Literature DB >> 11303929

Acoustic and linguistic factors in the perception of bandpass-filtered speech.

G S Stickney1, P F Assmann.   

Abstract

Speech can remain intelligible for listeners with normal hearing when processed by narrow bandpass filters that transmit only a small fraction of the audible spectrum. Two experiments investigated the basis for the high intelligibility of narrowband speech. Experiment 1 confirmed reports that everyday English sentences can be recognized accurately (82%-98% words correct) when filtered at center frequencies of 1500, 2100, and 3000 Hz. However, narrowband low predictability (LP) sentences were less accurately recognized than high predictability (HP) sentences (20% lower scores), and excised narrowband words were even less intelligible than LP sentences (a further 23% drop). While experiment 1 revealed similar levels of performance for narrowband and broadband sentences at conversational speech levels, experiment 2 showed that speech reception thresholds were substantially (>30 dB) poorer for narrowband sentences. One explanation for this increased disparity between narrowband and broadband speech at threshold (compared to conversational speech levels) is that spectral components in the sloping transition bands of the filters provide important cues for the recognition of narrowband speech, but these components become inaudible as the signal level is reduced. Experiment 2 also showed that performance was degraded by the introduction of a speech masker (a single competing talker). The elevation in threshold was similar for narrowband and broadband speech (11 dB, on average), but because the narrowband sentences required considerably higher sound levels to reach their thresholds in quiet compared to broadband sentences, their target-to-masker ratios were very different (+23 dB for narrowband sentences and -12 dB for broadband sentences). As in experiment 1, performance was better for HP than LP sentences. The LP-HP difference was larger for narrowband than broadband sentences, suggesting that context provides greater benefits when speech is distorted by narrow bandpass filtering.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11303929     DOI: 10.1121/1.1340643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  9 in total

1.  Effects of simulated spectral holes on speech intelligibility and spatial release from masking under binaural and monaural listening.

Authors:  Soha N Garadat; Ruth Y Litovsky; Gongqiang Yu; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Speech-cue transmission by an algorithm to increase consonant recognition in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Yuxuan Wang; Frédéric Apoux; DeLiang Wang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: behavioural and neural interactions.

Authors:  Carolyn McGettigan; Andrew Faulkner; Irene Altarelli; Jonas Obleser; Harriet Baverstock; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  Speech-material and talker effects in speech band importance.

Authors:  Sarah E Yoho; Eric W Healy; Carla L Youngdahl; Tyson S Barrett; Frédéric Apoux
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  List Equivalency of PRESTO for the Evaluation of Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Kathleen F Faulkner; Terrin N Tamati; Jaimie L Gilbert; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Richard J S Wise; M Alex Dresner; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Weighting of Prosodic and Lexical-Semantic Cues for Emotion Identification in Spectrally Degraded Speech and With Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Margaret E Richter; Monita Chatterjee
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Nov-Dec 01       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Are the products of statistical learning abstract or stimulus-specific?

Authors:  Athena Vouloumanos; Patricia E Brosseau-Liard; Evan Balaban; Alanna D Hager
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-23

9.  Acoustic Detail But Not Predictability of Task-Irrelevant Speech Disrupts Working Memory.

Authors:  Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.