Alejandro Morales Martinez1,2,3, Francesco Caliva1, Io Flament1, Felix Liu4, Jinhee Lee1, Peng Cao5, Rutwik Shah1, Sharmila Majumdar1,2,3, Valentina Pedoia1,2,3,6. 1. Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California. 2. Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, San Francisco, California. 3. Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, California. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California. 5. Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The Hong Kong University, Hong Kong, China. 6. Center for Digital Health Innovation (CDHI), University of California, San Francisco, California.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To learn bone shape features from spherical bone map of knee MRI images using established convolutional neural networks (CNN) and use these features to diagnose and predict osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A bone segmentation model was trained on 25 manually annotated 3D MRI volumes to segment the femur, tibia, and patella from 47 078 3D MRI volumes. Each bone segmentation was converted to a 3D point cloud and transformed into spherical coordinates. Different fusion strategies were performed to merge spherical maps obtained by each bone. A total of 41 822 merged spherical maps with corresponding Kellgren-Lawrence grades for radiographic OA were used to train a CNN classifier model to diagnose OA using bone shape learned features. Several OA Diagnosis models were tested and the weights for each trained model were transferred to the OA Incidence models. The OA incidence task consisted of predicting OA from a healthy scan within a range of eight time points, from 1 y to 8 y. The validation performance was compared and the test set performance was reported. RESULTS: The OA Diagnosis model had an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.905 on the test set with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.815 and 0.839. The OA Incidence models had an AUC ranging from 0.841 to 0.646 on the test set for the range from 1 y to 8 y. CONCLUSION: Bone shape was successfully used as a predictive imaging biomarker for OA. This approach is novel in the field of deep learning applications for musculoskeletal imaging and can be expanded to other OA biomarkers.
PURPOSE: To learn bone shape features from spherical bone map of knee MRI images using established convolutional neural networks (CNN) and use these features to diagnose and predict osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: A bone segmentation model was trained on 25 manually annotated 3D MRI volumes to segment the femur, tibia, and patella from 47 078 3D MRI volumes. Each bone segmentation was converted to a 3D point cloud and transformed into spherical coordinates. Different fusion strategies were performed to merge spherical maps obtained by each bone. A total of 41 822 merged spherical maps with corresponding Kellgren-Lawrence grades for radiographic OA were used to train a CNN classifier model to diagnose OA using bone shape learned features. Several OA Diagnosis models were tested and the weights for each trained model were transferred to the OA Incidence models. The OA incidence task consisted of predicting OA from a healthy scan within a range of eight time points, from 1 y to 8 y. The validation performance was compared and the test set performance was reported. RESULTS: The OA Diagnosis model had an area-under-the-curve (AUC) of 0.905 on the test set with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.815 and 0.839. The OA Incidence models had an AUC ranging from 0.841 to 0.646 on the test set for the range from 1 y to 8 y. CONCLUSION: Bone shape was successfully used as a predictive imaging biomarker for OA. This approach is novel in the field of deep learning applications for musculoskeletal imaging and can be expanded to other OA biomarkers.
Authors: Miriam G Cisternas; Louise Murphy; Jeffrey J Sacks; Daniel H Solomon; David J Pasta; Charles G Helmick Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 4.794
Authors: Tuhina Neogi; Michael A Bowes; Jingbo Niu; Kevin M De Souza; Graham R Vincent; Joyce Goggins; Yuqing Zhang; David T Felson Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2013-08
Authors: Michiel Kallenberg; Kersten Petersen; Mads Nielsen; Andrew Y Ng; Christian Igel; Celine M Vachon; Katharina Holland; Rikke Rass Winkel; Nico Karssemeijer; Martin Lillholm Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Julie C Baker-Lepain; John A Lynch; Neeta Parimi; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; Maripat Corr; Nancy E Lane Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2012-05
Authors: Akshay S Chaudhari; Zhongnan Fang; Feliks Kogan; Jeff Wood; Kathryn J Stevens; Eric K Gibbons; Jin Hyung Lee; Garry E Gold; Brian A Hargreaves Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-03-26 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Gary H Chang; Lisa K Park; Nina A Le; Ray S Jhun; Tejus Surendran; Joseph Lai; Hojoon Seo; Nuwapa Promchotichai; Grace Yoon; Jonathan Scalera; Terence D Capellini; David T Felson; Vijaya B Kolachalama Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2021-10-29 Impact factor: 10.995