 million people cycle in and out of jail and more than 600,000 people are released from prison each year. Unfortunately, the reentry process includes several barriers people must overcome (e.g., criminal thinking) to achieve adequate psychosocial functioning. As such, valid and reliable assessments that allow correctional staff to monitor clients' progress in treatment and test program effectiveness are paramount to reducing this major public safety concern. The TCU Criminal Thinking Scales (CTS) are a widely used assessment of criminal thinking in correctional settings. This study reevaluated the psychometric properties of the TCU CTS using Item Response Theory. Results showed the TCU CTS had good internal reliability and each scale loaded onto one factor. Item level analysis revealed most items adequately fit the model, generally measuring moderate levels of criminal thinking. Furthermore, several TCU CTS scales were negatively correlated with motivation for treatment and psychosocial functioning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; criminal justice system; criminal thinking; evaluation; measurement

Year:  2022        PMID: 35386231      PMCID: PMC8983012          DOI: 10.1080/10509674.2022.2045528

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Offender Rehabil        ISSN: 1050-9674


  12 in total

1.  Treatment readiness training and probationers' evaluation of substance abuse treatment in a criminal justice setting.

Authors:  T L Sia; D F Dansereau; M L Czuchry
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2000-12

2.  Relationship between drug treatment engagement and criminal thinking style among drug-using offenders.

Authors:  David Best; Ed Day; Angela Campbell; Patrick M Flynn; D Dwayne Simpson
Journal:  Eur Addict Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Effectiveness of a self-administered intervention for criminal thinking: Taking a Chance on Change.

Authors:  Johanna B Folk; David J Disabato; Jordan M Daylor; June P Tangney; Sharen Barboza; John S Wilson; Lynda Bonieskie; James Holwager
Journal:  Psychol Serv       Date:  2016-05-30

4.  Effect of a brief cognitive behavioural intervention on criminal thinking and prison misconduct in male inmates: Variable-oriented and person-oriented analyses.

Authors:  Glenn D Walters
Journal:  Crim Behav Ment Health       Date:  2017-06-07

5.  A longitudinal evaluation of treatment engagement and recovery stages.

Authors:  D Dwayne Simpson; George W Joe
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2004-09

6.  An introduction to Item Response Theory and Rasch Analysis of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10).

Authors:  Jacob Kean; Darrel S Brodke; Joshua Biber; Paul Gross
Journal:  Brain Impair       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.727

7.  Effects of readiness for drug abuse treatment on client retention and assessment of process.

Authors:  G W Joe; D D Simpson; K M Broome
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 8.  The Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS): a review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Glenn D Walters
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2002-09

9.  Examining Concurrent Validity and Predictive Utility for the Addiction Severity Index and Texas Christian University (TCU) Short Forms.

Authors:  Jennifer Pankow; D Dwayne Simpson; George W Joe; Grace A Rowan-Szal; Kevin Knight; Paul Meason
Journal:  J Offender Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-07

10.  Antisocial personality disorder as a predictor of criminal behaviour in a longitudinal study of a cohort of abusers of several classes of drugs: relation to type of substance and type of crime.

Authors:  Mats Fridell; Morten Hesse; Mads Meier Jaeger; Eckart Kühlhorn
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2008-01-12       Impact factor: 3.913

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.