Literature DB >> 15818102

Randomized, double-blind comparison of immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension versus intravenous cimetidine for the prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients.

Steven A Conrad1, Andrea Gabrielli, Benjamin Margolis, Andrew Quartin, J Steven Hata, William O Frank, Robert G Bagin, James A Rock, Bonnie Hepburn, Loren Laine.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate that a new immediate-release omeprazole oral suspension is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients.
DESIGN: A noninferiority analysis was used to compare rates of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a prospective, phase 3, double-blind trial with parallel omeprazole suspension and cimetidine treatment groups.
SETTING: A total of 47 intensive care units in the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 359 critically ill patients who required mechanical ventilation for > or =48 hrs, had an Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score of > or =11 at baseline, had an intact stomach with a nasogastric or orogastric tube in place, and had at least one additional risk factor for upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to treatment with omeprazole suspension (two 40-mg doses on day 1, via orogastric or nasogastric tube, and 40 mg each day thereafter) or intravenous cimetidine (300-mg bolus and 50 mg/hr thereafter) for up to 14 days. Gastric aspirates were sampled for bleeding and pH. Medication doses were doubled for failure of pH control (two successive aspirates with pH < or = 4).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding (bright red blood not clearing after 5-10 mins of lavage or persistent Gastroccult-positive "coffee-grounds" material for 8 hrs on days 1-2 or for 2-4 hrs on days 3-14 and not clearing with > or =100 mL of lavage) was the primary end point of the trial. The rate of clinically significant bleeding in the per-protocol population was 4.5% with omeprazole suspension and 6.8% with cimetidine, meeting the criteria for the noninferiority of omeprazole suspension. Median gastric pH was > or =6 on all trial days with omeprazole suspension treatment and on 50% of days with cimetidine treatment (p < .001, all trial days). In the omeprazole suspension group, median gastric pH was >4 on each trial day in 95% of patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Immediate-release omeprazole suspension is effective in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding and more effective than intravenous cimetidine in maintaining gastric pH of >4 in critically ill patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15818102     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000157751.92249.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  36 in total

1.  Prediction and prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding after cardiac surgery: a case control study.

Authors:  Mamatha Bhat; Martin Larocque; Marcos Amorim; Karl Herba; Myriam Martel; Benoît De Varennes; Alan Barkun
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Overutilization of proton-pump inhibitors: what the clinician needs to know.

Authors:  Joel J Heidelbaugh; Andrea H Kim; Robert Chang; Paul C Walker
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.409

3.  Grand rounds in gastroenterology from Baylor College of Medicine. Upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the ICU.

Authors:  Aaron Woofter; Richard Goodgame
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2006-08-02

4.  Stress ulcer bleeding.

Authors:  Richard F Harty; Hari B Ancha
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04

5.  Linking joint commission inpatient core measures and national patient safety goals with evidence.

Authors:  Andrew L Masica; Kathleen M Richter; Paul Convery; Ziad Haydar
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2009-04

Review 6.  [Ventilator-associated pneumonia].

Authors:  R Dembinski; R Rossaint
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Early acute management in adults with spinal cord injury: a clinical practice guideline for health-care professionals.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 8.  Stress ulceration: prevalence, pathology and association with adverse outcomes.

Authors:  Mark P Plummer; Annika Reintam Blaser; Adam M Deane
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 9.097

9.  Recommendations for the transfusion management of patients in the peri-operative period. III. The post-operative period.

Authors:  Giancarlo Maria Liumbruno; Francesco Bennardello; Angela Lattanzio; Pierluigi Piccoli; Gina Rossetti
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 3.443

10.  Prevention, diagnosis, therapy and follow-up care of sepsis: 1st revision of S-2k guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (Deutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft e.V. (DSG)) and the German Interdisciplinary Association of Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine (Deutsche Interdisziplinäre Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI)).

Authors:  K Reinhart; F M Brunkhorst; H-G Bone; J Bardutzky; C-E Dempfle; H Forst; P Gastmeier; H Gerlach; M Gründling; S John; W Kern; G Kreymann; W Krüger; P Kujath; G Marggraf; J Martin; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; M Oppert; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; H Seifert; C Spies; F Stüber; N Weiler; A Weimann; K Werdan; T Welte
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2010-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.