AIMS: Many chronic heart failure (CHF) patients take beta-blockers. When such patients are hospitalized for decompensation, it remains unclear how ongoing beta-blocker treatment will affect outcomes of acute inotrope therapy. We aimed to assess outcomes of SURVIVE patients who were on beta-blocker therapy before receiving a single intravenous infusion oflevosimendan or dobutamine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cox proportional hazard regression revealed all-cause mortality benefits of levosimendan treatment over dobutamine when the SURVIVE population was stratified according to baseline presence/absence of CHF history and use/non-use of beta-blocker treatment at baseline. All-cause mortality was lower in the CHF/levosimendan group than in the CHF/dobutamine group, showing treatment differences by hazard ratio (HR) at days 5 (3.4 vs. 5.8%; HR, 0.58, CI 0.33-1.01, P = 0.05) and 14 (7.0 vs. 10.3%; HR, 0.67, CI 0.45-0.99, P = 0.045). For patients who used beta-blockers (n = 669), mortality was significantly lower for levosimendan than dobutamine at day 5 (1.5 vs. 5.1% deaths; HR, 0.29; CI 0.11-0.78, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION:Levosimendan may be better than dobutamine for treating patients with a history of CHF or those on beta-blocker therapy when they are hospitalized with acute decompensations. These findings are preliminary but important for planning future studies.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Many chronic heart failure (CHF) patients take beta-blockers. When such patients are hospitalized for decompensation, it remains unclear how ongoing beta-blocker treatment will affect outcomes of acute inotrope therapy. We aimed to assess outcomes of SURVIVE patients who were on beta-blocker therapy before receiving a single intravenous infusion of levosimendan or dobutamine. METHODS AND RESULTS: Cox proportional hazard regression revealed all-cause mortality benefits of levosimendan treatment over dobutamine when the SURVIVE population was stratified according to baseline presence/absence of CHF history and use/non-use of beta-blocker treatment at baseline. All-cause mortality was lower in the CHF/levosimendan group than in the CHF/dobutamine group, showing treatment differences by hazard ratio (HR) at days 5 (3.4 vs. 5.8%; HR, 0.58, CI 0.33-1.01, P = 0.05) and 14 (7.0 vs. 10.3%; HR, 0.67, CI 0.45-0.99, P = 0.045). For patients who used beta-blockers (n = 669), mortality was significantly lower for levosimendan than dobutamine at day 5 (1.5 vs. 5.1% deaths; HR, 0.29; CI 0.11-0.78, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION:Levosimendan may be better than dobutamine for treating patients with a history of CHF or those on beta-blocker therapy when they are hospitalized with acute decompensations. These findings are preliminary but important for planning future studies.
Authors: Marco Metra; Savina Nodari; Antonio D'Aloia; Claudio Muneretto; Alastair D Robertson; Michael R Bristow; Livio Dei Cas Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-10-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: M R Bristow; E M Gilbert; W T Abraham; K F Adams; M B Fowler; R E Hershberger; S H Kubo; K A Narahara; H Ingersoll; S Krueger; S Young; N Shusterman Journal: Circulation Date: 1996-12-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Philip A Poole-Wilson; Karl Swedberg; John G F Cleland; Andrea Di Lenarda; Peter Hanrath; Michel Komajda; Jacobus Lubsen; Beatrix Lutiger; Marco Metra; Willem J Remme; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Armin Scherhag; Allan Skene Journal: Lancet Date: 2003-07-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: F Follath; J G F Cleland; H Just; J G Y Papp; H Scholz; K Peuhkurinen; V P Harjola; V Mitrovic; M Abdalla; E-P Sandell; L Lehtonen Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-07-20 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Marco Metra; Luca Bettari; Valentina Carubelli; Silvia Bugatti; Alessandra Dei Cas; Francesca Del Magro; Valentina Lazzarini; Carlo Lombardi; Livio Dei Cas Journal: Drugs Date: 2011-03-26 Impact factor: 9.546
Authors: Geert Koster; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Jan G Zijlstra; Thomas W L Scheeren; Iwan C C van der Horst; Frederik Keus Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Simona Silvetti; Teresa Greco; Ambra Licia Di Prima; Marta Mucchetti; Castro Maria de Lurdes; Laura Pasin; Mara Scandroglio; Giovanni Landoni; Alberto Zangrillo Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-12-25 Impact factor: 5.460