Literature DB >> 23867282

Automatic knee cartilage segmentation from multi-contrast MR images using support vector machine classification with spatial dependencies.

Kunlei Zhang1, Wenmiao Lu, Pina Marziliano.   

Abstract

Accurate segmentation of knee cartilage is required to obtain quantitative cartilage measurements, which is crucial for the assessment of knee pathology caused by musculoskeletal diseases or sudden injuries. This paper presents an automatic knee cartilage segmentation technique which exploits a rich set of image features from multi-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) images and the spatial dependencies between neighbouring voxels. The image features and the spatial dependencies are modelled into a support vector machine (SVM)-based association potential and a discriminative random field (DRF)-based interaction potential. Subsequently, both potentials are incorporated into an inference graphical model such that the knee cartilage segmentation is cast into an optimal labelling problem which can be efficiently solved by loopy belief propagation. The effectiveness of the proposed technique is validated on a database of multi-contrast MR images. The experimental results show that using diverse forms of image and anatomical structure information as the features are helpful in improving the segmentation, and the joint SVM-DRF model is superior to the classification models based solely on DRF or SVM in terms of accuracy when the same features are used. The developed segmentation technique achieves good performance compared with gold standard segmentations and obtained higher average DSC values than the state-of-the-art automatic cartilage segmentation studies.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discriminative random field (DRF); Knee cartilage; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Multi-contrast Segmentation; Support vector machine (SVM)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23867282     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2013.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  13 in total

Review 1.  Segmentation of joint and musculoskeletal tissue in the study of arthritis.

Authors:  Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar; Thomas M Link
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Automatic segmentation of high- and low-field knee MRIs using knee image quantification with data from the osteoarthritis initiative.

Authors:  Erik B Dam; Martin Lillholm; Joselene Marques; Mads Nielsen
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-04-20

3.  Shape-based acetabular cartilage segmentation: application to CT and MRI datasets.

Authors:  Pooneh R Tabrizi; Reza A Zoroofi; Futoshi Yokota; Takashi Nishii; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Fully automated patellofemoral MRI segmentation using holistically nested networks: Implications for evaluating patellofemoral osteoarthritis, pain, injury, pathology, and adolescent development.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Natalia A Alexandridi; Richard M Smith; Aricia Shen; William Gandler; Evan McCreedy; Matthew J McAuliffe; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-08-11       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Learning-Based Cost Functions for 3-D and 4-D Multi-Surface Multi-Object Segmentation of Knee MRI: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  Satyananda Kashyap; Honghai Zhang; Karan Rao; Milan Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Acetabular cartilage segmentation in CT arthrography based on a bone-normalized probabilistic atlas.

Authors:  Pooneh R Tabrizi; Reza A Zoroofi; Futoshi Yokota; Satoru Tamura; Takashi Nishii; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 2.924

7.  Use of 2D U-Net Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Cartilage and Meniscus Segmentation of Knee MR Imaging Data to Determine Relaxometry and Morphometry.

Authors:  Berk Norman; Valentina Pedoia; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Pressure ulcer image segmentation technique through synthetic frequencies generation and contrast variation using toroidal geometry.

Authors:  Ortiz P David; Daniel Sierra-Sosa; Begoña García Zapirain
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.819

Review 9.  Machine Learning in Orthopedics: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Federico Cabitza; Angela Locoro; Giuseppe Banfi
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-06-27

10.  pyKNEEr: An image analysis workflow for open and reproducible research on femoral knee cartilage.

Authors:  Serena Bonaretti; Garry E Gold; Gary S Beaupre
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.