Literature DB >> 20200382

Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock.

Daniel De Backer1, Patrick Biston, Jacques Devriendt, Christian Madl, Didier Chochrad, Cesar Aldecoa, Alexandre Brasseur, Pierre Defrance, Philippe Gottignies, Jean-Louis Vincent.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Both dopamine and norepinephrine are recommended as first-line vasopressor agents in the treatment of shock. There is a continuing controversy about whether one agent is superior to the other.
METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned patients with shock to receive either dopamine or norepinephrine as first-line vasopressor therapy to restore and maintain blood pressure. When blood pressure could not be maintained with a dose of 20 microg per kilogram of body weight per minute for dopamine or a dose of 0.19 microg per kilogram per minute for norepinephrine, open-label norepinephrine, epinephrine, or vasopressin could be added. The primary outcome was the rate of death at 28 days after randomization; secondary end points included the number of days without need for organ support and the occurrence of adverse events.
RESULTS: The trial included 1679 patients, of whom 858 were assigned to dopamine and 821 to norepinephrine. The baseline characteristics of the groups were similar. There was no significant between-group difference in the rate of death at 28 days (52.5% in the dopamine group and 48.5% in the norepinephrine group; odds ratio with dopamine, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.97 to 1.42; P=0.10). However, there were more arrhythmic events among the patients treated with dopamine than among those treated with norepinephrine (207 events [24.1%] vs. 102 events [12.4%], P<0.001). A subgroup analysis showed that dopamine, as compared with norepinephrine, was associated with an increased rate of death at 28 days among the 280 patients with cardiogenic shock but not among the 1044 patients with septic shock or the 263 with hypovolemic shock (P=0.03 for cardiogenic shock, P=0.19 for septic shock, and P=0.84 for hypovolemic shock, in Kaplan-Meier analyses).
CONCLUSIONS: Although there was no significant difference in the rate of death between patients with shock who were treated with dopamine as the first-line vasopressor agent and those who were treated with norepinephrine, the use of dopamine was associated with a greater number of adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00314704.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20200382     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  335 in total

1.  Dopamine stabilizes tumor blood vessels by up-regulating angiopoietin 1 expression in pericytes and Kruppel-like factor-2 expression in tumor endothelial cells.

Authors:  Debanjan Chakroborty; Chandrani Sarkar; Hongmei Yu; Jiang Wang; Zhongfa Liu; Partha Sarathi Dasgupta; Sujit Basu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Inotropes and vasopressors: more than haemodynamics!

Authors:  Hendrik Bracht; Enrico Calzia; Michael Georgieff; Joel Singer; Peter Radermacher; James A Russell
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Advances in the management of sepsis and the understanding of key immunologic defects.

Authors:  Lee P Skrupky; Paul W Kerby; Richard S Hotchkiss
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Optimization of the mean arterial pressure and timing of surgical decompression in traumatic spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.

Authors:  A Dakson; D Brandman; G Thibault-Halman; S D Christie
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 7.  Challenges with Diagnosing and Managing Sepsis in Older Adults.

Authors:  Kalin M Clifford; Eliza A Dy-Boarman; Krystal K Haase; Kristen Maxvill; Steven E Pass; Carlos A Alvarez
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Physicians declining patient enrollment in a critical care trial: a case study in thromboprophylaxis.

Authors:  D Cook; Y Arabi; N Ferguson; D Heels-Ansdell; A Freitag; E McDonald; F Clarke; S Keenan; G Pagliarello; W Plaxton; M Herridge; T Karachi; S Vallance; J Cade; T Crozier; S Alves da Silva; R Costa Filho; N Brandao; I Watpool; T McArdle; G Hollinger; Y Mandourah; M Al-Hazmi; N Zytaruk; N K J Adhikari
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Dopamine versus noradrenaline in septic shock.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Oziemski Peter
Journal:  Australas Med J       Date:  2011-10-31

Review 10.  Organ dysfunction, injury and failure in acute heart failure: from pathophysiology to diagnosis and management. A review on behalf of the Acute Heart Failure Committee of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).

Authors:  Veli-Pekka Harjola; Wilfried Mullens; Marek Banaszewski; Johann Bauersachs; Hans-Peter Brunner-La Rocca; Ovidiu Chioncel; Sean P Collins; Wolfram Doehner; Gerasimos S Filippatos; Andreas J Flammer; Valentin Fuhrmann; Mitja Lainscak; Johan Lassus; Matthieu Legrand; Josep Masip; Christian Mueller; Zoltán Papp; John Parissis; Elke Platz; Alain Rudiger; Frank Ruschitzka; Andreas Schäfer; Petar M Seferovic; Hadi Skouri; Mehmet Birhan Yilmaz; Alexandre Mebazaa
Journal:  Eur J Heart Fail       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 15.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.