Literature DB >> 29588754

Evidence-based Management of Cardiogenic Shock After Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Karl Werdan1, Martin Russ2, Michael Buerke3, Roland Prondzinsky4, Sebastian Dietz1.   

Abstract

Guidelines for evidence-based management of patients with cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction focuses on early revascularisation of the occluded coronary artery as well as on support of cardiac failure and improvement of impaired organ perfusion. Also of great importance is effective treatment of shock complications, especially acute respiratory failure and other forms of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS). Cardiovascular therapy has to be accompanied by best general intensive care of these critically ill patients with high mortality. Most lives can be saved by early revascularisation, and this class I recommendation has a high level of evidence. So far, most of the other guideline recommendations are of low evidence level, in most cases based on expert opinions. Recently, the Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP SHOCK II) trial with 600 patients has shown that adjunctive IABP therapy - for long a class I recommendation - does not reduce 30-day and six-month motality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiogenic shock; German-Austrian cardiogenic shock guideline; IABP SHOCK II trial; blood glucose; dobutamine; guideline; lung protective ventilation; multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; myocardial infarction; norepinephrine; percutaneous coronary intervention

Year:  2013        PMID: 29588754      PMCID: PMC5808586          DOI: 10.15420/icr.2013.8.2.73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 1756-1485


  47 in total

Review 1.  Cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: expanding the paradigm.

Authors:  Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-24       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Do not get in RAGE in cardiogenic shock: it is detrimental!

Authors:  Karl Werdan
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Randomized, double-blind comparison of immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension versus intravenous cimetidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Steven A Conrad; Andrea Gabrielli; Benjamin Margolis; Andrew Quartin; J Steven Hata; William O Frank; Robert G Bagin; James A Rock; Bonnie Hepburn; Loren Laine
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Jiunn-Jye Sheu; Tzu-Hsien Tsai; Fan-Yen Lee; Hsiu-Yu Fang; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Steve Leu; Cheng-Hsu Yang; Shyh-Ming Chen; Chi-Ling Hang; Yuan-Kai Hsieh; Chien-Jen Chen; Chiung-Jen Wu; Hon-Kan Yip
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock.

Authors:  Daniel De Backer; Patrick Biston; Jacques Devriendt; Christian Madl; Didier Chochrad; Cesar Aldecoa; Alexandre Brasseur; Pierre Defrance; Philippe Gottignies; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-03-04       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Long-term results after acute percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Peter Ammann; Edwin Straumann; Barbara Naegeli; Ernst Schuiki; Jürgen Frielingsdorf; Andreas Gerber; Osmund Bertel
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Functional status and quality of life after emergency revascularization for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Lynn A Sleeper; Krishnan Ramanathan; Michael H Picard; Thierry H Lejemtel; Harvey D White; Vladimir Dzavik; Deborah Tormey; Nancy E Avis; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2005-07-19       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 9.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices vs. intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation for treatment of cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Authors:  Jin M Cheng; Corstiaan A den Uil; Sanne E Hoeks; Martin van der Ent; Lucia S D Jewbali; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Levosimendan vs. dobutamine: outcomes for acute heart failure patients on beta-blockers in SURVIVE.

Authors:  Alexandre Mebazaa; Markku S Nieminen; Gerasimos S Filippatos; John G Cleland; Jeffrey E Salon; Roopal Thakkar; Robert J Padley; Bidan Huang; Alain Cohen-Solal
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 15.534

View more
  1 in total

1.  No-Reflow after PPCI-A Predictor of Short-Term Outcomes in STEMI Patients.

Authors:  Larisa Renata Pantea-Roșan; Vlad Alin Pantea; Simona Bungau; Delia Mirela Tit; Tapan Behl; Cosmin Mihai Vesa; Cristiana Bustea; Radu Dumitru Moleriu; Marius Rus; Mircea Ioachim Popescu; Vladiana Turi; Camelia Cristina Diaconu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.241

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.