Literature DB >> 29582100

The impact of time to catheter removal on short-, intermediate- and long-term urinary continence after radical prostatectomy.

Derya Tilki1,2, Felix Preisser3,4, Pierre Karakiewicz4, Shahrokh F Shariat5, Markus Graefen3, Hartwig Huland3, Felix K Chun6, Raisa S Pompe3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the impact of prolonged catheterization time on 1-week (short-term), 3-month (intermediate-term) and 1-year (long-term) UC.
METHODS: Between 2008 and 2015, 6918 men underwent RP by four high-volume surgeons. Exclusion criteria were baseline urinary incontinence (UI) and radiotherapy prior or within 12 months after RP. For the remaining 4111 patients, data on short-, intermediate- and long-term UC were available for 3989, 2490 and 1967 patients, respectively. UC was defined as the use of zero or 1-safety pad/24 h. Time to catheter removal was categorized into  ≤ 7, 8-14 and  ≥ 15 days. To assess the impact of catheterization time on short-, intermediate- and long-term UI, uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for age, BMI, prostate volume, pathological tumor stage, Charlson comorbidity index and nerve-sparing technique were performed.
RESULTS: Post-RP UC rates at 1 week for catheterization of  ≤ 7, 8-14 and ≥ 15 days were 31.2, 27.4 and 18.0%. For the same groups, 3-month and 1-year UC rates were 82.7, 79.2 and 74.1% as well as 90.8, 91.6 and 88.2%, respectively. In multivariate logistic regressions, longer catheterization time was associated with worse short- and intermediate UI (OR 15 days: 2.19 and 1.54; p = ≤ 0.001 and p = 0.04). This difference dissipated at 1 year after RP (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: While longer catheterization is associated with worse short- and intermediate-term UC, it has no adverse impact on long-term UC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catheter removal; Catheterization; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Urinary continence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29582100     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2274-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  20 in total

Review 1.  Safety and outcome of early catheter removal after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rabi Tiguert; Jérôme Rigaud; Yves Fradet
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vincenzo Ficarra; Giacomo Novara; Raymond C Rosen; Walter Artibani; Peter R Carroll; Anthony Costello; Mani Menon; Francesco Montorsi; Vipul R Patel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg; Henk Van der Poel; Timothy G Wilson; Filiberto Zattoni; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Radiographic assessment of the vesicourethral anastomosis directing early decatheterization following nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  D P Dalton; A J Schaeffer; J E Garnett; J T Grayhack
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta").

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Early removal of urinary catheter after radical retropubic prostatectomy is both feasible and desirable.

Authors:  H Lepor; A M Nieder; M C Fraiman
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Early removal of the catheter after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  A Nadu; L Salomon; A Hoznek; L E Olsson; F Saint; A de La Taille; A Cicco; D Chopin; C C Abbou
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Early Catheter Removal after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Outcomes for the Aalst Technique (ECaRemA Study).

Authors:  Christian Gratzke; Zach Dovey; Giacomo Novara; Nicolas Geurts; Ruben De Groote; Peter Schatteman; Geert de Naeyer; Giorgio Gandaglia; Alexandre Mottrie
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Removal of urinary catheter on postoperative day 3 or 4 after radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rupa Patel; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Current technique of open intrafascial nerve-sparing retropubic prostatectomy.

Authors:  Lars Budäus; Hendrik Isbarn; Thorsten Schlomm; Hans Heinzer; Alexander Haese; Thomas Steuber; Georg Salomon; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Prognostic Factors for Anastomotic Urinary Leakage Following Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy and Correlation With Voiding Outcomes.

Authors:  Luigi Cormio; Giuseppe Di Fino; Carmen Scavone; Domenico Maroscia; Vito Mancini; Nicola Ruocco; Francesco Bellanti; Oscar Selvaggio; Francesca Sanguedolce; Giuseppe Lucarelli; Giuseppe Carrieri
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  2 in total

1.  Superior early and long-term continence following early micturition on day 2 after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a randomized prospective trial.

Authors:  Nina Natascha Harke; Christian Wagner; Nikolaos Liakos; Katarina Urbanova; Mustapha Addali; Boris A Hadaschik; Jorn H Witt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-02       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Sebastian Lenart; Ingrid Berger; Judith Böhler; Reinhard Böhm; Georg Gutjahr; Nikolaus Hartig; Daniel Koller; Michael Lamche; Stephan Madersbacher; Michael Stolzlechner; Claudia Elisa Wayand; Anton Ponholzer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 4.226

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.